similar to: CentOS 7.2.1511 upgrade to 7.3, many failed dependencies

On 09/19/17 11:58, Richard wrote: > > >> Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:53:24 -0400 >> From: Pete Geenhuizen <pete at geenhuizen.net> >> >> On 09/19/17 11:44, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>> Pete Geenhuizen wrote: >>>> I upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4 over the weekend.? Everything went >>>> well except that I can't login

> Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 12:32:00 -0400 > From: Pete Geenhuizen <pete at geenhuizen.net> > > On 09/19/17 11:58, Richard wrote: >> >> >>> Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:53:24 -0400 >>> From: Pete Geenhuizen <pete at geenhuizen.net> >>> >>> On 09/19/17 11:44, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >>>> Pete

> Date: Tuesday, September 19, 2017 11:53:24 -0400 > From: Pete Geenhuizen <pete at geenhuizen.net> > > On 09/19/17 11:44, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> Pete Geenhuizen wrote: >>> I upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4 over the weekend.? Everything went >>> well except that I can't login because the screen is black with a >>> cursor. >>>

On 09/19/17 11:44, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Pete Geenhuizen wrote: >> I upgraded from 7.3 to 7.4 over the weekend.? Everything went well >> except that I can't login because the screen is black with a cursor. >> >> If reboot boot the 7.3 kernel 3.10.0-514.26.2.el7.x86_64 kernel >> everything works just fine, so my guess is that there's a kernel issue

As a heads up RHEL 7.3 is released: https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-US/Red_Hat_Enterprise_Linux/7/html/7.3_Release_Notes/index.html Pay careful attention when the CR repo starts churning out RPMs (if you have CR enabled) as there have been a few rebases in this - notably firewalld, NetworkManager, freeIPA, libreoffice, samba, amongst others If you have an ipv6 environment ping is now

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 11:43:21 -0400 > From: m.roth at 5-cent.us > > We started updating via CR over a week ago, before 6.7 was > official, and just today identified an issue.... For (alleged) > security, the agency I work as a contractor for runs SiteMinder, > from CA. > ># insert rant_against_CA.h > >

We started updating via CR over a week ago, before 6.7 was official, and just today identified an issue.... For (alleged) security, the agency I work as a contractor for runs SiteMinder, from CA. #insert rant_against_CA.h Anyway, starting late last week, we found issues - as in, its process, which runs under, and is started by, apache, was suddenly pegging a CPU or so. Trying to stop httpd, that

On 11/04/2016 04:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > As a heads up RHEL 7.3 is released: <snip> 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO! And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611) based on RHEL-7.3 Sources. The main tree will be labeled '7.3.1611' on the mirrors (along side 7.0.1406 and 7.1.1503, and 7.2.1511, all of which are already there) 2. When will it be done? a.

On Fri, Nov 4, 2016 at 8:59 AM, Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org> wrote: > On 11/04/2016 04:38 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > As a heads up RHEL 7.3 is released: > > <snip> > > 1. Is CentOS-7.3 done yet? Answer: NO! > > And it is NOT CentOS-7.3 .. it is CentOS-7 (1611) based on RHEL-7.3 > Sources. The main tree will be labeled '7.3.1611' on

Hey, folks, I just saw Johnny mention 5.9 yesterday, and this morning, my manager tells me he got about 100 emails from somewhere about 5.9 and a CR repo. So, my questions to the team is: is there a CR repo, and is there some urgency to enabling it, or shall we just wait for the release? The *only* thing I can think of having real issues with is the newest PIV cards.... mark

Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: > W dniu 24.11.2015 o 19:38, m.roth at 5-cent.us pisze: >> Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I >> didn't get much response. > > It's normal for bareos mailing list and bugtrac system. Bareos is paid > support oriented (even opesourced), so don't expect so much help from > them - when they could get

On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 09:34, Simon Matter <simon.matter at invoca.ch> wrote: > > On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 08:40, Simon Matter via CentOS <centos at centos.org> > > wrote: > > > >> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > >> >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a > >> >>

On 09/06/2017 08:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/05/2017 02:26 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>> On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>>> On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Apr 2020 at 08:40, Simon Matter via CentOS <centos at centos.org> > wrote: > >> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2020 at 11:06:45AM +0200, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> >> Which leads me to the more general question of: enable CR on a >> >> production >> >> server, yes or no? >> > >> > Not on production. Only for testing.

On 08-09-2017 6:17, Kevin Stange wrote: > On 09/06/2017 05:21 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 09/06/2017 08:40 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 09/05/2017 02:26 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>> On 09/04/2017 05:27 PM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 09/04/2017 03:59 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >>>>>> On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote:

Hi, I got an alert from Yum-Cron this morning: Failed to check for updates with the following error message: Failed to build transaction: sclo-php72-php-pecl-imagick-3.4.4-1.el7.x86_64 requires libMagickCore.so.5()(64bit) sclo-php72-php-pecl-imagick-3.4.4-1.el7.x86_64 requires libMagickWand.so.5()(64bit) The CR repository is activated on this server, so I guess that's why. Which leads me

Richard wrote: >> From: m.roth at 5-cent.us <snip> >> Anyway, starting late last week, we found issues - as in, its >> process, which runs under, and is started by, apache, was suddenly >> pegging a CPU or so. Trying to stop httpd, that worked... but this >> idiot process never did (and it's ugly to clean up after). >> >> What we just this

On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: > A recently created and fully functional CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot > after applying CR updates: <snip> > Server OS is CentOS 7.3 using Xen (no CR updates): > rpm -qa xen\* > xen-hypervisor-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 > xen-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 > xen-licenses-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 > xen-libs-4.6.3-15.el7.x86_64 >

> Date: Tuesday, August 11, 2015 12:59:58 -0400 > From: m.roth at 5-cent.us > > Richard wrote: >>> From: m.roth at 5-cent.us > <snip> >>> Anyway, starting late last week, we found issues - as in, its >>> process, which runs under, and is started by, apache, was >>> suddenly pegging a CPU or so. Trying to stop httpd, that >>>

On 09/02/2017 08:11 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 09/01/2017 02:41 PM, Kevin Stange wrote: >> On 08/31/2017 07:50 AM, PJ Welsh wrote: >>> A recently created and fully functional CentOS 7.3 VM fails to boot >>> after applying CR updates: >> <snip> >>> Server OS is CentOS 7.3 using Xen (no CR updates): >>> rpm -qa xen\* >>>