similar to: Would this be considered a packaging bug?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Would this be considered a packaging bug?"

2017 Feb 25
2
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
On 02/25/2017 06:12 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 02/25/2017 06:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 >> >> The source RPM there uses >> >> %if 0%{?rhel} >> # not upstreamed >> Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch >> Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch
2017 Feb 25
0
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
On 02/25/2017 06:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 > > The source RPM there uses > > %if 0%{?rhel} > # not upstreamed > Patch500: 0001-disable-libe-book-support.patch > Patch501: 0001-fix-build-of-bundled-libzmf-with-boost-1.56.patch > Patch502: 0001-allow-to-build-bundled-libzmf-on-aarch64.patch > Patch503:
2017 Feb 25
0
Would this be considered a packaging bug?
On 02/25/2017 06:33 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 02/25/2017 06:12 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 02/25/2017 06:52 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=861692 >>> >>> The source RPM there uses >>> >>> %if 0%{?rhel} >>> # not upstreamed >>> Patch500:
2019 Jun 14
2
Text-Extraction Libraries for Omindex
This is a list with some libraries that I have been looking at. The idea is to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of adding some of these libraries to Xapian. If anyone knows another library that could be add to the list it would be great! Libfreexl: * For Excel (.xls) * Last release: 2018-02 * Info: gaia-gis.it/fossil/freexl/index * License: MPL tri-license
2015 Apr 22
3
libvirtd for el7
Hi, I see that for EL6 gwd already has pushed a libvirtd package with version 1.2.10[1]. I got request from VDSM development to provide libvirt >= 1.2.9 for EL7 for oVirt 3.6. gwd, do you just rebuilt http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=594825 ? I'm looking at http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=628689 may this work for you? [1]
2019 Dec 06
2
OCaml 4.09.0 rebuild complete in Rawhide (was: Re: OCaml 4.09.0 will be added to Fedora 32 via a side tag)
This is now complete and soon the new packages will be merged into Fedora Rawhide: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-2e0b2d6395 A few non-critical packages failed to build, and I will look at these later unless someone gets around to it before me. The failures are listed at the end. Notable changes: - Release notes: https://ocaml.org/releases/4.09.0.html - ocaml-camlp4
2017 Jun 12
3
xen4centos kernel version / debuginfo
Is there any problem moving to 4.9.31? This contains upstream commits f2e767bb5d6ee0d9 for mpt3sas and 69861e0a52f87333 for dom0 memory mappings. I am also trying to build a debuginfo package but it's not correct. Specifically I'm able to get vmlinux but the .debug files for modules are stripped, which isn't right. Does anyone know how to fix this? I'm also not sure how
2019 Oct 31
4
PHP FPM issue
Hi Marius, Will make the changes and see how it goes. On the other hand https://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=27138 if the above was released we could just install and migrate to rh-php73-php, which is not affected as per https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2019-11043 thanks --- Thomas Stephen Lee On Thu, Oct 31, 2019 at 8:40 PM Marius ROMAN <marius at roman.systems>
2016 Mar 03
2
status for centos-release-docker and docker packages
I have rpm sources for centos-release-docker at https://github.com/CentOS-virt7/centos-release-docker Some updated packages available on centos-docker-common-testing branch are: docker: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9932 atomic: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10046 docker-distribution: http://cbs.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=9950 I think I need to have the
2016 Jun 10
2
Fixed updates for EL5 / EL6
> Please go download -8 and test it. Sorry to be ignorant but how do I do that in EL6? Thanks!
2014 Sep 13
2
VGA resume & thaw (wake up from S3 & S4) broken - kernel(nouveau) exclusively
On 13.09.2014 07:02, poma wrote: > On 13.09.2014 06:57, poma wrote: >> >> Actually I have nothing to show cause logs are all OK. >> Haha, it seems to me that the bugs become intelligent. >> >> 3.15.10-201.fc20.x86_64 >> 3.16.2-200.fc20.x86_64 >> 3.17.0-0.rc4.git3.2.fc22.1.x86_64 >> nouveau [ DRM] suspending display... >> nouveau [
2018 Jan 23
2
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net> wrote: > Hi, > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on > this > list, > > and a patch was applied to virt-sig kernel aswell? > > > > Call trace looks similar.. > > Good memory! I'd forgotten about that despite being the one who ran into >
2020 Sep 03
2
ansible: which repo?
What would you recommend: ansible is in EPEL8 and ConfigSIG. For the latter I do not see any sources in git.centos.org. Where they come from? I wonder with which repository I should use (long term)? dnf not checking gpg signature sounds scary: https://github.com/ansible/ansible/blob/v2.9.13/changelogs/CHANGELOG-v2.9.rst#security-fixes -- Leon
2018 Jan 24
2
Xen 4.6.6-9 (with XPTI meltdown mitigation) packages making their way to centos-virt-xen-testing
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 06:20:39PM -0600, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 01/23/2018 05:57 PM, Karl Johnson wrote: > > > > > > On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:50 PM, Nathan March <nathan at gt.net > > <mailto:nathan at gt.net>> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > Hmm.. isn't this the ldisc bug that was discussed a few months ago on this
2011 Nov 06
2
CentOS 6: php-eaccelerator
has anybody ever got eaccelerator working with open_basedir on CentOS? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=751569 i wonder that the last build is more than a yaer ago and nobody hitted until now or nobody is secring his vhsost and so did not take notice about it http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=181336 -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was
2019 Apr 11
2
postgis-2.0.7-2.el7 still in epel7-testing?
Hi all, I'm looking for a fix in postgis, which seems to be fixed already in postgis-2.0.7-2.el7. However that package seems to be 'stuck' in the epel7-testing repository: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=750618 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2016-b6c229157e Is there a reason that the package is not pushed to stable yet? Or can it be
2019 Sep 26
2
Missing packages in centos8 mirrors or do I miss something?
Hi, I need to port OSCAR Cluster and SystemImager softwares to centos8, but I miss a lot of package that seems to be built for centos-8. For example, I cant find docbook-utils and docbook-utls-pdf while I see them here: https://koji.mbox.centos.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=651 I?ve installed epel-release and elrepo-release and centos-release-stream. Do I miss something or is it a matter of time
2013 Sep 06
4
Re: [virt-tools-list] Is virsh supposed to work on Windows?
On Thu, Sep 05, 2013 at 03:30:12PM -0300, Fernando Lozano wrote: > >>I've pushed test builds of mingw-virt-viewer packaging libvirt 1.1.2 if you want > >>to give them a try to see if they work better (disclaimer: I haven't tested > >>these installers at all). > >Pushed to http://teuf.fedorapeople.org/virt-viewer-msi/ ;) > > Thanks for providing those
2007 Sep 25
2
Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm has dependency errors on Centos5 server-how to fix?
Running Centos5 server software. Running ALL software except virtualization and server cluster. Patched this server software via yum updates as of 9.24.2007 Downloaded the webcam software for FC7 from: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=10106 Zoneminder-1.22.3-6.fc7.i386.rpm When YUM tried to install this version of Zondminder, finds this 1 missing dependency: Missing
2019 Sep 24
2
Re: [PATCH nbdkit 0/4] common/protocol: Unify public <nbd-protocol.h>
On 9/24/19 4:23 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > The cover letter was rather brief, let me try to explain this change > some more ... > > When we created libnbd, we needed the definitions of various NBD > protocol things (like protocol message layouts, constants etc). We > copied a header file from nbdkit which provided these. Over time this > header file has diverged from