similar to: glusterfs bits..

hi everyone I've started googling but have to failed to find if - glusterfs does not translate local FS (xfs) quotas and presents them to its clients, does it? It is only glusterfs own quota functions that we have to manage quoatas or ... it is me and my Samba missing something? And if I already have my xfs quotas and which xfs is local FS to gluster then my Samba should be presenting

Dear list, I noticed that GlusterFS 11 introduces a new "simple quota" system. According to the pull request? the implementation is based on Amar's earlier proposal? and is inspired by work they did in Kadalu. Other than that I don't see any documentation or discussion about these features. Specifically, it seems that the implementation relies on the quota features of the

Hi Sambalist, maybe someone with some glusterfs experience can help me. I have a running samba4 installation here. Now i tried to get glusterfs configured so I can use glusterfs as an additional storagesystem. The setup of glusterfs worked pretty easy. I tried multiple configurations with up to 4 virtual machines (Virtual Box). The bricks are xfs-filesystems. Mounting glusterfs (mount -t

Hi, I'm currently running GlusterFS over XFS, and it works quite well. I'm wondering if it's possible to add data deduplication into the mix by: glusterfs --> lessfs --> xfs or glusterfs --> opendedupe --> xfs Has anybody tried doing this? We're running VM images on gluster, and I figure we could get a bit of space saving bu deduplicating the data. Gerald

Hi Everyone, I was running GlusterFS 3.3.1 on ext4 with CentOS 6.3, but it ran out of memory quickly because of known bug in 64/32 bits operations with ext4. I built another machine with XFS and added it to volume, after full heal, switched to the new machine. The configuration is the following: 1st machine with CentOS 6.3 with XFS, 2nd machine with CentOS 6.3 with ext4. They are in replica

There are options that can help a little bit with the ls/find. Still, many devs will need to know your settings, so the volume's info is very important. Try the 'noatime,nodiratime' (if ZFS supports them). Also, as this is a new cluster you can try to setup XFS and verify if the issue is the same. RedHat provide an XFS options' calculator but it requires aby kind of subscription

Hi, Can u please explain for what purpose pacemaker cluster used here? Regards, Jiffin On Thursday 07 December 2017 06:59 PM, Tomalak Geret'kal wrote: > > Hi guys > > I'm wondering if anyone here is using the GlusterFS OCF resource > agents with Pacemaker on CentOS 7? > > yum install centos-release-gluster > yum install glusterfs-server

Hi, following problem: I am not able to change the security permissions with my windows client (Windows Server 2008 R2). I receive "An error occurred while applying security information to HOST.SAMDOM.EXAMPLE.COM access is denied". The error occurs with samba and glusterfs as shipped with Ubuntu 14.04. A (test-) script to reproduce the error can be found on :

On Tue, 29 Aug 2023 15:44:35 +0200 Marco Gaiarin via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > Mandi! Rowland Penny via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > > >> In samba the share is: > > I wish people wouldn't do this, if you are going to post a share, > > please post the global section as well. > > Sorry. > > # Global parameters >

Hi Jose, There is a known issue with gluster 3.12.x builds (see [1]) so you may be running into this. The "shared-brick-count" values seem fine on stor1. Please send us "grep -n "share" /var/lib/glusterd/vols/volumedisk1/*" results for the other nodes so we can check if they are the cause. Regards, Nithya [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517260

Hi guys I'm wondering if anyone here is using the GlusterFS OCF resource agents with Pacemaker on CentOS 7? yum install centos-release-gluster yum install glusterfs-server glusterfs-resource-agents The reason I ask is that there seem to be a few problems with them on 3.10, but these problems are so severe that I'm struggling to believe I'm not just doing something wrong. I created

Hi, Some days ago all my glusterfs configuration was working fine. Today I realized that the total size reported by df command was changed and is smaller than the aggregated capacity of all the bricks in the volume. I checked that all the volumes status are fine, all the glusterd daemons are running, there is no error in logs, however df shows a bad total size. My configuration for one volume:

[ Received no feedback, i resend it... ] A little strange things, but i'm hitting my head on the wall... I needed to 'enlarge' my main filesystem (XFS backed-up), that contain my main samba share and a brick for a GFS share; i've setup a new volume (for the VM), formatted XFS, move all the file taking care to umount and stop GFS (so, syncing the brick, not the GFS filesystem)

A little strange things, but i'm hitting my head on the wall... I needed to 'enlarge' my main filesystem (XFS backed-up), that contain my main samba share and a brick for a GFS share; i've setup a new volume (for the VM), formatted XFS, move all the file taking care to umount and stop GFS (so, syncing the brick, not the GFS filesystem) using --acls and -attrs rsync options. All

Hi Chris, here is a link to the settings needed for VM storage: https://github.com/gluster/glusterfs/blob/03592930239c3b43cbbdce17607c099ae075fd6d/extras/group-virt.example#L4 You can also ask in ovirt-users for real-world settings.Test well before changing production!!! IMPORTANT: ONCE SHARDING IS ENABLED, IT CANNOT BE DISABLED !!! Best Regards,Strahil Nikolov? On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 13:55,

Chris: Whilst I don't know what is the issue nor the root cause of your issue with using GlusterFS with Proxmox, but I am going to guess that you might already know that Proxmox "natively" supports Ceph, which the Wikipedia article for it says that it is a distributed object storage system. Maybe that might work better with Proxmox? Hope this helps. Sorry that I wasn't able

Greetings everyone, On behalf of the Gluster team I'm happy to announce that we've released GlusterFS v2.0. A milestone in terms of feature and stability has been reached, hope it helps your storage needs. :) Announcement =========== About GlusterFS: GlusterFS is a clustered file system that runs on commodity off-the-shelf hardware, delivering multiple times the scalability and

We use qcow2 with libvirt based kvm on many small clusters and have found it to be exremely reliable though maybe not the fastest, though some of that is most of our storage is SATA SSDs in a software RAID1 config for each brick. What problems are you running into? You just mention 'problems' -wk On 6/1/23 8:42 AM, Christian Schoepplein wrote: > Hi, > > we'd like to use

On 02/19/2018 10:24 AM, TomK wrote: > On 2/19/2018 2:39 AM, TomK wrote: > + gluster users as well.? Just read another post on the mailing lists > about a similar ask from Nov which didn't really have a clear answer. That's funny because I've answered questions like this several times. Gluster+Ganesha+Pacemaker-based HA is available up to GlusterFS 3.10.x. If you need HA,

Dear GlusterFS Engineer, I have questions that my glusterfs server and fuse client perform properly on below specification. It can write only *65MB*/s through FUSE client to 1 glusterfs server (1 brick and no replica for 1 volume ) - NW bandwidth are enough for now. I've check it with iftop - However it can write *120MB*/s when I mount nfs on the same volume. Could anyone check if the