similar to: dm-0: WRITE SAME failed. Manually zeroing

All,This happens on all of our CentOS 7 VMs.? but as stated in the email trail, the file softlockup_thresh does not exist.? Should it be added?? What is the best way to get rid of this behavior. Thanks in advance and sorry if I missed something along the way.KM From: correomm <correomm at gmail.com> To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> Sent: Thursday, August 18,

This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware ESXi 5.1. The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh (timeout error). The details of last issues was reported to retrace.fedoraproject.org. ?Do you have a hint? [root at vmguest ~]# abrt-cli list id

> 2016-08-18 12:39 GMT-04:00 correomm <correomm at gmail.com>: > >> This bug is reported only on the VM's with CentOS 7 running on on VMware >> ESXi 5.1. >> The vSphere performance graph shows high CPU consume and disk activity only >> on VM's with CentOS 7. Sometimes I can not connect remotely with ssh >> (timeout error). >> > I'm

I want to know the right command to type from a bash shell so that i can 1) Check the version of my cent os 2) Check all the open ports (tcp and udp) on my machine 3) Open a specific port say port 3306 so that a telnet request from a remote machiene can be accepted 4) Disable the effect of 3 above in case I want to Thanks in anticiaption of your kind responses to the questions

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:25:47PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:50 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:07:33PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > This makes sense if the device is backed by a block device on oVirt side, > > > and the NBD support efficient zeroing. But in this case the device

Hi, Please help me understand the following applications and what are its advantages if we compare between each of them. Asterisk, FreeSWITCH, TrixBox, SER, OpenSER, sipX, CallWeaver, and YATE. Regards, Kaushal -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20120103/ffad2be6/attachment.htm>

We now have true zeroing support in oVirt imageio, thanks for that. However a problem is that ‘qemu-img convert’ issues zero requests for the whole disk before starting the transfer. It does this using 32 MB requests which take approx. 1 second each to execute on the oVirt side. Two problems therefore: (1) Zeroing the disk can take a long time (eg. 40 GB is approx. 20 minutes).

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:07:33PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > This makes sense if the device is backed by a block device on oVirt side, > and the NBD support efficient zeroing. But in this case the device is backed > by an empty sparse file on NFS, and oVirt does not support yet efficient > zeroing, we just write zeros manually. > > I think should be handled on virt-v2v plugin

Hi, Is there any existing support/on going work for zeroing buffers in llvm infrastructure? (either in the form of intrinsics or IR code buffer erasure?) My basic "grep" did not show up any. Please let me know any info on this. I will be glad to hear out! -- Anitha

I have spatial data on a sphere (the Earth) for which I would like to run an gls model assuming that the errors are autcorrelated, i.e. including a corSpatial correlation in the model specification. In this case the distance metric should be calculated on the sphere, therefore metric = "euclidean" in (for example) corSpher would be incorrect. I would be grateful for help on how to

On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 3:34 AM David Chisnall <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > > Thanks, > > On 07/08/2020 23:28, Kees Cook wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 7, 2020 at 1:18 AM David Chisnall > > <David.Chisnall at cl.cam.ac.uk> wrote: > >> I think it would be useful for the discussion to have a clear threat model that this intends to defend against and

On 04/10/2018 09:07 AM, Nir Soffer wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:48 PM Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote: > >> Am 10.04.2018 um 15:03 hat Nir Soffer geschrieben: >>> On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> We now have true zeroing support in oVirt imageio, thanks for that.

Am 10.04.2018 um 15:03 hat Nir Soffer geschrieben: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > wrote: > > > We now have true zeroing support in oVirt imageio, thanks for that. > > > > However a problem is that ‘qemu-img convert’ issues zero requests for > > the whole disk before starting the transfer. It does this using 32 MB

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 4:48 PM Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com> wrote: > Am 10.04.2018 um 15:03 hat Nir Soffer geschrieben: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > We now have true zeroing support in oVirt imageio, thanks for that. > > > > > > However a problem is that ‘qemu-img

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 6:53 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 03:25:47PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:50 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> > > wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:07:33PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > > > > This makes sense if the device is backed

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 5:50 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:07:33PM +0000, Nir Soffer wrote: > > This makes sense if the device is backed by a block device on oVirt side, > > and the NBD support efficient zeroing. But in this case the device is > backed > > by an empty sparse file on NFS, and oVirt does not support yet

Hello, The last weekend, the VM with CentOS 7 (kernel-3.10.0-327.28.2.el7.x86_64) was running with 2.5GB of used memory, but without users connected, and heavy services running. Three minutes after reboot, the o.s. is running with 114MB used. ?Why the 62% of memory is used if the o.s. does not have an intensive load? top sorted by memory: top - 12:55:34 up 8 days, 21:41, 1 user, load

Anyone know where I can find a good chrooted named module for centos? Named as chroot is ugly... soft and hard links everywhere... Doug -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Puppet Users" group. To post to this group, send email to puppet-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to

On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 1:44 PM Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote: > We now have true zeroing support in oVirt imageio, thanks for that. > > However a problem is that ‘qemu-img convert’ issues zero requests for > the whole disk before starting the transfer. It does this using 32 MB > requests which take approx. 1 second each to execute on the oVirt side. >

Hi: I''m having a problem with this list and it''s that I can''t see my own emails and don''t know the cause. I check my configuration in Google Groups and it says that "Email: send each message to me as it arrives" so any help or tip? I just only see the reply from members lists but not my email so when I try to follow a thread sometimes I''m