Displaying 20 results from an estimated 5000 matches similar to: "Hint for nslookup wanted ..."
2016 Oct 11
1
Hint for nslookup wanted ...
On Tue, October 11, 2016 15:23, Richard Mann wrote:
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
>> Behalf Of Walter H.
>> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:05 AM
>> To: centos at centos.org
>> Subject: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> has anybody a
2016 Oct 11
2
Hint for nslookup wanted ...
On 11/10/16 15:23, Richard Mann wrote:
> Did your google break?
>
> For just IPv6
> nslookup -type=AAAA www.example.com
>
> For all records
> nslookup -type=any www.example.com
This is bad advice, because in DNS, ANY != ALL
If you query with qtype=any, and you ask a caching resolver, then it
will return to you all the records that are in its cache at that time,
which
2014 Aug 27
4
(no subject)
I have just jined this list. I can't seem to boot from a USB and my BIOS
recognizes my sandisk USB by name. I can't figure out what modules to use.
mbr.bin and parted is one method. Then syslinux is run and a syslinux.cfg is
needed. Is this sufficent for syslinux?
LINUX bzImage //kernel image
INITRD initrd // initial ramdisk to boot a small liinux system on a USB.
Bill
Thanks for any
2016 Oct 11
0
Hint for nslookup wanted ...
> -----Original Message-----
> From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On
> Behalf Of Walter H.
> Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2016 9:05 AM
> To: centos at centos.org
> Subject: [CentOS] Hint for nslookup wanted ...
>
> Hello,
>
> has anybody a hint for me, how I can use nslookup to get
> either IPv6 AAAA only or both A and AAAA
2014 Aug 29
0
(no subject)
On 8/27/2014 18:05, Bill Cunningham wrote:
> I have just jined this list. I can't seem to boot from a USB and my
> BIOS
> recognizes my sandisk USB by name. I can't figure out what modules to use.
> mbr.bin and parted is one method. Then syslinux is run and a
> syslinux.cfg is
> needed. Is this sufficent for syslinux?
>
> LINUX bzImage //kernel image
> INITRD
2019 Aug 05
9
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
On 05/08/2019 11:53, Patrik wrote:
> the ?? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com
> <http://patrikx3.com/>"; are my domain names A, AAAA, CNAME-s, that is
> where i store then, there is know AD records at all. it is all DLZ.
> *_
> _*
If 'patrikx3.com' is a registered dns domain name, then you should have
used a subdomain of this for the AD dns
2008 May 27
2
mbox From escaping implementation ?
Hello,
I read in the wiki (http://wiki.dovecot.org/MailboxFormat/mbox) about
"From Escaping":
"Dovecot doesn't currently do this escaping however. Instead it
prevents this confusion by adding Content-Length headers so it knows
later where the next message begins. Dovecot doesn't either remove the
'>' characters before sending the data to clients. Both of these
2009 Oct 26
17
[Bug 1667] New: sshd slow connect with 'UseDNS yes'
https://bugzilla.mindrot.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1667
Summary: sshd slow connect with 'UseDNS yes'
Product: Portable OpenSSH
Version: 5.2p1
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: major
Priority: P2
Component: sshd
AssignedTo: unassigned-bugs at mindrot.org
ReportedBy:
2019 Aug 05
6
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
On 05/08/2019 10:14, Patrik wrote:
> I am not using flatfiles and i using BIND_DLZ it shows in my log and i
> do not use flatfiles. BIND_DLZ only.
Oh yes you are, you have this in your /etc/bind/named.conf.local :
??? zone "patrikx3.com" {
??????? type master;
??????? file "/etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com";
??????? include
2008 Dec 29
4
DNS resolver over IPv6
I have a Centos server that is running BIND and has IPv6 global addresses.
I have entered a number of AAAA records into this copy of BIND in a
local view and zone (tld is htt).
Over IPv4, I have no trouble with nslookup ('nslookup - 127.0.0.1' and
'nslookup - 192.168.128.55'). I get the AAAA records back.
But if I try to use the IPv6 address of the system I get a time out.
2008 Mar 21
2
simple DNS question - reverse nslookup fails.
Hello all,
I am trying to configure a subdomain DNS server on a Cent OS 5.1 - for
my lab. Brief configuration:
Lab machine ---> 192.168.17.2 (should respond to DNS queries from
hosts in 192.168.16.0/20 network)
1. I would also like to forward any queries outside the above network
to our corporate domain (no firewalls between our 192.168.16.x network
and the corporate network. The domain
2016 Oct 09
2
member server nslookup
I just transfered fsmo roles from one DC to my newer DC and all went
well. Thank you Samba team!! Great documentation, BTW.
