similar to: mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 700 matches similar to: "mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified"

2016 Oct 03
0
mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was specified
On Sun, Oct 02, 2016 at 11:42:41PM -0400, Tim Dunphy wrote: > Hey guys, > > My NFS server has been working really well for a long time now. Both > client and server run CentOS 7.2. > > However when I just had to remount one of my home directories on an NFS > client, I'm now getting the error when I run mount -a > > mount.nfs: an incorrect mount option was
2007 Aug 14
3
NFS / DNS problem
Hi all, Today we have had a strange problem that has taken down our website, we understand what happened but not why so I am hoping someone has seen this before. We have our web servers (web1 web2 web3 ..... web10) mounting an NFS share (/export/data) from server nfs1. On the web server side we use autofs in the format nfs-dedicated:/export/data where nfs-dedicated is an alias in our
2015 Apr 02
1
mounted NFS does not show in df -h
Hey guys, This is kind of odd, so I wanted to do a sanity check. I mounted an NFS share like so: [root at web1:~] #mount -t nfs nfs1.jokefire.com:/home /mnt/home Seemed to go ok. Then I took a look at the output of df -h and didn't see it! [root at web1:~] #df -h Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/vda 40G 24G 14G 64% / devtmpfs
2017 Dec 20
2
glusterfs, ganesh, and pcs rules
Hi, I've just created again the gluster with NFS ganesha. Glusterfs version 3.8 When I run the command gluster nfs-ganesha enable - it returns a success. However, looking at the pcs status, I see this: [root at tlxdmz-nfs1 ~]# pcs status Cluster name: ganesha-nfs Stack: corosync Current DC: tlxdmz-nfs2 (version 1.1.16-12.el7_4.5-94ff4df) - partition with quorum Last updated: Wed Dec 20
2017 Dec 21
0
glusterfs, ganesh, and pcs rules
Hi, In your ganesha-ha.conf do you have your virtual ip adresses set something like this?: VIP_tlxdmz-nfs1="192.168.22.33" VIP_tlxdmz-nfs2="192.168.22.34" Renaud De?: gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org [mailto:gluster-users-bounces at gluster.org] De la part de Hetz Ben Hamo Envoy??: 20 d?cembre 2017 04:35 ??: gluster-users at gluster.org Objet?: [Gluster-users]
2017 Dec 24
1
glusterfs, ganesh, and pcs rules
I checked, and I have it like this: # Name of the HA cluster created. # must be unique within the subnet HA_NAME="ganesha-nfs" # # The gluster server from which to mount the shared data volume. HA_VOL_SERVER="tlxdmz-nfs1" # # N.B. you may use short names or long names; you may not use IP addrs. # Once you select one, stay with it as it will be mildly unpleasant to # clean up
2000 Jun 20
2
Multiple Services on one Server
Newbie question! We currently are running a product call TAS from Syntax Corporation and would like to move to Samba. I have review the documentation and cannot find how to set up muliple services on one server. I tried using the Netbios name = and the include statement to bring in another smb.conf file but I don't think I'm on the right track.
2011 Oct 10
2
can't snapshot
Good morning Btrfs list, I am trying to create a subvolume of a directory tree (approximately 1.1 million subvolumes under nfs1). The following error is thrown and without the wiki I don''t know what argument is needed. I am running kernel 3.1.0-rc4. [root@btrfs ~]# btrfs sub snapshot /btrfs/nfs1/ /btrfs/snaps/ Invalid arguments for subvolume snapshot [root@btrfs ~]# btrfs sub list
2008 Oct 07
2
1.1.4 and trouble over NFS
Hello, I have some trouble with the current setup (it's a testing environment): 2 server with Dovecot 1.1.4 from source (OS Debian testing 2.6.26) (name: "exim" and "exim2") 1 NFS server (OS Debian testing 2.6.26) I use NFS v.4, indexes shared over NFS. The relavant part of Dovecot configuration: dotlock_use_excl = yes mail_nfs_storage = yes mail_nfs_index = yes
2011 Oct 14
2
snapshot issues
Good afternoon btrfs, I have been having issues with snapshots not reading the whole file tree below them. I have installed new btrfs-progs from git://git.darksatanic.net/repo/btrfs-progs-unstable.git made and installed them. My tree is: /Btrfs | |__ nfs1 | |__ data |
2015 Jul 14
2
ssh failed only with nfs home directory
Hey all, Having a weird ssh issue I'd like some opinions on. If I have my home directory mounted on the NFS server itself, I get permission denied when I try to ssh into it. The correct permissions and ownership are on the home directory, ssh directory and the authorized_users file. Here's what a verbose ssh session looks like: #ssh -v bluethundr at nfs1.example.com OpenSSH_6.2p2,
2010 Jun 21
3
NFS performance - default rsize
Hi list, We've had an interesting NFS performance issue with the following setup. Clients : CentOS 5.5, kernel 2.6.18-194.el5 Server : Solaris 10 kernel Generic_142901-08 Reading a file (not cached) with dd : dd if=file1 of=/dev/null bs=1024k count=100 performance is around.. 700 kB/s ! /proc/mounts shows rsize has been negotiated to 1mB If we force rsize to a smaller value, 32kB, the
2014 Aug 01
2
Live blockcopy onto storage pool that is an NFS mount?
