similar to: Firefox 45.4.0-1 for CentOS-6 and CentOS-7

On 12/20/2016 06:08 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: > On 2016-12-19, ken <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: >> Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. >> Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three >> times. That comes to it being usable for about five minutes before it >> crashes. >> >> Anyone

I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. Thanks for the effort! LF

On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 8:17 PM Akemi Yagi <amyagi at gmail.com> wrote: > On Sat, Sep 19, 2020 at 8:04 PM William Markuske <wmarkuske at gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > I ... have come to find out that RedHat deprecated support for a number > of HBAs for 8 including all running the SAS2004 chip. > > > > Does anyone know if there

i'm reading the lowdown on 3rd party repos with respect to centos here: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories and i have a couple questions and observations. first, the entry for centosplus reads: "Popular packages from this repository include: postfix with database support, a rebuilt kernel with additional drivers & filesystem support, php5 and mysql5."

On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 3:04 PM, <cpolish at surewest.net> wrote: > On 2016-05-17 12:09, jd1008 wrote: >> Has anybody enabled this repo? >> I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades >> as the dependencies are rather different. > > I've had the CentOSPlus repository enabled for CentOS6 for more > than a year with no problems. I don't

On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 1:03 AM John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Sun, Sep 20, 2020 at 12:24 AM John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> strikes me, MPT2 support should find its home in the CentOSPlus kernel >> for 8. >> > > > ooof. IS there a CentOSplus 8 ?? >

On 02/04/2017 06:55 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > I known its lower prioritized but any signs of the centosplus > version of firefox? Just asking because of the severity class. > The CentOS Plus version of Firefox was released because of the decision upstream to disable ffmpeg. The newest upstream release re-enabled ffmpeg, so the CentOS Plus version is no longer needed. Use the latest

> Am 20.12.2016 um 14:36 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > > On 12/20/2016 06:08 AM, Liam O'Toole wrote: >> On 2016-12-19, ken <gebser at mousecar.com> wrote: >>> Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. >>> Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three >>> times.

Hi, Small correction there. Example 4 of section 2 (how to use XFS with CentOSPlus kernel) says you should use this configuration line in [centosplus] section of yum: includepkgs=kernel* xfs* dmapi* However, the XFS module's package name is kmod-xfs*, so I believe it should actually be: includepkgs=kernel* kmod-xfs* xfs* dmapi* I did this on a system of mine, and in the first case it did

good day, I have tried to install mplayer according to instructions from the following sites..: http://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories/RPMForge http://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/MultimediaOnCentOS Then last..: [root at johan ~]# yum install libdvdcss libdvdread libdvdplay libdvdnav lsdvd mplayerplug-in mplayer mplayer-gui compat-libstdc++-33 flash-plugin

Helo, I'm trying to update a centos server with a kernel form the centos.plus repro because it contain Firewire/IEEE1394 support. But when y do a : # yum update The kernel from the base is more recent thant the centos plus repro I have tried with the http://wiki.centos.org/PackageManagement/Yum/Priorities plug-in and it didn't take the right kernel :

I was able to get h.264 support on www.youtube.com/html5 on fedora 21 by installing gstreamer1-libav but that package does not exist in C6 (or it's popular third party repos) What is the name of the package which adds h.264 to firefox on youtube/html5 in C6?

John Hodrien wrote: > On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> I haven't gone past 38, because when the 45 update came out, and >> video...like, say, my *required* training from work, when I tried to >> run it, it crashed firefox. Repeatedly. 100% of the time. >> >> Has anyone been using the current version had trouble with video, etc? >>

Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three times. That comes to it being usable for about five minutes before it crashes. Anyone else getting this?

On Sun, 1 Oct 2017 20:02:08 -0400 Mark LaPierre wrote: > What repo did you find ffmpeg-libs in? Version : 2.6.8 Release : 3.el7.nux Architecture: x86_64 Install Date: Wed 27 Apr 2016 06:23:09 PM CST Group : Unspecified Size : 13562904 License : GPLv2+ Signature : RSA/SHA1, Wed 27 Apr 2016 06:35:00 AM CST, Key ID e98bfbe785c6cd8a Source RPM :

Am 01.10.2017 um 12:28 schrieb hw: > Roman Kennke <roman at kennke.org> writes: > >> Hello, >> >> I am trying to get MP4/H.264 playback in Firefox to work on my CentOS >> laptop (for vimeo). >> >> I installed the gstreamer plugins as described here: >> >> https://wiki.centos.org/TipsAndTricks/MultimediaOnCentOS7 >> >> (No, I

Has anybody enabled this repo? I understand that it can really mess up updates and upgrades as the dependencies are rather different.

Hi all, Does anyone know if CentOS 4.7 will support PHP5 natively? I have searched centos.org site, but can't see anything related to this? -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers

I'm going to rebuild my workstation because maintaining it is now a nightmare after using "recommended" repo's that now conflict with each other. Every time I do a yum update I it fails with conflicts. I'm looking for new recommendations for which repo's to use to have a stable Centos 7 workstation. Much like Centos itself, most of the web pages are very old now.

Hi, Merged the XOS Team fixes for firefox 1.0 and made a CentOS-3 version of few hours ago released CentOS-4 update. The CentOS-3 version is actually only .spec file mod from CentOS-4, so it should be pretty much same. ... that is IF someone is crazy enought to run firefox under hercules or real iron - at least you can as the binary is available :) s390: