Displaying 20 results from an estimated 100 matches similar to: "tool for a comprehensive list of the storage structure"
2016 Nov 02
0
tool for a comprehensive list of the storage structure
Try *lsblk -f*
*[root at david ~]# lsblk -f
NAME FSTYPE LABEL
UUID MOUNTPOINT
sda
??sda1 LVM2_member DWnNT0-aHQK-4zxn-cWIL-4iAQ-fboe-QaeyOK
??vg_Backups-Backups ext4 Backups
97baf04c-5dbb-43bd-9e56-b1c23e623ae4 /media/Backups
sdb
??sdb1 ext4 boot
7186c3bc-ef06-4d34-9caf-3813ec004fbb
2018 Dec 05
2
// RESEND // 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test
(Resend: message didn't show, was my original message too big? Posted one of
the output files to a website to see)
The point of RAID1 is to allow for continued uptime in a failure scenario.
When I assemble servers with RAID1, I set up two HDDs to mirror each other,
and test by booting from each drive individually to verify that it works. For
the OS partitions, I use simple partitions and
2018 Dec 06
0
// RESEND // 7.6: Software RAID1 fails the only meaningful test
On 12/5/18 11:55 AM, Benjamin Smith wrote:
> The point of RAID1 is to allow for continued uptime in a failure scenario.
> When I assemble servers with RAID1, I set up two HDDs to mirror each other,
> and test by booting from each drive individually to verify that it works. For
> the OS partitions, I use simple partitions and ext4 so it's as simple as
> possible.
I used my test
2009 Nov 18
1
To loop or not to loop with btrfs
Hi,
This left me puzzled for a while:
22:29 borg:/ # losetup /dev/loop1 /.B.disk
22:29 borg:/ # mount /dev/loop1 /B
mount: /dev/loop1: can''t read superblock
22:29 borg:/ # blkid /dev/loop1
/dev/loop1: UUID="e19fe89b-cde3-4ccc-bc70-b759a57bd1c9"
UUID_SUB="f29c6218-d040-4546-a227-4dd2d2142817" TYPE="btrfs"
22:29 borg:/ # losetup -d /dev/loop1
22:29 borg:/ #
2013 Jan 03
33
Option LABEL
Hallo, linux-btrfs,
please delete the option "-L" (for labelling) in "mkfs.btrfs", in some
configurations it doesn''t work as expected.
My usual way:
mkfs.btrfs -d raid0 -m raid1 /dev/sdb /dev/sdc /dev/sdd ...
One call for some devices.
Wenn I add the option "-L mylabel" then each device gets the same label,
and therefore some other programs
2011 Dec 03
1
[PATCH] NEW API: add blkid command to print the attributes of the device
A NEW API blkid.
It can print the device attributes.
Use it after list-devices, we can list ower devices and the attributes
of each device.
Use it like:
blkid <device>
It's should be a usefull function, and needed no test case for it.
Signed-off-by: Wanlong Gao <gaowanlong at cn.fujitsu.com>
---
daemon/blkid.c | 75 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2011 Jun 25
8
how do determine last file system on disk?
Hi all,
Does anyone know how to determine which file system a disk was formatted
with, if fdisk -l doesn't show it?
usb-storage: device found at 5
usb-storage: waiting for device to settle before scanning
Vendor: Model: Rev:
Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02
sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi disk sda
sd 7:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic
2018 Dec 04
5
Accidentally nuked my system - any suggestions ?
Hi,
My workstation is running CentOS 7 on two disks (sda and sdb) in a
software RAID 1 setup.
It looks like I accidentally nuked it. I wanted to write an installation
ISO file to a USB disk, and instead of typing dd if=install.iso
of=/dev/sdc I typed /dev/sdb. As soon as I hit <Enter>, the screen froze.
I tried a hard reset, but of course, the boot process would stop short
very early in
2010 Oct 24
4
Determine if a given fs is a btrfs fs
Hi,
I''ve some btrfs fs which are encrypted with loopaes.
I decrypt them in a script during bootup. Now I want to determine if the decrypted fs
is a btrfs fs. If not I missspelled the password and I can handle that error in my
script.
Thanks for any help!
Felix
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-btrfs" in
the body of a message to
2010 Sep 29
0
[parted-devel] "Error: Can't have a partition outside the disk!"
