similar to: tool for a comprehensive list of the storage structure

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "tool for a comprehensive list of the storage structure"

2016 Nov 02
0
tool for a comprehensive list of the storage structure
Try *lsblk -f* *[root at david ~]# lsblk -f NAME FSTYPE LABEL UUID MOUNTPOINT sda ??sda1 LVM2_member DWnNT0-aHQK-4zxn-cWIL-4iAQ-fboe-QaeyOK ??vg_Backups-Backups ext4 Backups 97baf04c-5dbb-43bd-9e56-b1c23e623ae4 /media/Backups sdb ??sdb1 ext4 boot 7186c3bc-ef06-4d34-9caf-3813ec004fbb
2018 Dec 05
2
// RESEND // 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test
(Resend: message didn't show, was my original message too big? Posted one of the output files to a website to see) The point of RAID1 is to allow for continued uptime in a failure scenario. When I assemble servers with RAID1, I set up two HDDs to mirror each other, and test by booting from each drive individually to verify that it works. For the OS partitions, I use simple partitions and
2018 Dec 06
0
// RESEND // 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test
On 12/5/18 11:55 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote: > The point of RAID1 is to allow for continued uptime in a failure scenario. > When I assemble servers with RAID1, I set up two HDDs to mirror each other, > and test by booting from each drive individually to verify that it works. For > the OS partitions, I use simple partitions and ext4 so it's as simple as > possible. I used my test
2009 Nov 18
1
To loop or not to loop with btrfs
Hi, This left me puzzled for a while: 22:29 borg:/ # losetup /dev/loop1 /.B.disk 22:29 borg:/ # mount /dev/loop1 /B mount: /dev/loop1: can''t read superblock 22:29 borg:/ # blkid /dev/loop1 /dev/loop1: UUID="e19fe89b-cde3-4ccc-bc70-b759a57bd1c9" UUID_SUB="f29c6218-d040-4546-a227-4dd2d2142817" TYPE="btrfs" 22:29 borg:/ # losetup -d /dev/loop1 22:29 borg:/ #
2013 Jan 03
33
Option LABEL
Hallo, linux-btrfs, please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some configurations it doesn''t work as expected. My usual way: mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ... One call for some devices. Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label, and therefore some other programs
2011 Dec 03
1
[PATCH] NEW API: add blkid command to print the attributes of the device
A NEW API blkid. It can print the device attributes. Use it after list-devices, we can list ower devices and the attributes of each device. Use it like: blkid <device> It's should be a usefull function, and needed no test case for it. Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com> --- daemon/blkid.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2011 Jun 25
8
how do determine last file system on disk?
Hi all, Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was formatted with, if fdisk -l doesn't show it? usb-storage: device found at 5 usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning Vendor: Model: Rev: Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic
2018 Dec 04
5
Accidentally nuked my system - any suggestions ?
Hi, My workstation is running CentOS 7 on two disks (sda and sdb) in a software RAID 1 setup. It looks like I accidentally nuked it. I wanted to write an installation ISO file to a USB disk, and instead of typing dd if=install.iso of=/dev/sdc I typed /dev/sdb. As soon as I hit <Enter>, the screen froze. I tried a hard reset, but of course, the boot process would stop short very early in
2010 Oct 24
4
Determine if a given fs is a btrfs fs
Hi, I''ve some btrfs fs which are encrypted with loopaes. I decrypt them in a script during bootup. Now I want to determine if the decrypted fs is a btrfs fs. If not I missspelled the password and I can handle that error in my script. Thanks for any help! Felix -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in the body of a message to
2010 Sep 29
0
[parted-devel] "Error: Can't have a partition outside the disk!"
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:28:33PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:55:59PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:11:48AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 05:42:21PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > In any case I'll probably write a small utility which just zaps the > > > >
2018 Dec 04
0
Accidentally nuked my system - any suggestions ?
Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > > My workstation is running CentOS 7 on two disks (sda and sdb) in a > software RAID 1 setup. > > It looks like I accidentally nuked it. I wanted to write an installation > ISO file to a USB disk, and instead of typing dd if=install.iso > of=/dev/sdc I typed /dev/sdb. As soon as I hit <Enter>, the screen froze. > > I tried a hard reset, but
2019 Apr 26
2
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm: prefix header search paths with $(srctree)/
Hi Dave, > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airlied at gmail.com] > Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 11:19 AM > To: Yamada, Masahiro/山田 真弘 <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>; Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>; > dri-devel <dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>; nouveau > <nouveau at
2019 Oct 01
2
[PATCH v2 0/9] drm/print: add and use drm_debug_enabled()
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch> wrote: > On Tuesday, 2019-09-24 15:58:56 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to >> abstract it better. There shouldn't be any functional changes. >> >> I'd appreciate acks for merging the lot via drm-misc. If there are any >> objections
2019 Oct 29
2
[PATCH v2 12/15] drm/amdgpu: Call find_vma under mmap_sem
On 2019-10-28 4:10 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com> > > find_vma() must be called under the mmap_sem, reorganize this code to > do the vma check after entering the lock. > > Further, fix the unlocked use of struct task_struct's mm, instead use > the mm from hmm_mirror which has an active mm_grab. Also the mm_grab > must be
2019 Sep 24
4
[PATCH v2 0/9] drm/print: add and use drm_debug_enabled()
Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to abstract it better. There shouldn't be any functional changes. I'd appreciate acks for merging the lot via drm-misc. If there are any objections to that, we'll need to postpone the last patch until everything has been merged and converted in drm-next. BR, Jani. Cc: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at intel.com>
2018 Nov 29
2
[PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Pass connector to AVI inforframe functions
On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: > Hi Ville, > > Thank you for the patch. > > On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 18:13:42 EET Ville Syrjala wrote: >> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> >> >> Make life easier for drivers by simply passing the connector >> to drm_hdmi_avi_infoframe_from_display_mode() and >>
2018 Dec 04
2
[PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Pass connector to AVI inforframe functions
On 03.12.2018 22:38, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote: >> On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote: >>> Hi Ville, >>> >>> Thank you for the patch. >>> >>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 18:13:42 EET Ville Syrjala wrote: >>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at
2018 Dec 10
2
[PATCH 4/7] drm: Move the legacy kms disable_all helper to crtc helpers
It's not a core function, and the matching atomic functions are also not in the core. Plus the suspend/resume helper is also already there. Needs a tiny bit of open-coding, but less midlayer beats that I think. Cc: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff at linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
2019 Apr 26
1
[PATCH v2] drm: prefix header search paths with $(srctree)/
Hi. On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:37 PM Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote: > > Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy > way [1]. > > To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to > the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in > that way, but not all. The goal of this
2018 Mar 22
8
[PATCH 00/23] drm: Eliminate plane->fb/crtc usage for atomic drivers
From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com> I really just wanted to fix i915 to re-enable its planes afer load detection (a two line patch). This is what I actually ended up with after I ran into a framebuffer refcount leak with said two line patch. I've tested this on a few i915 boxes and so far it's looking good. Everything else is just compile tested. Entire series