similar to: pacmd command to switch outputs for an application?

----- Original Message ----- | | [root at server2 home]# mount server1:/home/jason /home/jason | [root at server2 home]# | [root at server2 home]# ls /home/jason/ | Desktop Documents Downloads Music mylogfile.txt Pictures Public | Templates Videos | [root at server2 home]# df -h /home/jason/ | Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on | server1:/home/jason 297M 19M 278M 7%

im trying to set up a shared samba directory for users to use on centos 7, but whenever I create a file from the samba client to the samba server, the owner of the file ends up being the user the share is mounted up as.. on the server (server1), [samba] comment = samba share path = /samba/ read only = No valid users = @samba write list = @samba force group = +samba

hey folks, we upgraded bind last night to bind-9.8.2-0.62.rc1.el6_9.1.x86_64 and now our server seems to not be able to update. Whenever we add records and update the soa and reload, it still shows the old data.. so for example, we have [root at bind1 /var/named]$grep servername domainname.net.zone [root at bind1 /var/named]$nslookup -port=5353 servername 10.115.76.87 Server: 10.10.76.87

Hi, Updating selinux-policy-targeted to 3.7.19-260 fails. The archive seems corrupt. Got another copy from http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/os/x86_64/Packages/ which also fails: # rpm -Fv selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-260.el6.noarch.rpm Preparing packages for installation... selinux-policy-targeted-3.7.19-260.el6 warning: /etc/selinux/targeted/contexts/customizable_types saved as

Hi, I tried to apply a security context on a directory with the following commands: [root@ local]# semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t "netdot(/.*)?" [root@ local]# restorecon -R netdot/ When I list the contexts, it is part of the list.... [root@ local]# semanage fcontext -l | grep netdot ./netdot(/.*)? all files

Hello John, On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 16:33 +0000, John Hodrien wrote: > On Thu, 9 Feb 2017, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > > How about my request for checksums in the git repo? > > What checksums would you actually want in git? SRPMS are signed which allows the integrity of the contents to be checked. Such an integrity check is missing from the git repo. Either a checksum

hey folks, running CentOS release 6.6 (Final) and I was upgrading some rpms and now since screen (and probably some others) were upgraded, I can no longer reattach to my screen session I had running. monsterjam:~ $ rpm -qi screen Name : screen Relocations: (not relocatable) Version : 4.0.3 Vendor: CentOS Release : 18.el6

I'm using Centos-7 on my PC, with ASUS motherboard. internal audio has always worked fine EXCEPT that I can never get audio input (for recording) to work. I want to feed audio from a phono turntable and from a cassette deck. I use a phono preamp for the turntable, or directly connect the tape deck. but either nothing, or low level with horrible distortion. so, I gave up (after years of

On 10/19/2016 11:34 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > Hello Gordon, > *snip* > > Personally I would be more concerned whether or not to enable ECDSA > algorithms (https://blog.cr.yp.to/20140323-ecdsa.html). > > Regards, > Leonard. > For web server ECDSA certs is currently a concern because the only curves with popular support across browsers have parameters that were

On Sun, Sep 25, 2016 at 04:38:39PM +0200, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > The qemu-kvm option "-enable-nesting" that I dug up in the source looks > promising. No mention in the man page on either C6 or C7 but it is > mentioned here: > https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2012-October/msg01138.html > > How do I pass the "-enable-nesting" option to

Hello team, Just wondering how the build of 5.10 is coming along. Is there a resource that informs us on these matters? Thanks! Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Hello listmates, I have encountered a rather peculiar situation. We have a Centos 6 VM (64 bit) running on a VMware vSphere 5.5 server. It was running just fine until one day I decided to reboot it and it just would not boot up. Effectively, dracut failed to initialize the LVM, much like under the scenario described here:

Hi, I woke up Saturday morning unable to boot my freshly upgraded 5.6 with grub hanging at "GRUB". After getting the boot loader fixed I experienced crashes in evolution. Downgrading glibc to 2.5-58 seems to fix these issues. Anyone else seeing this? Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

Hi, Anyone else seeing this? C7 Gnome Desktop, opened a gnome-terminal, click File -> New Profile and gnome-terminal-server gets killed. Regards, Leonard. -- mount -t life -o ro /dev/dna /genetic/research

On 10/19/2016 01:54 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> On 10/19/2016 11:34 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: >>> Hello Gordon, >>> >> *snip* >>> >>> Personally I would be more concerned whether or not to enable ECDSA >>> algorithms (https://blog.cr.yp.to/20140323-ecdsa.html). >>> >> For web server ECDSA

Hello Warren, On Thu, 2017-02-09 at 14:22 -0700, Warren Young wrote: > There are two serious problems with this argument: > > 1. Give me a scenario where this attacker can execute *only* pkcheck > in order to exploit this hypothetical library?s flaw, but where the > attacker cannot simply provide their own binary to do the same > exploit. Short of something insane like

you are correct sir.. something is screwed up! I remember running into a problem with the base repo enabled and swept it under the rug by disabling it for the moment and then forgot all about disabling it.. So when I enable the base repo, and run yum with debug flag, I see the following: Setting up Package Sacks http://mirror.centos.org/centos/%24releasever/os/x86_64/repodata/repomd.xml:

On Thu, 2017-02-02 at 06:40 -0800, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/2/2017 6:22 AM, Leonard den Ottolander wrote: > > However, the fact that the binary in the example is setuid is orthogonal > > to the fact that heap spraying is a very serious attack vector. > > without privilege escalation, what does it attack ? pkcheck might not be directly vulnerable. However, pkexec is.

Hello Johnny, On Wed, 2016-12-14 at 06:58 -0600, Johnny Hughes wrote: > So: > > git clone https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!skopeo Apart from the syntax error because the exclamation mark is not escaped this leads nowhere. So I tried: $ git clone https://git.centos.org/git/rpms/skopeo.git > (that just happens to be what I am working on right now) > > cd skopeo > >

Hello, The latest update to sudo (sudo-1.7.2p1-14.el5_8.2) breaks postgresql. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=846631 It might break other services that rely on access to /etc/nsswitch.conf too. Assuming you have a "sudoers" line in /etc/nsswitch.conf that file will be recreated with incorrect file permissions. After having had issues with selinux permissions on that