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 05:28:33PM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 02:55:59PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:11:48AM +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 05:42:21PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > > > In any case I'll probably write a small utility which just zaps the
> > > >
2018 Dec 04
0
Accidentally nuked my system - any suggestions ?
Nicolas Kovacs wrote:
>
> My workstation is running CentOS 7 on two disks (sda and sdb) in a
> software RAID 1 setup.
>
> It looks like I accidentally nuked it. I wanted to write an installation
> ISO file to a USB disk, and instead of typing dd if=install.iso
> of=/dev/sdc I typed /dev/sdb. As soon as I hit <Enter>, the screen froze.
>
> I tried a hard reset, but
2019 Apr 26
2
[Intel-gfx] [PATCH v2] drm: prefix header search paths with $(srctree)/
Hi Dave,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airlied at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, April 26, 2019 11:19 AM
> To: Yamada, Masahiro/山田 真弘 <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied at linux.ie>; Daniel Vetter <daniel at ffwll.ch>;
> dri-devel <dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org>; nouveau
> <nouveau at
2019 Oct 01
2
[PATCH v2 0/9] drm/print: add and use drm_debug_enabled()
On Thu, 26 Sep 2019, Eric Engestrom <eric at engestrom.ch> wrote:
> On Tuesday, 2019-09-24 15:58:56 +0300, Jani Nikula wrote:
>> Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to
>> abstract it better. There shouldn't be any functional changes.
>>
>> I'd appreciate acks for merging the lot via drm-misc. If there are any
>> objections
2019 Oct 29
2
[PATCH v2 12/15] drm/amdgpu: Call find_vma under mmap_sem
On 2019-10-28 4:10 p.m., Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg at mellanox.com>
>
> find_vma() must be called under the mmap_sem, reorganize this code to
> do the vma check after entering the lock.
>
> Further, fix the unlocked use of struct task_struct's mm, instead use
> the mm from hmm_mirror which has an active mm_grab. Also the mm_grab
> must be
2019 Sep 24
4
[PATCH v2 0/9] drm/print: add and use drm_debug_enabled()
Hi all, v2 of [1], a little refactoring around drm_debug access to
abstract it better. There shouldn't be any functional changes.
I'd appreciate acks for merging the lot via drm-misc. If there are any
objections to that, we'll need to postpone the last patch until
everything has been merged and converted in drm-next.
BR,
Jani.
Cc: Eric Engestrom <eric.engestrom at intel.com>
2018 Nov 29
2
[PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Pass connector to AVI inforframe functions
On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Ville,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 18:13:42 EET Ville Syrjala wrote:
>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
>>
>> Make life easier for drivers by simply passing the connector
>> to drm_hdmi_avi_infoframe_from_display_mode() and
>>
2018 Dec 04
2
[PATCH 1/4] drm/edid: Pass connector to AVI inforframe functions
On 03.12.2018 22:38, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2018 at 10:08:07AM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> On 21.11.2018 19:19, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Hi Ville,
>>>
>>> Thank you for the patch.
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2018 18:13:42 EET Ville Syrjala wrote:
>>>> From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala at
2018 Dec 10
2
[PATCH 4/7] drm: Move the legacy kms disable_all helper to crtc helpers
It's not a core function, and the matching atomic functions are also
not in the core. Plus the suspend/resume helper is also already there.
Needs a tiny bit of open-coding, but less midlayer beats that I think.
Cc: Sam Bobroff <sbobroff at linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter at intel.com>
Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst at linux.intel.com>
2019 Apr 26
1
[PATCH v2] drm: prefix header search paths with $(srctree)/
Hi.
On Fri, Mar 29, 2019 at 8:37 PM Masahiro Yamada
<yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, the Kbuild core manipulates header search paths in a crazy
> way [1].
>
> To fix this mess, I want all Makefiles to add explicit $(srctree)/ to
> the search paths in the srctree. Some Makefiles are already written in
> that way, but not all. The goal of this
2018 Mar 22
8
[PATCH 00/23] drm: Eliminate plane->fb/crtc usage for atomic drivers
From: Ville Syrj?l? <ville.syrjala at linux.intel.com>
I really just wanted to fix i915 to re-enable its planes afer load
detection (a two line patch). This is what I actually ended up with
after I ran into a framebuffer refcount leak with said two line patch.
I've tested this on a few i915 boxes and so far it's looking
good. Everything else is just compile tested.
Entire series