similar to: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0]

Never saw this email....Did anyone get it?? anyone know how to fix this?thanks again. From: KM <info4km at yahoo.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Monday, August 7, 2017 11:26 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 36s! [swapper/0:0] All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the email trail, the file

All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM From: correomm <correomm at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Thursday, August 18,

This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware ESXi 5.1. The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh (timeout error). The details of last issues was reported to retrace.fedoraproject.org. ?Do you have a hint? [root at vmguest ~]# abrt-cli list id

> 2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > >> This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware >> ESXi 5.1. >> The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only >> on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh >> (timeout error). >> > I'm

2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware > ESXi 5.1. > The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only > on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh > (timeout error). > I'm also seeing those errors in several

Adam Tauno Williams wrote: > On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: >> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the >> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be >> added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. >> Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM > > Yes, I see this

On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: > All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the > email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be > added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. > Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM Yes, I see this behavior as well. Never have found a solution - other

On 24 April 2018 at 17:16, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Adam Tauno Williams wrote: >> On Mon, 2017-08-07 at 15:26 +0000, KM wrote: >>> All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs. but as stated in the >>> email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist. Should it be >>> added? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. >>>

Hello Carlos, You can try the 'at' command to achieve the same result. Regards, -Mart?n On May 14, 2015 12:13 AM, "Carlos A. Carnero Delgado" < carloscarnero at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I'm in need of rebooting a server 1 minute after I give the command. I'm > used to > > shutdown -r +1 > > > which works as advertised. Now that

On 14/05/15 13:44, Martin Cigorraga wrote: > Hello Carlos, > You can try the 'at' command to achieve the same result. > Regards, > -Mart?n or 'sleep' > On May 14, 2015 12:13 AM, "Carlos A. Carnero Delgado" < > carloscarnero at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I'm in need of rebooting a server 1 minute after I give the

I just updated my quad-processor X64 machine (AMD Phenom(tm) II X4 945 Processor) to the latest CentOS 5 xen kernel (2.6.18-371.4.1.el5xen) and I am getting occasional "BUG: soft lockup - CPU#n stuck for X s! [swapper:0]" messages. I did some net searching, and found some bugzilla reports (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=649519 and http://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=4488),

Hi BTRFS community I have a problem using btrfs/nfs to store my vmware images. - following setup :(debian wheezy + backports) Linux sncubetest02 3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.14.12-1~bpo70+1 (2014-07-13) x86_64 GNU/Linux > btrfs --version Btrfs v3.14.1 > btrfs fi show Label: none uuid: 8e37c8d0-e0ef-4857-ae9f-9a1be21901ed Total devices 2 FS bytes used 210.27GiB

Hi, shutting down a Centos6 kvm guest does not work from outside doing a 'virsh shutdown vmguest', I've installed the CentOS-6.2-x86_64-minimal.iso inside the kvm guest I reckon this is related to acpi ... # dmesg | grep ACPI ACPI Error: A valid RSDP was not found (20090903/tbxfroot-219) ACPI: Interpreter disabled. pnp: PnP ACPI: disabled acpiphp: ACPI Hot Plug PCI Controller Driver

Hi, when creating a bigger (> 50 GB) HVM guest with maxmem > memory we get softlockups from time to time. kernel: [ 802.084335] BUG: soft lockup - CPU#1 stuck for 22s! [xend:31351] I tracked this down to the call of xc_domain_set_pod_target() and further p2m_pod_set_mem_target(). Unfortunately I can this check only with xen-4.2.2 as I don''t have a machine with enough memory for

I am trying to get TPM 2.0 pass through to work with Xen and libvirt, but I can't get it to work. According to the following sites both Xen and libirt have TPM 2.0 support. https://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Virtual_Trusted_Platform_Module_(vTPM) https://libvirt.org/formatdomain.html#elementsTpm However, when I add a TPM device to a VM (by virt-manager), the VM guest XML does contain the TPM

Hi there, Is there a way to prevent Windows HVM guests from seeing passed through devices like graphics cards as being ejectable? i.e. you pass through a graphics adapter to an HVM guest which happens to be Windows. Windows sees this as a device with hotplug capability. Therefore it shows up in "safely remove hardware" option in the windows system tray. VMWare provides an option to

Hello, Over the last several weeks I've had a couple of CentOS 7 guests running in ESXi freeze because the CentOS halted the CPU. The problem is described here: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2000542 My CentOS 6 VMs are not misbehaving at all, nor are the Ubuntu VMs. Anyone else seeing this bug or know what to do

On Mon, November 24, 2014 15:49, Jack Bailey wrote: > Hello, > > Over the last several weeks I've had a couple of CentOS 7 guests running > in ESXi freeze because the CentOS halted the CPU. The problem is > described here: > > http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=2000542 > > My CentOS 6 VMs are not

Hi all, while fiddling with VmWare View without being able to join windows7 client to samba4 domain, we stumbled on the following article: http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1028164 which says, should we run MS Windows 2008R2 AD, we should enable the "Allow cryptography algorithms compatible with Windows NT 4.0"

Hello, I know, often asked, often discussed .. No recommendation from Citrix. What is the better solution? 1) use ntp in the XEN host and synchronize the guests with the clock running on the control domain (independent_wallclock=0, what the default is) 2) or use ntp in host and guest (and independent_wallclock=1) I ask, because the XEN host (bare metal) has a more stable clock and if the ntp