My domain (basically) consists of one ADDC, one member server and two
W10 clients and one W7 client.
While setting up the newer DC had been running some nslookup on the DC's
and decided to run nslookup on my member server and do not know if I
have discovered and
2016 Jun 30
2
DNS Suddenly breaking
nslookup google.com
;; Got recursion not available from 192.168.1.236, trying next server
Server: 192.168.1.235
Address: 192.168.1.235#53
Non-authoritative answer:
Name: google.com
Address: 172.217.4.78
Interesting little bit about the "Recursion not available"
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:52 AM, lingpanda101 at gmail.com <
lingpanda101 at gmail.com> wrote:
>
2016 Aug 04
2
Samba 4.2.14 Group Policy (GPO) sync error
Perhaps I am on the wrong track but I would like to share some
additional observations...
I quickly enabled DNS query logging:
# rndc querylog
Then run another gpupdate on the client.
During the Update I see lots of queries:
04-Aug-2016 14:46:58.414 queries: info: client 10.0.1.186#59270
(_ldap._tcp.Default-First-Site-Name._sites.dc._msdcs.ad.cyberdyne.local):
view internal: query:
2016 Jun 30
2
DNS Suddenly breaking
Hosts:
127.0.0.1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost4
localhost4.localdomain4
::1 localhost localhost.localdomain localhost6
localhost6.localdomain6
192.168.1.235 bus-ny-dc-01.domain.domain.com bus-ny-dc-01
Resolv:
# Generated by NetworkManager
search domain.domain.com
nameserver 192.168.1.236
nameserver 192.168.1.235
Smb.conf:
# Global parameters
[global]
workgroup =
2016 Jun 30
2
DNS Suddenly breaking
from both DC:
dig google.com
dig @8.8.8.8 google.com
First dig will use resolvers declared into /etc/resolv.conf.
Second dig forces usage of 8.8.8.8.
Both commands should reply the same things, on all DC.
2016-06-30 15:58 GMT+02:00 lingpanda101 at gmail.com <lingpanda101 at gmail.com>:
> On 6/30/2016 9:57 AM, Garland McAlexander wrote:
>
>> nslookup google.com
2020 Aug 13
3
Samba DNS fails when queried with nslookup commands
Hai James,
Thanks, thats exactly what we needed.
I'll comment below.
> -----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
> Van: James Atwell [mailto:james.atwell365 at gmail.com]
> Verzonden: donderdag 13 augustus 2020 14:46
> Aan: samba at lists.samba.org
> CC: L.P.H. van Belle
> Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Samba DNS fails when queried with
> nslookup commands
>
> Hi Louis and
2019 Aug 05
3
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
On 05/08/2019 12:33, Patrik wrote:
> the patrikx3.com <http://patrikx3.com> is my domain
> my AD DC domain is p3x-dc.patrikx3.com <http://p3x-dc.patrikx3.com>,
> you can see:
>
Unless you have done something strange like using 'p3x-dc' as the
subdomain of 'patrikx3.com', that isn't your AD dns domain, it the FQDN
of your AD DC.
Rowland
2019 Aug 05
0
samba dlz. bind9 nslookup is wrong
the patrikx3.com is my domain
my AD DC domain is p3x-dc.patrikx3.com, you can see:
root at server:~# cat /etc/bind/zones/enp1s0f3/patrikx3.com
; Replaces on ennp1s0f2 to ennp1s0f3
; 192.168.81. 192.168.78.
; 2001:470:1f1b:5b5:21b:21ff:fea6:ce92
2001:470:1f1b:5b3:21b:21ff:fea6:ce93
; format is done with xed Linux Mint, not using tab, only space
$TTL 3600
@
2020 Aug 12
7
Samba DNS fails when queried with nslookup commands
Hello,
???? Having issues with a DC not responding to DNS requests. OS is
Ubuntu 18.04.4 LTS. Samba version 4.12.2 compiled from source. Checking
to see what is listening on port 53 reports;
@soldc4:~# netstat -tulpn | grep ":53"
tcp??????? 0????? 0 127.0.0.53:53 0.0.0.0:*?????????????? LISTEN?????
2935/systemd-resolv
tcp6?????? 0????? 0 :::53 :::*??????????????????? LISTEN?????