Hello, I am running qemu-kvm 1.4.0 and libvirt 1.0.2 on Ubuntu 12.04. I have two NFS mountpoints configured as two separate pools in virsh: <pool type='dir'> <name>nfs1</name> <uuid>419d799c-2493-6ebc-6848-53b0919e7bad</uuid> <capacity unit='bytes'>6836057014272</capacity> <allocation unit='bytes'>0</allocation>
2014 Jan 06
0
nfs client kerberos cache
Greetings, Not sure if this is the correct mail list. I have the following test environment set up: - 1x ipa master = ipa1.example.com - 1x nfs server = nfs1.example.com - 1x nfs client = nfsclient1.example.com NFS version 4 is used and the appropriate Kerberos principal has been created in IPA: [root at nfs1 ~]# ipa service-show nfs/nfs1.example.com at EXAMPLE.COM Principal:
2014 Jan 13
0
[resolved ]nfs client kerberos cache
2014/1/6 Darod Zyree <darodzyree at gmail.com> > Greetings, > > Not sure if this is the correct mail list. > > I have the following test environment set up: > - 1x ipa master = ipa1.example.com > - 1x nfs server = nfs1.example.com > - 1x nfs client = nfsclient1.example.com > > NFS version 4 is used and the appropriate Kerberos principal has been > created in
2019 May 06
1
dfree command cannot report correct disk space
Hi, my  filesystems is mounted like the below df output, /share is exported in samba. Filesystem                     Size  Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1                       50G  9.1G   41G  19% /share nfs1:/                          492T  433T   59T  89% /share/group1 If a 100G file is copied to /share/group1, samba will report the storage doesn't have enough space. I tried to
2010 Jan 25
2
autofs with nfs plus local directories
Hi, I have a autofs configured to mount home dir from NFS. All user accounts lookup is done using LDAP. All is working fine with this setup. Now I need to create a local user account and have its home dir also on local system. So I added a new user account and changed auto.home as follows: test1 -rw,hard,intr /home/test1 * -rw,hard,intr nfs1:/export/users/& But this
2008 Jan 25
2
strange xen memory calculations?
Hi, I have started the xen kernel with parameter dom0_mem=300M. xm info | grep total total_memory : 2045 Name ID Mem VCPUs State Time(s) Domain-0 0 300 2 r----- 292.1 FTP 822 1 56.7 LDAP 1 822 1 r----- 541.3 NFS1 822 1 14.8 NFS2 822 1 1.4 For the
2008 Jun 11
1
software raid performance
Are there known performance issues with using glusterfs on software raid? I've been playing with a variety of configs (AFR, AFR with Unify) on a two server setup. Everything seems to work well, but performance (creating files, reading files, appending to files) is very slow. Using the same configs on two non-software raid machines shows significant performance increases. Before I go a
2003 Sep 04
0
security issues wint smbmount
Dear sirs/madams, I am using smbmount (mount -t smbfs) version 2.2.8a for mounting shares from a Windows 2003 server on a Linux machine. This works fine, but there seems to be a security problem; ordinary users can write to files, even when the Unix protection does not allow this. The user cannot remove the file or create a new one, but can do what he/she wants with an existing one. Is this a