similar to: PHP vulnerability CVE-2016-4073

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "PHP vulnerability CVE-2016-4073"

2016 Sep 21
3
PHP vulnerability CVE-2016-4073
On 2016-Sep-21 14:35, Adrian Sevcenco wrote: > On 09/21/2016 02:02 PM, ?????? wrote: > > Hello, > > > > My server with CentOS 6.8 just failed PCI scan, so I'm looking into > > vulnerable packages. PHP 5.3.3 have multiple vulnerabilities, some of > > them are fixed/patched or have some kind of workaround. But I can't find > > a way to fix this one.
2016 Sep 24
0
PHP vulnerability CVE-2016-4073
On 09/23/2016 04:42 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > Of course this is where Red Hat intends SCL to fill the gap of the > "supported" new httpd24 and php56 on RHEL ... > > https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/15 > > Unfortunately this is having a knock on effect in the EPEL world > where, since Fedora has no SCL packaging guidelines and RHSCL is not > included in repos
2017 Sep 22
3
owncloud on CentOS - I have problems installing/updating recently
> -----Original Message----- > From: CentOS [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On Behalf Of Valeri > Galtsev > Sent: den 21 september 2017 17:25 > To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> > Subject: Re: [CentOS] owncloud on CentOS - I have problems > installing/updating recently > > > On Thu, September 21, 2017 1:00 am, Sorin Srbu wrote: > >>
2016 May 22
5
Fwd: EPEL-ANNOUNCE Re: Upcoming OwnCloud changes in EPEL
On 5/21/2016 6:03 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > i started to look at SCL and got lost pretty quickly. I'm not > running OwnCloud but I've got some other php stuff thats getting > increasingly unhappy about the stock c6 php... ok, I've installed php54-1.1-5.el6.centos.alt.x86_64 ... if I run `scl enable php54`, will that connect it up to my existing apache, so it just
2016 May 22
2
Fwd: EPEL-ANNOUNCE Re: Upcoming OwnCloud changes in EPEL
On 22 Apr 2016 18:11, "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > > In the event that there are CentOS users making use of the EPEL owncloud packages, but not following the EPEL mailing lists, please read the mail below with regards to your installations. > > Thanks > > James > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: "James
2017 Sep 19
7
CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma
Hi, I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or Nextcloud on a RHEL/CentOS server is confronted with a version dilemma. 1. CentOS 7 sports PHP 5.4, which has
2017 Sep 19
3
CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma
On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 07:59:00PM +0200, rainer at ultra-secure.de wrote: > With PHP, I try to stay as close to upstream as possible. > If upstream EOLs a version, it's time to upgrade. > > If you want something stable, don't run PHP. Unfortunately, with that philosophy but not much systems management experience, you end up with custom-compiled and local installs of PHP that
2016 Sep 21
0
PHP vulnerability CVE-2016-4073
https://pci.qualys.com/static/help/merchant/questionnaires/compensating_controls_definition.htm Eero 2016-09-21 14:02 GMT+03:00 ?????? <proxy-one at mail.ru>: > Hello, > > My server with CentOS 6.8 just failed PCI scan, so I'm looking into > vulnerable packages. PHP 5.3.3 have multiple vulnerabilities, some of > them are fixed/patched or have some kind of workaround.
