similar to: Result: hostbyte=DID_ERROR driverbyte=DRIVER_OK

> On Jan 3, 2017, at 2:59 PM, lakhera2017 <plakhera at salesforce.com> wrote: > > |- 1:0:0:15 sdq 65:0 failed ready running > - 3:0:0:15 sdai 66:32 failed ready running Does the same SAN target fail each time? What brand/model/firmware SAN switch is between initiator and target? Does the HBA show any SCSI aborts?

I am building a new system using an Kingston 240GB SSD drive I pulled from my notebook (when I had to upgrade to a 500GB SSD drive). Centos install went fine and ran for a couple days then got errors on the console. Here is an example: [168176.995064] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14 FAILED Result: hostbyte=DID_BAD_TARGET driverbyte=DRIVER_OK [168177.004050] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14 CDB: Read(10)

Hello We were attempting to use scsi-target-utils, hosted on a xen dom0 vm using localhost, and running into some problems. I was not able to reproduce this on a centos 7.2 server using the default kernel. (From dmesg) Apr 4 11:18:42 funk kernel: [ 596.511204] connection2:0: detected conn error (1022) Apr 4 11:18:42 funk kernel: connection2:0: ping timeout of 5 secs expired, recv

To be honest, I'd not try a btrfs volume on a notebook SSD. I did that on a couple of systems and it corrupted pretty quickly. I'd stick with xfs/ext4 if you manage to get the drive working again. <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_campaign=sig-email&utm_content=webmail&utm_term=icon> Virus-free. www.avast.com

Hello! I''ve a ubuntu server running over a HVM DomU. After a hang, the domU doesn''t start again. The domU was not able to mount the virtual machine disk so I started with a live cd and I tried to mount the disk root part / with no success so I ran fsck.ext3 and it gave me input/output error in the domU and in dom0 the kernel says: Feb 14 18:22:28 scofield last message

On 08/09/2017 01:48 PM, hw wrote: > Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> I am building a new system using an Kingston 240GB SSD drive I pulled >> from my notebook (when I had to upgrade to a 500GB SSD drive). >> Centos install went fine and ran for a couple days then got errors on >> the console. Here is an example: >> >> [168176.995064] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#14

I had a busy mailserver fail on me the other day. Below is what was printed in dmesg. We first suspected a hardware failure (raid controller or something else), so we moved the drives to another (identical hardware) machine and ran fsck. Fsck complained ("short read while reading inode") and asked if I wanted to ignore and rewrite (which I did). After booting up again, the problem came

By natively, I take it using kernel /vmlinuz (vs kernel /xen) Not yet, but working on setting up such an environment. (At this time, I was using virt-install to reproduce the problem, and the original server we are testing on did not support kvm but the 2nd server does). On 2016-04-12 03:26 AM, George Dunlap wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2016 at 9:14 PM, Nathan Coulson <nathan at

Hi everyone, I have one OCFS2 issue. The OS is Ubuntu, using linux kernel is 3.2.50. There are three node in the OCFS2 cluster, and all the node is using the iSCSI SAN of HP 4330 as the storage. As the storage restarted, there were two node restarted for fence without heartbeating writting on to the storage. But the last one does not restart, and it still write error message into syslog as below:

what file system are you using?? ssd drives have different characteristics that need to be accomadated (including a relatively slow write process which is obvious as soon as the buffer is full), and never, never put a swap partition on it, the high activity will wear it out rather quickly.? might also check cables, often a problem particularly if they are older sata cables being run at a possibly

Hi, Doing some extensive benchmarks on BTRFS, I encountered a kernel bug in BTRFS (as reported in dmesg) Maybe the information below can help you making btrfs better. Situation Doing an intensive sequential write on a SAS 3TB disk drive (SEAGATE ST33000652SS) with 128 threads with Sysbench. Device is connected through an HBA. Blocksize was 256k ; Kernel is 3.3.0 (x86_64) ; Btrfs is version

I''ve been trying to install a 2.6.37-12 kernel from kernel-ppa on one of my Ubuntu machines without success. It keeps giving errors like this: [ 9.115544] ata9: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0xf SErr 0x0 action 0x10 frozen [ 9.115550] ata9.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED [ 9.115556] ata9.00: cmd 60/04:00: d4:82:85/00:00:1f:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 2048 in [ 9.115557]

We have a CentOS 6.2 server with KVM. That server hosts 2 virtual machines, both with Centos 6.2, too. Regularly, one or both of the virtual machines pass to state "pause" without apparent reason. On resume, I do get have messages, like the following in /var/log/messages. Feb 28 21:50:45 achernar fcoemon: Failed to connect to lldpad Feb 29 08:23:56 achernar kernel: sd 0:0:0:0: [sda]

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11578 Bug ID: 11578 Summary: Rsync does start with an error directly connecting an USB drive to a port Product: rsync Version: 3.1.1 Hardware: x64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: P5 Component: core

Hi all, We've having an issue at the moment where an iSCSI connection was temporarily lost on a few VMs running CentOS 6 on ESXi. The problem is, now that the iSCSI connection has returned, we are not able to remount the drive. At first the drive is read-only, so I tried '*mount -o remount,rw*' which didn't work (still read-only), so then I tried a '*umount*' (which

Ok, got a quickie. I have an eSATA drive, a 750GB Seagate in an eSATA external enclosure, and a Silicon Image sil3132 ExpressCard controller for my laptop. The disk and controller work great in CentOS 5 (or F7, for that matter), if I specifically mount it. This is not how I want to have to use this drive, however. I want to hotplug it; that is, plug the controller into the laptop, and then

Hi, I''m running OpenSuse 12.2 with kernel 3.5.3 HBA= LSI 1068e using the MPTSAS driver (patched) (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/1379181/) SANOS1:/media # uname -a Linux SANOS1 3.5.3 #3 SMP Sun Sep 2 18:44:37 CEST 2012 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux I''ve tried to simulate a disk replacement but it seems that now /dev/sdg is stuck in the btrfs pool (RAID10) SANOS1:/media #

Observed on Linux 3.2.9 after the controller/disk flaked in-out. (The world still needs a SCSI error decoding tool to tell normal people what cmd and res are about.) [ 157.732885] device label srv devid 4 transid 11292 /dev/sdf [ 157.733201] btrfs: disk space caching is enabled [ 172.936515] device label srv devid 4 transid 11292 /dev/sdf [44106.091461] ata4.01: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x0

Hello, I have experienced a dom0 crash where the system became unreachable via the network and the console was unresponsive. I would appreciate help interpretting the logs and any configuration change suggestions. It is a stock Debian Lenny dom0 running xen 3.2.1 with kernel 2.6.26-2-xen-amd64 and an AMD Athlon IIx4 with 4 GB of RAM. It is running 4 VMs. One VM has two PCI NICs being

I have a 3 disk raid1 filesystem mounted with nodatacow. I have a folder in said filesystem with the ''C'' NOCOW & ''Z'' Not_Compressed flags set for good measure. I then copy in a large file and proceed to make random modifications. Filefrag shows no additional extents created, good so far. A big thank you to the those devs who got that working. However, after