similar to: How to downgrade gtk2 libs in CentOS 6.8?

On 01/09/2017 07:54 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Jan 9, 2017, at 4:08 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org> wrote: >> Hi all. I'm using a CentOS 6.8 VM to do volunteer builds for an open >> source project. I want to build Pale Moon with a gtk2 library older >> than 2.24, to allow people with older linuxes to run it. Short summary, >> if built

On Jan 9, 2017, at 4:08 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org> wrote: > Hi all. I'm using a CentOS 6.8 VM to do volunteer builds for an open > source project. I want to build Pale Moon with a gtk2 library older > than 2.24, to allow people with older linuxes to run it. Short summary, > if built against version gtk2-2.24 and/or higher, the binary will use a >

On Mon, Jan 09, 2017 at 09:39:08AM -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/09/2017 07:54 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > > On Jan 9, 2017, at 4:08 AM, Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org> wrote: > >> Hi all. I'm using a CentOS 6.8 VM to do volunteer builds for an open > >> source project. I want to build Pale Moon with a gtk2 library older > >> than

Walter Dnes wrote: > Hi all. I'm using a CentOS 6.8 VM to do volunteer builds for an open > source project. I want to build Pale Moon with a gtk2 library older > than 2.24, to allow people with older linuxes to run it. Short summary, > if built against version gtk2-2.24 and/or higher, the binary will use a > function that does not exist in gtk2-2.23 and lower. Net result

Yes David, I'm using a release 32 of Firefox to reach my olds C6100 IDRAC7 interface. The problem is for latest Firefox versions as they require libgtk-3 not available in Centos6/RHEL6 distribution. Today I use a very very bad solution to reach my switch with latest firmware version from the latest Firefox available in CentOS: I disable https and use http.... Even if it is on a private

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 08:06:49AM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote > Wouldn't this be easier done as a mock chroot? I realize you're > not building RPMs, but you could use the chroot for building any > software, and on any arbitrary CentOS or Fedora system. 1) Not everybody runs Fedora/Redhat/CentOS 2) The builds I'm doing are targetted at distros, like Puppy linux,

I'm running a CentOS 6.5 chroot to build Pale Moon (a Firefox fork) for older machines running distros like Puppy linux. Before anyone asks... * Yes, even though the older machines are using "ancient" glibc, etc, they do have security patches back-ported, e.g. http://www.murga-linux.com/puppy/viewtopic.php?t=90461 "Lucid Puppy Revitalized as 5.2.8.7 - December,

I posted Friday about this oddity. Now I've got more data, and what's happening is this: if I tell noscript to enable youtube and googlevideo in one tab, not only does it affect *all* tabs, but also affects another browser window opened from the first browser window. Anyone have any clues for a workaround fix? mark

The program I'm using is 4NEC2, a freeware antenna-modelling program. I'm running wine-0.9.61 on Gentoo Linux on a Dell with Intel Core Duo cpu. Let's say I'm working on a design that I call "fubar". 4NEC2 will create files with names like "fubar.NEC" and "fubar.log". 4NEC uses Notepad to open the files for viewing. For some reason, my system

Hello, I would like to install CentOS 7.3 on my new Lenovo M900 machine. I am using the official 1 DVD installer. The installation process was fine without any error but after reboot the USB keyboard and the USB mouse did not work. Therefore I was not able to type anything or pass the first boot screen. Only the power button is working. Any idea why? I believe the installation media is using the

I have CentOS7 32-bit x86 AltArch in a VM. Following advice I found on Google, I tried stuff like "sudo yum install centos-release-scl" and "sudo yum install epel-release". They came back with... No package centos-release-scl available. No package epel-release available. What am I missing? -- Walter Dnes <waltdnes at waltdnes.org>

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 11:37:09AM +0100, Patrick B?gou wrote > Yes David, I'm using a release 32 of Firefox to reach my olds C6100 > IDRAC7 interface. > The problem is for latest Firefox versions as they require libgtk-3 not > available in Centos6/RHEL6 distribution. > > Today I use a very very bad solution to reach my switch with latest > firmware version from the

On Sun, Feb 12, 2017 at 10:43:39AM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote > The point I was making is to make the old CentOS 6.5 environment as > a chroot. That's exactly my intention. As I said in my original message... >> * or send out a 1.3 gigabyte centos65.tar.xz and give simple >> instructions to extract the archive, copy over /etc/resolv.conf, >> bind-mount

Is there a way to install devtoolset packages without the bloat of eclipse? I just want the new compiler and toolchain, not a big IDE. BTW devtoolset-3 dependencies are broken in yum with C6 yum install devtoolset-3 ... ---> Package devtoolset-3-perftools.x86_64 0:3.1-12.el6 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: devtoolset-3-dyninst for package:

What does this error mean? Updating : gtk2 35/178 g_module_open() failed for /usr/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/libpixbufloader-png.so: /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0: undefined symbol: inflateReset /usr/bin/gtk-query-immodules-2.0-64: /usr/local/lib/libpng12.so.0: no version information available (required by /usr/lib64/libcairo.so.2)

Is Adobe the only provider of flash plugins? Is it still a gaping security hole? Do the answers depend on the browser? -- Michael hennebry at web.cs.ndsu.NoDak.edu "Sorry but your password must contain an uppercase letter, a number, a haiku, a gang sign, a heiroglyph, and the blood of a virgin." -- someeecards

http://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=641 Summary: Allow disabling of GTK2 within the RPM build process. Product: Portable OpenSSH Version: -current Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: Miscellaneous AssignedTo: openssh-bugs at mindrot.org

Hi, I'm using CentOS 5.3 on all my desktops, and I really like it. Now I'd like to build a few additional apps that aren't included in any third party repo. Some of them require GTK2 2.12 to build, so I'm considering a (careful) upgrade of this package. General question: 1) how "safe" is it to upgrade this package? To do so, I'd use an SRPM from Fedora. 2) What

Has anyone tested installing the newer kernels from elrepo (or somewhere else) in order to keep google-chrome updated beyond version 27? Actually, i assumed a newer kernel would come with a newer glibc but i do not see a newer glibc via elrepo, just newer kernels. hmmm. # yum --disablerepo=* --enablerepo=elrepo* info glibc | grep -i repo only lists my already installed glibc packages from

While doing a browser fingerprinting survey, I was quite surprised to see I actually have a FireFox plugin installed. The culprit is /usr/lib64/mozilla/plugins/librhythmbox-itms-detection-plugin.so It appears that whoever maintains the rhythmbox RPM has chosen not to package the browser plugin separately like it probably should be. So if I have the rhythmbox RPM installed, I have the plugin.