2014 Apr 03
1
Difference between ruby193 CentOS SCL and ruby193 softwarecollections.org SCL
? I've found that in https://softwarecollections.org/repos/rhscl/ruby193/epel-6-x86_64/ is passenger included but in http://dev.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/ruby193/ is not. What is the differences between this two repos? ? Thanks, Filip Bartmann
2017 Dec 11
6
upgrading python
On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote: > > On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 14:16 +0100, Kai Grunau wrote: > >> On 05.12.2017 14:05, Larry Martell wrote: > >> > I am running CentOS 7 and I have python version: > >> > > >> >
2017 Sep 19
3
CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma
On Tue, September 19, 2017 1:42 pm, Nux! wrote: > Unfortunately the same can be said about Ruby, RoR, Python etc etc etc. It is not as much true about languages themselves (though it is true, and I for one call python "sneaky snake" just because of that ;-), as about how the software using these languages is written. E.g. well known mailman. I never had it give me any trouble
2019 Feb 14
3
Geany 1.34
On Thu, 14 Feb 2019 at 12:47, H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > On 02/14/2019 05:58 PM, Tate Belden wrote: > > FWIW, on Fedora 29, I'm running Geany 1.34.1 and didn't have to enable > > anything other than the default repositories. So, it'd appear to at least > > be in the stream. > > > > geany-1.34.1-2.fc29.x86_64 > > > > On
2019 Sep 11
4
Need to update gcc to version >=6 on CentOS 7 ?
$ sudo yum install devtoolset-7 Loaded plugins: fastestmirror, langpacks Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: mirror.vcu.edu * epel: mirror.siena.edu * extras: mirror.vcu.edu * updates: mirror.vcu.edu No package devtoolset-7 available. Error: Nothing to do On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:17 PM Gordon Messmer <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 9/11/19 9:05 AM,
2019 Sep 11
2
Need to update gcc to version >=6 on CentOS 7 ?
I need to build u-boot on my CentOS 7 machine but encounter this: > *** Your GCC is older than 6.0 and is not supported I've updated the installation on my machine but the current version is: > gcc (GCC) 4.8.5 20150623 (Red Hat 4.8.5-36) How do I go about updating gcc to version 6 or greater on my CentOS 7 machine? And do so safely?
2017 Dec 12
2
upgrading python
On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:32 PM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 11, 2017 at 4:25 PM, Clint Dilks <clintd at scms.waikato.ac.nz> wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 10:09 AM, Larry Martell <larry.martell at gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 8:22 AM, Pete Biggs <pete at biggs.org.uk> wrote:
2017 Dec 05
2
upgrading python
On Tue, 2017-12-05 at 14:16 +0100, Kai Grunau wrote: > On 05.12.2017 14:05, Larry Martell wrote: > > I am running CentOS 7 and I have python version: > > > > Python 2.7.5 (default, Sep 15 2016, 22:37:39) > > > > I need a newer version of 2.7 to pick up a bug fix. How can I do that > > (without breaking anything in CentOS)? > > you could use the
2017 Feb 06
3
GCC 4.9 in CentOS 7 ??
The following features of the C++11/C++14 standards are not supported by g++: * std::make_unique function (C++14) * digit separators (C++14) * binary literals (C++14) * generic lambdas (C++14) If you are using the GNU C compiler collection (gcc) then you need at least v4.9.x. configure: error: support for required C++11/C++14 features incomplete Is there by chance a compat package
2017 Sep 19
2
CentOS, PHP & OwnCloud/Nextcloud: the version dilemma
Am 19.09.2017 um 09:36 schrieb Nicolas Kovacs <info at microlinux.fr>: > > I'm currently experimenting with OwnCloud and Nextcloud on a sandbox > CentOS 7 server. I've been using OwnCloud for the last two years for my > own purposes on a Slackware server, and I'm quite happy with it. > > In my humble opinion, every admin who wants to host OwnCloud or >
2020 Jun 21
4
php 5.6 on CentOS 6
I am in the process of moving various apps and data off a CentOS 6 server to a new server running CentOS 7. As part of the migration process I need to upgrade an app and corresponding data files which requires php 5.6. I do have php 5.5 (and 5.4) installed since earlier but now tried to install php 5.6 from SCL which failed. This is the package I tried:
2016 Sep 21
0
PHP vulnerability CVE-2016-4073
On 09/21/2016 02:02 PM, ?????? wrote: > Hello, > > My server with CentOS 6.8 just failed PCI scan, so I'm looking into > vulnerable packages. PHP 5.3.3 have multiple vulnerabilities, some of > them are fixed/patched or have some kind of workaround. But I can't find > a way to fix this one. Red Hat state: under investigation. > >