similar to: Centos v6.8 and double received bytes

On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:24?AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 10:19:34 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 16, 2023 at 10:16?AM Xuan Zhuo <xuanzhuo at linux.alibaba.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 16 Aug 2023 09:13:48 +0800, Jason Wang <jasowang at redhat.com> wrote: >

On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: > > On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> said: > >> Hi, >> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for >> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly >> awaiting >> the same for 6.7. >> >> Thanks!

Hi, Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly awaiting the same for 6.7. Thanks! -->Pat

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=744 Summary: set:list behavior Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org ReportedBy: martinbarrowcliff

Patrick Rael wrote: > On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> >> said: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for >>> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly >>>

On 05/11/2016 11:44 AM, Patrick Rael wrote: > On 05/11/2016 09:45 AM, Steve Snyder wrote: >> >> On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> >> said: >> >>> Hi, >>> Is there an ETA on the openssl security update >>> (CVE-2016-0799) for >>> CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for

On Wednesday, May 11, 2016 11:20am, "Patrick Rael" <prael at lumeta.com> said: > Hi, > Is there an ETA on the openssl security update (CVE-2016-0799) for > CentOS 6.7? I saw the openssl update for CentOS 7 on 5/9, eagerly > awaiting > the same for 6.7. > > Thanks! Looks like Red Hat pushed it to RHEL v6.8, released yesterday. Unless CentOS does a

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=731 Summary: Allow duplicate IPs with different MACs in bitmap:ip.mac Product: ipset Version: unspecified Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: enhancement Priority: P5 Component: default AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at lists.netfilter.org

On Tue, Feb 13, 2024 at 06:39:20PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > On 2/9/24 19:52, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Fri, Feb 09, 2024 at 06:41:32PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > On 2/6/24 15:03, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 05, 2024 at 11:00:04PM +0100, Danilo Krummrich wrote: > > > > > On 2/5/24 22:08, Dave Airlie wrote: > > >

http://bugzilla.netfilter.org/show_bug.cgi?id=729 Summary: iptables + ipset rules apply but nothing go to the chain Product: iptables Version: unspecified Platform: x86_64 OS/Version: Debian GNU/Linux Status: NEW Severity: critical Priority: P2 Component: iptables AssignedTo: netfilter-buglog at

Forward declare struct backlight_device and remove the include statement. Signed-off-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann at suse.de> Reviewed-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula at intel.com> --- include/linux/fb.h | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/include/linux/fb.h b/include/linux/fb.h index 2ce2f5c2fca9a..7380d959c5d53 100644 --- a/include/linux/fb.h +++