similar to: Latest glusterfs 3.8.5 server not compatible with livbirt libgfapi access

Dear All, we are running a dist. repl. volume on 4 nodes including geo-replication to another location. the geo-replication was running fine for months. since 18th jan. the geo-replication is faulty. the geo-rep log on the master shows following error in a loop while the logs on the slave just show 'I'nformations... somehow suspicious are the frequent 'shutting down connection'

Fwiw, rsync error 3 is: "Errors selecting input/output files, dirs" On January 19, 2018 7:36:18 AM PST, Dietmar Putz <dietmar.putz at 3qsdn.com> wrote: >Dear All, > >we are running a dist. repl. volume on 4 nodes including >geo-replication >to another location. >the geo-replication was running fine for months. >since 18th jan. the geo-replication is faulty.

Anyone ele having these issues mounting RDMA only volumes under Ubuntu? Install of Gluster via: https://launchpad.net/~semiosis/+archive/ubuntu-glusterfs-3.4 I'm guessing this build is looking for an include somewhere that is just misplaced? glusterfs 3.4.0beta4 built on Jun 28 2013 16:16:07 Repository revision: git://git.gluster.com/glusterfs.git Copyright (c) 2006-2011 Gluster Inc.

Hi list. I am dealing with DRBD (+GFS as its DLM). GFS configuration needs a CLVMD configuration. So, after syncronized my (two) /dev/drbd0 block devices, I start the clvmd service and try to create a clustered logical volume. I get this: On "alice": [root at alice ~]# pvcreate /dev/drbd0 Physical volume "/dev/drbd0" successfully created [root at alice ~]# vgcreate

Hi Krutika, May I kindly ping to you and ask that If you have any idea yet or figured out whats the issue may? I am awaiting your reply with four eyes :) Apologies for the ping :) -Gencer. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of gencer at gencgiyen.com Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:06 AM To: 'Krutika

Hi, Sorry for the late response. No, so eager-lock experiment was more to see if the implementation had any new bugs. It doesn't look like it does. I think having it on would be the right thing to do. It will reduce the number of fops having to go over the network. Coming to the performance drop, I compared the volume profile output for stripe and 32MB shard again. The only thing that is

Hi Krutika, I also did one more test. I re-created another volume (single volume. Old one destroyed-deleted) then do 2 dd tests. One for 1GB other for 2GB. Both are 32MB shard and eager-lock off. Samples: sr:~# gluster volume profile testvol start Starting volume profile on testvol has been successful sr:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=/testvol/dtestfil0xb bs=1G count=1 1+0 records in 1+0

Hello, I've found GlusterFS to be an interesting project. Not so much experience of it (although from similar usecases with DRBD+NFS setups) so I setup some testcase to try out failover and recovery. For this I have a setup with two glusterfs servers (each is a VM) and one client (also a VM). I'm using GlusterFS 3.4 btw. The servers manages a gluster volume created as: gluster volume

Hi, Sorry i did't confirm the results sooner. Yes, it's working fine without issues for me. If anyone else can confirm so we can be sure it's 100% resolved. -- Respectfully Mahdi A. Mahdi ________________________________ From: Krutika Dhananjay <kdhananj at redhat.com> Sent: Tuesday, June 6, 2017 9:17:40 AM To: Mahdi Adnan Cc: gluster-user; Gandalf Corvotempesta; Lindsay

Any additional tests would be great as a similiar bug was detected and fixed some months ago and after that, this bug arose?. Is still unclear to me why two very similiar bug was discovered in two different times for the same operation How this is possible? If you fixed the first bug, why the second one wasn't triggered on your test environment? Il 6 giu 2017 10:35 AM, "Mahdi

The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0 -Krutika On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > Great news. > Is this planned to be published in next release? > > Il 29 mag 2017 3:27 PM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha > scritto: > >> Thanks for that update.

Great, thanks! Il 5 giu 2017 6:49 AM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha scritto: > The fixes are already available in 3.10.2, 3.8.12 and 3.11.0 > > -Krutika > > On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 5:30 PM, Gandalf Corvotempesta < > gandalf.corvotempesta at gmail.com> wrote: > >> Great news. >> Is this planned to be published in next

1) hist() does not take NA's. Incompatible with Splus, probably just a bug? 2) I do wish we could somehow get rid of the misfeatures of indexing with logical NA's: > table(juul$menarche,juul$tanner) I II III IV V No 221 43 32 14 2 Yes 1 1 5 26 202 > juul$menarche=="Yes"&juul$tanner=="I",] ...and you find yourself with a listing of 477

On 12/06/19 1:38 PM, Alan Orth wrote: > Dear Ravi, > > Thanks for the confirmation?I replaced a brick in a volume last night > and by the morning I see that Gluster has replicated data there, > though I don't have any indication of its progress. The `gluster v > heal volume info` and `gluster v heal volume info split-brain` are all > looking good so I guess that's

Great news. Is this planned to be published in next release? Il 29 mag 2017 3:27 PM, "Krutika Dhananjay" <kdhananj at redhat.com> ha scritto: > Thanks for that update. Very happy to hear it ran fine without any issues. > :) > > Yeah so you can ignore those 'No such file or directory' errors. They > represent a transient state where DHT in the client process

Hi Mahdi, Did you get a chance to verify this fix again? If this fix works for you, is it OK if we move this bug to CLOSED state and revert the rebalance-cli warning patch? -Krutika On Mon, May 29, 2017 at 6:51 PM, Mahdi Adnan <mahdi.adnan at outlook.com> wrote: > Hello, > > > Yes, i forgot to upgrade the client as well. > > I did the upgrade and created a new volume,

Hi List! I want to use rsync to create differential backups of my lvm-snapshots. fullbackup-filename: /mnt/sdc1/snapshotvergleich/rootbackup1.img current snapshot: /dev/vg0/rootbackup note: compiled-in --copy-devices-patch root@xp8main3:/usr/local/src/rsync# ./rsync --version rsync version 3.1.0dev protocol version 31.PR5 Copyright (C) 1996-2009 by Andrew Tridgell, Wayne Davison, and

Krutika, I?m sorry I forgot to add logs. I attached them now. Thanks, Gencer. From: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] On Behalf Of gencer at gencgiyen.com Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 10:27 AM To: 'Krutika Dhananjay' <kdhananj at redhat.com> Cc: 'gluster-user' <gluster-users at gluster.org> Subject: Re:

Hi Krutika, Thank you so much for myour reply. Let me answer all: 1. I have no idea why it did not get distributed over all bricks. 2. Hm.. This is really weird. And others; No. I use only one volume. When I tested sharded and striped volumes, I manually stopped volume, deleted volume, purged data (data inside of bricks/disks) and re-create by using this command: sudo gluster

Just noticed that the way you have configured your brick order during volume-create makes both replicas of every set reside on the same machine. That apart, do you see any difference if you change shard-block-size to 512MB? Could you try that? If it doesn't help, could you share the volume-profile output for both the tests (separate)? Here's what you do: 1. Start profile before starting