similar to: Delaying services starting at boot

> Date: Sunday, February 05, 2017 10:26:05 -0500 > From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> > > I have read: > http://thegeekdiary.com/centos-rhel-7-chrony-vs-ntp-differences-bet > ween-ntpd-and-chronyd/ > > My server is up all the time and will serve time to internal > systems (via DHCP options). > > Caveat is that my server is an armv7

On 05/02/17 16:15, Richard wrote: > >> Date: Sunday, February 05, 2017 10:26:05 -0500 >> From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >> >> I have read: >> http://thegeekdiary.com/centos-rhel-7-chrony-vs-ntp-differences-bet >> ween-ntpd-and-chronyd/ >> >> My server is up all the time and will serve time to internal >> systems (via

I have read: http://thegeekdiary.com/centos-rhel-7-chrony-vs-ntp-differences-between-ntpd-and-chronyd/ My server is up all the time and will serve time to internal systems (via DHCP options). Caveat is that my server is an armv7 (Cubieboard2) which does not have an RTC (no battery). So whenever the system boots, the time is ZERO (Dec 31, 1969 or some such). Chrony fixes this really fast;

On 02/05/2017 11:58 AM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > On 05/02/17 16:15, Richard wrote: >>> Date: Sunday, February 05, 2017 10:26:05 -0500 >>> From: Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> >>> >>> I have read: >>> http://thegeekdiary.com/centos-rhel-7-chrony-vs-ntp-differences-bet >>> ween-ntpd-and-chronyd/ >>> >>> My

I have a problem in that at first all my log files were dated 12-31-1969 and logrotate has: # more /var/lib/logrotate.status logrotate state -- version 2 "/var/log/yum.log" 1969-12-31-20:26:1 "/var/named/data/named.run" 1969-12-31-20:26:1 "/var/log/httpd/error_log" 2015-8-27-4:43:1 "/var/log/wtmp" 1969-12-31-20:26:1 "/var/log/chrony/*.log"

On 04/20/2017 05:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: > On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >> So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. > I think it?s more the case that CentOS is written with the assumption that you?re running it on a host with a battery-backed RTC, so that system time

I just had to change the install command to use ftp. I had to uncomment all of the drive partitioning commands. At first I was confused as to the partitioning failure, then figured out that the partitioning commands were commented out. Most likely to prevent an unwanted disk clearing. Only things: Did stop at the bootup to create a user id. Not a big deal in this case, as I was logging

> Am 29.05.2017 um 05:46 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: > > > > On 05/28/2017 06:57 PM, Rob Kampen wrote: >> On 28/05/17 23:56, Leon Fauster wrote: >>>> Am 28.05.2017 um 12:16 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 05/28/2017 04:24 AM, Tony

On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:39 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > On 04/20/2017 05:16 PM, Warren Young wrote: >> On Apr 20, 2017, at 3:00 PM, Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: >>> So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. >> I think it?s more the case that CentOS is

I am running RH6.1 on an x86 with 2.0.6 installed with an RPM. I am confused as to getting smb to start at bootup. It works fine if I start it manually (/etc/rc.d/init.d/smb start). I swear, the 5.2 installation had smb start at bootup, but I can't find the difference between the two. Is the answer 1 - edit the /etc/inetd.conf file (swat needed a line uncommented) 2 - edit the

Now with firewalld, opening up ports is now 'better' done by opening services. So what do I need, for starters it seems: dns, dhcp, dhcpv6, samba, kerberos Here is the list of services: RH-Satellite-6 amanda-client bacula bacula-client dhcp dhcpv6 dhcpv6-client dns ftp high-availability http https imaps ipp ipp-client ipsec kerberos kpasswd ldap ldaps libvirt libvirt-tls mdns mountd

Progress... On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service > now, i'm not "pro" systemd or con systemd, i use it but i set my

On 27/08/15 13:50, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: > After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. > > I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) > > I wonder why almost every "centos/redhat/rpm based" howto removes firewalld with the base iptables service Now here's a funny thing, I was searching the samba wiki for 'firewall' and found there

AFAIK the only thing needed to make your host an NTP server using chrony is to set the allow line to the network address in CIDR format of the network you want to be served, and uncomment it. The restart chronyd. You also need to ensure that port 123 (NTP) is open to your internal network on your filrewall. I have a CentOS 6 box that is an NTP server for my network. CentOS 7 works the same

Oh, this really helps. See below, though. On 08/27/2015 09:33 AM, Rowland Penny wrote: > On 27/08/15 14:25, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> Progress... >> >> On 08/27/2015 08:50 AM, L.P.H. van Belle wrote: >>> After reading this thread.. and ..seeing the comments.. >>> >>> I googled a bit around. and yes.. more then 5 sec.. ;-) >>>

On 12/28/16, 3:28 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: On 12/28/2016 06:13 PM, Greg Cornell wrote: > On 12/28/16, 3:09 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: > > > > On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J

So I have learned that Postfix should delay until Chronyd has moved the system time from 0 to current. What other services need to be delayed? Apache? Bind? Of course if this is a nameserver, Chronyd will probably not be able to resolve the NTP server addresses until Bind is running! thanks

On 12/28/16, 3:09 PM, "CentOS on behalf of Robert Moskowitz" <centos-bounces at centos.org on behalf of rgm at htt-consult.com> wrote: On 12/28/2016 06:05 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: > > On 28/12/16 21:24, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Robert Moskowitz wrote: >>> >>> On 12/28/2016 03:32 PM, J Martin Rushton wrote: >>>> On 28/12/16 20:11,

On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 14:13:45 +0100 Roy Eastwood via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 12:16:42 +0100 > > Rowland Penny via samba<samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > On Sat, 21 Jul 2018 11:24:47 +0100 > > Roy Eastwood via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > > > > > "Failed to establish your Kerberos

mDNS is not DNS mDNS (zeroconf/avahi) ( used for .local and .lan reserved tlds ) is an apple thingy.. mDNS udp 5353 DNS tcp/udp 53. Yes, dns tcp + udp. If and dns udp package is to large it switches to tcp. got that from wiets ( the postfix developer ) So i must believe him.. wiets is great.. ( and dutch ) :-)) Greetz, Louis >-----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- >Van: samba