similar to: disable/mask NetworkManager leads to unit startup fails

Thank you very much James for your deep explaining answer! That cleared everything up for me and yes that helped a lot. Have a nice day :) -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht----- Von: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] Im Auftrag von James Hogarth Gesendet: Montag, 16. J?nner 2017 19:37 An: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Betreff: Re: [CentOS] disable/mask NetworkManager

On 16 January 2017 at 15:24, Oberdorfer Patrick <patrick.oberdorfer at a1telekom.at> wrote: > Hello! > > > > For me it was best practice to disable "NetworkManager" on headless > installations. > > Now suddenly I ran into an problem with several programs not starting > correctly upon boot anymore. > > The problem seems to be that their unit files

> On 11/17/18 8:31 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >>>> >>>> unbound running on localhost. >>>> >>>> Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using >>>> the

On 08/03/17 14:54, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > If you'd like a really simple solution that avoids NetworkManager, I > suggest using systemd-networkd (both systemd-networkd and > systemd-resolved packages required). I've used it to set up a bridge > on my workstattion for use with libvirtd/kvm, and it is just as simple > a text file but future compatible. Heck, it

> On 09/02/2020 23:55, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > > Hi Nicolas, > > [snip] > >> Maybe there's a reason to make NetworkManager more or less mandatory >> from now on, but I don't see it. So I thought I'd rather ask on this >> list. > > Like you, I read about NetworkManager becoming the default tool for > CentOS 8. So I sat down with a colleague

On 08/03/17 10:38, John Hodrien wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Giles Coochey wrote: > >> ifconfig enp0s25 192.168.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 >> route add default gw 192.168.0.254 enp0s25 >> echo nameserver 8.8.8.8 > /etc/resolv.conf >> echo nameserver 8.8.4.4 >> /etc/resolv.conf > > Oh okay, you really do want to back away from Redhat entirely. That's

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 8:12 AM Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 11, 2020 at 06:11:04AM +0100, Simon Matter via CentOS wrote: > > Unfortunately, instead of fixing/refactoring the whole bash networking > > script mess, another new project was started instead, called > > systemd-networkd :-) > > Actually, I'm sad that

On 11/17/2018 07:01 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 11/17/2018 06:43 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. >> >> unbound running on localhost. >> >> Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using >> the localhost for name resolution - whenever NetworkManager gets >> restarted (usually only a system boot) it

On Thu, 9 Mar 2017, isdtor wrote: > Did I see an implicit "do as Red Hat says or else" there somewhere? Not > appropriate. Linux is not Windows (yet). In the heat of the moment it may > easily be forgotton that Linux is all about choice. We choose to run CentOS, > and we choose to run it the way we see fit. We appreciate the efforts that > go into the *Community*

Hello all, I updated two of my servers to CentOS 7.2 (1511) two days ago, and since, on one of them, the network services are started (and fail to start) before the network interfaces are online. Parts of "journalctl" after the last reboot : d?c. 17 10:21:44 myserver kernel: NET: Registered protocol family 40 d?c. 17 10:21:45 myserver sshd[700]: error: Bind to port 22 on

Hello Guys, update my post, because of a route from ipv6 on same networkcard, with only ipv4 enabled Sincerely Andy

And to add to the issues concerning consistency, what if you have a fail over unit and you're replicating configuration (i.e. NIC), you really prefer that NIC names remain the same. Given the hardware morass underneath all of this, the only safe choice (regardless of whether you use systemd, init scripts, whatever) is to take control and force the association of the name to the MAC address in

Hi, I'm currently reading the upstream "Considerations in adopting RHEL 8" document. The chapter about networking states that traditional networking scripts (shipped with the network-scripts package) are considered obsolete. I bluntly admit I don't see the point in this. As far as I'm concerned, I've been a happy user of NetworkManager since the early days (when

On 21.04.2015 16:46, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 04/21/2015 08:54 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: >> On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: >>> Networking isn't really controlled by systemd but by NetworkManager. I >>> usually just yum remove NetworkManager* and then everything works just >>> as it did in CentOS 6. >>

William Kennington <william at wkennington.com> writes: > Agreed. > On Feb 1, 2015 4:21 AM, "Etienne Dechamps" <etienne at edechamps.fr> wrote: > >> Considering how cheap that operation seems to be, would it make sense >> to call res_init() every time tinc retries a metaconnection? It's not >> doing that very often anyway... and it would solve

On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 03:46:52PM +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: > Networking isn't really controlled by systemd but by NetworkManager. I > usually just yum remove NetworkManager* and then everything works just > as it did in CentOS 6. Note: NetworkManager is in CentOS6 too, and is part of the default workstation install. The NM in CentOS7 is a bit more polished than the NM

How to inst that Network manager please ================ Worthy agent of Light ================ Jules Irenge MSc Student University of Liverpool

On Wed, Mar 08, 2017 at 10:43:57AM +0000, Giles Coochey wrote: > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/KISS_principle > > I'm not flaming NetworkManager, I'm just stating that for many (perhaps > most), it is over-engineered for a server orientated distribution. I can run > with the script above on 30 server instances, and it doesn't, as yet, break > any of the other

I've been banging my head against the wall trying to get a simple two NIC bond to work. Got really odd behavior from service network restart, then finally decided to disable NetworkManager. Voila! Bonding and the network service script starts working just the way I expect. Does anyone here actually use NetworkManager on anything but a laptop or desktop? I can't seem to figure out a reason

CentOS 7.5 image running on linode. unbound running on localhost. Have to use a cron job once a minute to keep /etc/resolv.conf using the localhost for name resolution - whenever NetworkManager gets restarted (usually only a system boot) it gets over-written. It seems every distro has a different way of preventing NetworkManager from replacing that file. I found instructions for Fedora that