similar to: Mounting NFS subdirectories individually or just the parent?

There is a slight performance related reason for exporting disk partitions individually, the performance boost is server-side as Paul says. The advantage is that the no_subtree_check can be used without any additional security risk. It is probably the case that the /export/base/a is a partition, is exported with no_subtree_check, and therefore there is a small performance boost. Preventing

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016, Frank Thommen wrote: > Hello, > > does it in any respect (throughput/performance, cpu load, I/O load, > resilience, ...) matter, if one mounts subdirectories of an NFS (v3) export > into separate directories or if one just mounts the parent directory? > > I.e. like this: > > server: /export/base/a -> /mnt/a > server: /export/base/b ->

My CentOS box is my server for data and some services, including nfs shares. On my laptop I have folderviews displaying two directories on the server, via nfs mounts. An fstab line mounts each, such as: 192.168.0.40:/home /mnt/borg2_home nfs nosuid,exec,rw,bg,soft,intr 0 0 From the folderview I have no problem accessing the files and directories. Now comes the problem. I use kontact, with

Hi, I would like to use the NFSv4 ability to create a "root" filesystem with fsid=0, so that I don't have to refer to the whole path of the exported filesystem when I mount it. However I do *not* want this root filesystem to be mountable by any host. Is that possible and how? E.g Filesystem: /exports/data1 /exports/data2 /exports/data3 /etc/exports: /exports

Hi all, I've got some insanity with mounting an NFS share that before reloading my workstation afresh worked perfectly, but now refuses to mount. Actually there are two servers with shares mounted. (1) Mandrake 10.0 file server - two shares - mount perfectly (2) Fedora Core 3 - one share - can't mount to save my life! My workstation is CentOS 4. I reloaded it to get rid of the FC3

Thank you. Basically our problem are not the ACLs or their support per se, but that we have to manage a huge number of individual ACLS (several hundred users in more than hundred projects) in multi-petabyte filesystem and still have to keep overview and control. Our problem is more the management side. Effectively we are looking for a tool that helps us manage these permissions and we

On Fri, 26 May 2017, Christian, Mark wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does a fix has already been made in the CenOS RPM repositories for this >> Samba remote execution code vulnerability, CVE-2017-7494? > yes. samba-3.6.23-43.el6_9.x86_64.rpm And samba-*-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at

Is there a "proper" way to put in a pause after network initialization to make sure the network *really* is up? I've had this issue for a while with e1000 cards (even on 100MB networks), where the first NFS mount will fail b/c the network reports up but isn't, really. Now, I'm also seeing the same issue on cluster nodes hooked to a switch with jumbo frames enabled. I

I've got a CentOS 6 machine that's slated to go into production providing some web and development-repository services. Part of the environment is gitweb, which works as expected with one glitch: SELinux doesn't allow gitweb.cgi to query sssd to display who owns the repositories. The audit log entries are pretty straightforward, e.g., type=AVC msg=audit(XXXXXXXXXXXX): avc:

On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I might actually be able to have a workable answer: > > alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs' /usr/bin/df \ -x autofs -x binfmt_misc -x cgroup -x configfs -x debugfs \ -x devpts -x devtmpfs -x efivarfs -x hugetlbfs -x mqueue \ -x nfsd -x proc -x pstore -x rpc_pipefs -x securityfs \ -x selinuxfs -x sysfs -x tmpfs :-) --

Hi community, In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't. How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and plv8 projects) Thanks

Hello all! I'm brand new to the mailing list, and I've encountered an issue with the microcode_ctl package version 2.1-16 being installed during the CentOS 7.3 upgrade. It causes my servers to hard stop and they need to be forcibly powered off and back on again with the power button to continue. This RedHat thread https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1398698 details the issue,

Dear Experts, I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a storage cluster, or as a distributed filesystem. I made my own research of what I can do, but I hit a snag with my seemingly best choice, so I decided to stay away from it finally, and ask clever people what they would use. My requirements are: 1. I would like to have one big (say, comparable to petabyte)

Hello all, I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date information on this matter, and have found information that is anywhere from 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more up to date on the subject. Specifically configuring Sendmail SMTP authentication (_no smart host stuff_). I've got Sendmail 8.14 installed on a CentOS 7.3

On 03/08/2017 11:00 AM, Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Wed, 8 Mar 2017, Mark Weaver wrote: > > > Hello all, > > > > I've been googling my brains out since yesterday looking for up-to-date > > information on this matter, and have found information that is > anywhere from > > 15 to 5 years old. I'd really like some information that much more > up to

hope thus comes under the remit of this mailking list... We use puppet, and Im trying to come up with "code" that will create two user accounts with a shared groiup ID eg? user1 with UID 1000user 2 with UID 1001 but I would like them BOTH to share the GID of 2000 I've tried the following accounts::groups:? ? jointgroup:? ? ? ? gid: '2000' accounts::users: ? ? user1:? ? ? ?

On Mon, 12 Oct 2020, Alexandru Lazarev wrote: > Hi community, > In CentOS 7 there is such rpm (libcxx-devel - it seems from EPEL > repository), but in CentOS 8 it isn't. > > How is it possible to have it there as RPM? because alternative to build it > (libc++) from sources is a big headache (I need it in order to build v9 and > plv8 projects) Do you mean the

For those of you who are either part of the secret cabal, or are otherwise keeping track of it, there is a new version available. The current version of the cryptex is version 3.1. It's changed rather significantly in some areas.

Hi, I am user of CentOS 8. When can we expect an image on AWS? I am just learning AWS and would like to use CentOS 8 for that. thanks --- Lee

I am setting up a file server with CentOS 7. I'm seeing performance which is considerably slower than a similar server running CentOS 6.6. A 3Gb directory can be copied to/from the CentOS 6.6 server in about 50 seconds. The same directory takes about 270 seconds to copy to/from the CentOS 7 system. I see the same performance difference with NFS mounted file systems or using scp, so it