similar to: CVE-2016-5195

Hi Team, I have a centos 7 running server with openssl version openssl-1.0.1e-51.el7_2.4.x86_64, I have received a set of vulnerability from security team, can anyone tell me as per below CVE do I need to update my openssl version to 1.0.1t? Or the current version which we have is safe. CVE-2016-0701, CVE-2015-3197 CVE-2015-4000 CVE-2015-0204 CVE-2015-0286, CVE-2015-0287, CVE-2015-0289,

Gracias Jorge! Pregunta: y por que fue archivado? ...................................................................................... Silvia Cobialca Cincinnati DBA Team - CIO RAS Team Accenture - Buenos Aires IO Delivery Center Desk: 5411 5196 2715, Mobile: 54911 4160 7748 Email: silvia.cobialca@accenture.com<mailto:silvia.cobialca@accenture.com> IM:

On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 2:18 PM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > My manager just told me that upstream has released a patched kernel for 7: > > CentOS package kernel-3.10.0-327.36.3.el7.x86_64.rpm > see http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-2098.html > > I'm hoping Johnny can get us that, hopefully before the end of the week. > > mark > >

Muchas gracias Carlos. Lo voy a probar a ver como me funciona con lo que tengo que procesar ...................................................................................... Silvia Cobialca Cincinnati DBA Team - CIO RAS Team Accenture - Buenos Aires IO Delivery Center Desk: 5411 5196 2715, Mobile: 54911 4160 7748 Email: silvia.cobialca en accenture.com IM: cobialca en hotmail.com Pager:

Queria saber si ya esta disponible un paquete para poder hacer sentiment analysis de textos en español en R. Si lo hay me podrían informar si lo puedo adicionar a la instalación en ingles? Gracias!!!! ...................................................................................... Silvia Cobialca Cincinnati DBA Team - CIO RAS Team Accenture - Buenos Aires IO Delivery Center Desk: 5411 5196

Daniel- Yo intente bajar de zoo/archive la version anterior (la 7.10) pero no es un zip y como mi OS es windows, no hay caso, no me lo toma. Al instalar sentiment140 (si, desde ese link que has puesto) desde el zip no me aparece en la lista de los paquetes instalados y por tanto cuando hago library(sentiment) me aparece un mensaje indicando que el paquete no existe Gracias por la ayuda!

Hi, I am trying to install node_openstack module for puppet. But I see its dependency on puppetlabs-cloud_provisioner<https://forge.puppetlabs.com/puppetlabs-cloud_provisioner> (>= 1.0.2) Is this version available, if not is there any work around? regards, Haynes Davis ________________________________ This message is for the designated recipient only and may contain privileged,

Hola! Necesitaria saber como/donde consigo zoo para version anterior a 3.0.3 ya que el que se instala por defecto es ese y no lo puedo cargar lugo ya que mi version de R es anterior a la 3.0.3 Por otro lado estoy tratando de instalar sentiment140 desde el zip como indica en la pagina y no lo puedo lograr, no me funciona ni pasa nada, en el log no aparece ningún mensaje. Cualquier ayuda me será

On Tue, 25 Oct 2016 10:06:12 +0200 Christian Anthon <anthon at rth.dk> wrote: > What is the best approach on centos 6 to mitigate the problem is > officially patched? As far as I can tell Centos 6 is vulnerable to > attacks using ptrace. I can confirm that c6 is vulnerable, we're running a patched kernel (local build) using a rhel6 adaptation of the upstream fix. Ask

Dear Sir/s, Can a crashed centos system be restore to its previous state before it crash? And if so, can you please tell me how to do it? Thanks, your help is very much appreciated. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Richard" <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 5:05:59 PM

Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote: > RedHat and Centos 4.x can be explored by this flaw? See: https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-5195 James Pearson

On Tue, November 1, 2016 6:25 pm, Tony Mountifield wrote: > In article <5818CD31.4050008 at moving-picture.com>, > James Pearson <james-p at moving-picture.com> wrote: >> Leonardo Oliveira Ortiz wrote: >> > RedHat and Centos 4.x can be explored by this flaw? >> >> See: >> >> https://access.redhat.com/security/cve/cve-2016-5195 > > In

On Fri, October 28, 2016 9:43 am, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 10/22/2016 07:49 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >> >> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >> >> At least those of us who still have important multi

Hello, I think we should build and release a new 3.18 kernel for the VirtSIG / Xen users.. It seems upstream 3.18.y tree has a release with the Dirty Cow security fix included, 3.18.44: https://kernel.googlesource.com/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/sashal/linux-stable/+log/linux-3.18.y-queue (also includes a Xen SMAP/PVOPS fix). Thanks, -- Pasi

Dear All, I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ At least those of us who still have important multi user machines running Linux. (Yes, me too, I do have a couple, thank goodness, the rest are already not ;-) Have a productive weekend, everybody. Valeri

On Sat, 22 Oct 2016, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Sat, October 22, 2016 7:49 pm, Valeri Galtsev wrote: >> Dear All, >> >> I guess, we all have to urgently apply workaround, following, say, this: >> >> https://gryzli.info/2016/10/21/protect-cve-2016-5195-dirtycow-centos-7rhel7cpanelcloudlinux/ >> >> At least those of us who still have important multi user

RedHat and Centos 4.x can be explored by this flaw? -----Mensagem original----- De: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] Em nome de Valeri Galtsev Enviada em: sexta-feira, 28 de outubro de 2016 12:50 Para: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Assunto: Re: [CentOS] CVE-2016-5195 ???DirtyCOW???: Critical Linux Kernel Flaw On Fri, October 28, 2016 9:43

Hi Gurus, I have a simple failover cluster on two SLES 12 SP3 nodes with Samba/winbind for authenticating AD-user access to the shares. The shares are reached through a virtual hostname/IP which differs from the SLES-server itself. The servers uses SSSD for normal SSH-authentication, also against the same Active Domain. Here is the problem - if I get Samba/winbind to work with the virtual

On 02/11/16 13:05, Richard wrote: > RHEL/Centos-4 is EOL so wouldn't be updated regardless (at least > under the normal EOL guidelines), but it is mentioned toward the > bottom of that page under "Affected Packages State": > > Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 kernel Not affected It is mentioned because RHEL4 is in extended life phase, so not EOL yet. CentOS 4 is EOL

Pasi, Recommend to test it out before production environment. Xlord -----Original Message----- From: centos-virt-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-virt-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Pasi K?rkk?inen Sent: Monday, October 24, 2016 2:55 AM To: centos-virt at centos.org Subject: [CentOS-virt] Linux 3.18.44 kernel with Dirty Cow fix (CVE-2016-5195) Hello, I think we should build and