similar to: [OT] firefox 45.5.1

On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 12:32:29AM -0600, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > read 'announce' of new release for firefox-45.5.0, then for firefox-45.5.0, > decided, wrongly, to upgrade. my bad. nothing but problems. > > on opening what moz devs considered as 'latest and greatest', found that it > was more crapola from moz devs. For what its worth, 45.5.1 is the version of

On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:46:43PM -0600, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > > 2- where might i find earlier releases of 40.x? > > > > 3- if i install 40.x in path /var/lib/yum/plugins/local/, > > will i be able to roll back. > > any offers for questions 2 & 3? Short answer: Don't. Long answer: You're trying to install arbitrary versions of firefox

On 12/04/2016 12:32 AM, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: > read 'announce' of new release for firefox-45.5.0, then for firefox-45.5.0, > decided, wrongly, to upgrade. my bad. nothing but problems. <> > 3 questions; > > 1- anyone else having problems with 45.5.1? > > 2- where might i find earlier releases of 40.x? > > 3- if i install 40.x in path

On 12/08/2016 08:04 AM, Jonathan Billings wrote: > On Wed, Dec 07, 2016 at 12:46:43PM -0600, geo.inbox.ignored wrote: >>> 2- where might i find earlier releases of 40.x? >>> >>> 3- if i install 40.x in path /var/lib/yum/plugins/local/, >>> will i be able to roll back. >> >> any offers for questions 2 & 3? > > Short answer:

Here's what I got: a running shoutcast server, and doing just fine thanks. machine is a crapola with a 486 dx/4 24meg, running SuSE kernel 2.2.16, no X, no soundcard, runs secondary DNS and serves NFS. nothing else, hell, doesn't even have a monitor attached. http, sendmail and others run on another box that has more *oomph*, in case you're wondering. icecast 1.4.0 compiled on the

On Fri, June 12, 2015 8:28 am, g wrote: > > > On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote: >> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP, >> from MySQL. > > i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the > bugs introduced by moz dev and their 'bells and whistles' when > they started try to get ahead of gaagle

> Nope, llvm's .s output is only compatible with GAS and other at&t syntax > assemblers.  It turns out that MASM syntax is highly ambiguous and MASM is > not production quality for use by a compiler.  This is why visual studio > doesn't go through it.  Long term, we'd like LLVM to be able to write out .o > files directly, if you're interested in adding PECOFF

On 06/07/2015 11:05 PM, g wrote: > > > On 06/07/2015 07:25 PM, Kay Schenk wrote: > <<>> > >> So, I'm not sure how to interpret what you said. Can I get the same >> results from a CentOS install using some combination of options? > > because your are playing with multi flavors, > [i bet you like going to baskin-robbins for ice cream ;-) ]

On 06/12/2015 07:28 AM, g wrote: > > On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote: >> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP, >> from MySQL. > i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the > bugs introduced by moz dev and their 'bells and whistles' when > they started try to get ahead of gaagle chrome web browser.

On 08/27/15 13:07, John R Pierce wrote: > On 8/27/2015 10:56 AM, g wrote: >> we had a vary serious and meaningful intercourse that only someone of >> a high amount of education and intelligence would have been able to >> maintain. > > PLEASE tell me this whole post is tongue-in-cheek. > . that is one place for a tongue. ;-) look at the meaning of the word.

Hi all I''ve started using some of the scriptaculous effects here, and have noticed something weird. Whenever I use one of the effects, it causes many of the fonts on the same page to rendered with a lighter weight (ie: "less bold"). Has anyone else noticed a similar effect in Firefox? I use 1.5b1 on Mac. This seems to be a common bug in moz-based browsers, as Camino does

On 06/12/2015 11:25 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > jd1008 wrote: >> On 06/12/2015 07:28 AM, g wrote: >>> On 06/10/2015 03:56 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>>> I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP, >>>> from MySQL. >>> i am still using 24.8.0 and do not have to contend with all the >>> bugs introduced by moz

<font face="Default Sans Serif,Verdana,Arial,Helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"> <div>Thanks Aki,</div><div><br></div><div>do you know if this list is read by dovecot developers team too? Could you point me to the right list otherwise?</div> <div><br><br>Raffaele

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"> <html> <head> <meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type"> </head> <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000"> Thanks to all those who responded to our email.<br> <br> Tilmann Scheller wrote: <blockquote

I displayed, as a web page, a list of search results created in PHP, from MySQL. Firefox prevents me looking at the web page's source coding. Right-click, view source, produces this display:- "Document Expired "This document is no longer available. "The requested document is not available in Firefox's cache. " As a security precaution, Firefox does not

My icecast server (1.3.11) has been getting 404 errors for the past couple of days from the yp.shoutcast.com server. If I send the URL manually by telneting to the webserver at yp.shoutcast.com I get the following response: [chrisp@ayeka httpd]$ telnet yp.shoutcast.com 80 Trying 205.188.234.56... Connected to scastlb1.shoutcast.com. Escape character is '^]'. GET