similar to: CentOS 6, portreserve

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 20000 matches similar to: "CentOS 6, portreserve"

2012 Apr 03
0
CEBA-2012:0447 CentOS 6 portreserve FASTTRACK Update
CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2012:0447 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2012-0447.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: c449d6c444a45c5edd1c9ec03c5b73697f71f6512b76948576244d9ad1cb3fc4 portreserve-0.0.4-9.el6.i686.rpm x86_64:
2017 Aug 30
1
rkhunter and prelink
in my prior message, that should be in rkhunter.conf On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:43 AM, Tony Schreiner <anthony.schreiner at bc.edu> wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting
2014 May 15
0
Fwd: For the CentOS list: rkhunter and NFS
---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: <m.roth at 5-cent.us> Date: Thu, May 15, 2014 at 3:40 PM Subject: For the CentOS list: rkhunter and NFS To: lesmikesell at gmail.com Hi, Les, Could you forward this to the CentOS list? That damn nixspam is blocking my hosting provider's mailhost *again*; it was on and off yesterday, and today it won't even let me remove it, and
2017 Aug 30
4
rkhunter and prelink
Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ] All file hash checks will be skipped because: This system uses prelinking, but the hash function command does not look like SHA1 or MD5. Now, googling, I find people saying to rm /etc/prelink.cache, then run rkhunter --propupd. Works. And then,
2015 Aug 07
2
semi-OT: rkhunter, fix "broken links"
Hi, folks, rkhunter is reporting a broken link on one of our servers. This is quite reasonable, since it's on a drive whose controller card I have declared dead the other day. I've been googling, searching in the manpage, and I've done an rkhunter --propupd, but it still finds the broken link. Anyone know how to remove the link from the rkhunter d/b? mark
2015 Aug 12
0
C6.7 evolution to cyrus imap(s) fails
> Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 22:22:22 +0100 > From: Dr J Austin <ja at maui.jaa.org.uk> > > > Many thanks to Alexander, Richard, Jonathan and m.roth > > The Magic incandation ! > > portrelease dovecot > service cyrus-imapd restart > > [root at maui:/etc/named]$ cat /etc/portreserve/dovecot > imap > imaps > pop3 > pop3s > > My
2017 Aug 30
0
rkhunter and prelink
This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line HASH_CMD=sha1sum On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from > rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning ] > All file hash checks will be skipped because: > This system uses
2017 Aug 30
0
rkhunter and prelink
On Wed, 2017-08-30 at 11:03 -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > > > > Can't remember if I posted this before...
2017 Aug 30
2
rkhunter and prelink
On Wed, August 30, 2017 10:43 am, Tony Schreiner wrote: > This has come up for me on the most recent upgrade, add the line > > HASH_CMD=sha1sum > > On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 11:15 AM, <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > >> Can't remember if I posted this before... We're getting warnings from >> rkhunterWarning: Checking for prerequisites [ Warning
2015 Aug 07
0
semi-OT: rkhunter, fix "broken links"
On Fri, 2015-08-07 at 09:45 -0400, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > > rkhunter is reporting a broken link on one of our servers. This is > quite reasonable, since it's on a drive whose controller card I have > declared dead the other day. I've been googling, searching in the > manpage, and I've done an rkhunter --propupd, but it still finds the >
2014 Jan 17
1
rkhunter
I updated java-1.7.0-openjdk a few hours ago - it *was* listed as a critical security update, and I don't want yelling from rkhunter. The man page tells me I can tell it rkhunter --propupd <package name>... but it doesn't know the name above as a package. Been googling a bit, and cannot find a good example of a package (other than the manpage's coreutil). Anyone got an example,
2015 Aug 12
1
C6.7 evolution to cyrus imap(s) fails
------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 14:16:03 +0100 > From: Dr J Austin <ja at maui.jaa.org.uk> > > On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Richard wrote: > >> >> I don't think that wireshark adds much to this. Unless you had a >> proxy in the middle, the "connection refused" responses already >> indicated that
2014 Apr 17
0
semi-OT:R and rkhunter
The latest version of rkhunter is complaining about "suspicious file types" in /dev/shm. Thing is, they're being created on the fly by R, and then seem to be a random name (5d1f...), and I have zero expectation that R will only create shm files beginning with those characters. For those running rkhunter, if you've run into something like this, how have you handled it - told
2006 Dec 02
1
How to install rkhunter properly
Hi list, after a bit of struggling I found out how to cleanly install rkhunter ... maybe this is useful for you: * Download rkhunter (I downloaded v 1.2.8) * mv /etc/rpm/platform /root/etc_rpm_platform * setarch i386 rpmbuild -ta --target=i386 rkhunter-1.2.8.tar.gz * mv /root/etc_rpm_platform /etc/rpm/platform * rpm -ivh /usr/src/redhat/RPMS/noarch/rkhunter-1.2.8-1.noarch.rpm * wget
2011 Mar 16
2
skype?
Well, at the urging of a friend who wants to talk face-to-face, I tried to install skype to my system at home (current CentOS 5.5). Got the fedora rpm; yum installed a library, then localinstalled skype, which is the current 2.1 beta. ldd shows an entry to linux-gate, which I don't have installed (or at least rpm tells me I don't). I try to run skype, and it complains about the version of
2014 Oct 08
1
Actual complaining: nixspam
John accused me of complaining about systemd... this here's *real* complaining. Several times every month, my email starts getting bounced by freakin' nixspam, because my giant hosting provider, that hosts millions of domains. Akemi has argued that nixspam works just fine (if so, then why did we get that spam a few weeks ago?). I've politely requested being put on a whitelist, and
2015 Aug 12
0
C6.7 evolution to cyrus imap(s) fails
On Wed, 12 Aug 2015, Richard wrote: > > I don't think that wireshark adds much to this. Unless you had a > proxy in the middle, the "connection refused" responses already > indicated that your connections were getting to the/a server, it's > just refusing the connections. > > Connections by name, especially short forms, are suspect unless you > can be
2006 Oct 30
2
Problem rkhunter v. 1.2.8 - CENTOS 4
Dear Friends, I am using CENTOS 4.3 - kernel 2.6.9-42.0.2.EL with rkhunter version 1.2.8, but the rkhunter program show me problem on file /bin/kill. I compare files /bin/kill with other CENTOS 4 and it has same size. ====================== SHOE LOG =========================== Rootkit Hunter 1.2.8 is running Mon, 30 Oct 2006 12:56:44 -0200 Determining OS... Ready Checking binaries *
2019 May 23
3
df
<rant> I *swear*, I may get aggravated enough to write a drh - d *real* h. Between C7, with all the /tmpfs, and this debian 18.04 that has a dozen /snap all showing up.... All I want it to display is physical drive partition space.... </rant> mark
2014 Apr 30
0
rkhunter 1.4.2 (epel) unary operator expected -ne found
Anyone seeing this? /etc/cron.daily/rkhunter: /usr/bin/rkhunter: regel 13967: [: eenzijdige operator werd verwacht, -ne gevonden Translating: line 13967 unary operator expected -ne found Line 13967 is: if [ `${IPCS_CMD} -u 2>/dev/null | awk -F' ' '/segments allocated/ {print $3}'` -ne 0 ]; then rkhunter 1.4.2 release 1.el6 from epel on a CentOS 6.5 Thanks Patrick