similar to: ?barracuda? listing in logwatch session 123 of user root.

On Tue, July 19, 2016 10:06 pm, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" > as a commercial product. Maybe it is your server that had been "barracuded"?

On 07/19/2016 10:06 PM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen > section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > > I have not problem with the emails it noted as > being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" > as a commercial product. > > I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda > software

On Tue, 19 Jul 2016, Jon LaBadie wrote: >My nightly logwatch report had a never before seen >section last night, "barracuda spam firewall". > >I have not problem with the emails it noted as >being rejected. But I've always thought of "barracuda" >as a commercial product. > >I have neither configured nor enabled any barracuda >software and

After the large update from 7.2 -> 7.3 there is one major problem, the amanda backup packages. Strange situation, the host is the amanda server is working fine at backing up all my remote clients. But it has an error backing up itself. The amanda packages did not change version (3.3.3) and I've done no configuration change. I'm not looking for help debugging this at the moment.

On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 03:14:12PM -0700, Warren Young wrote: > On Dec 14, 2018, at 2:30 PM, Jon LaBadie <jcu at labadie.us> wrote: > > > > After a recent large update, firewalld's status contains > > many lines of the form: > > > > WARNING: COMMAND_FAILED: '/usr/sbin/iptables? > > What?s the rest of the command? Well, there are about 20 of

I should have added the output of pvs: [root ~]# pvs PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree /dev/xvda2 cl_vm731611 lvm2 a-- 9.00g 0 PFree still show 0. It should show 5g. Also: [root ~]# pvdisplay /dev/xvda2 --- Physical volume --- PV Name /dev/xvda2 VG Name cl_vm731611 PV Size 9.00 GiB / not usable 2.00 MiB Allocatable

Hello, I have a CentOS VM with only one disk on a Xenserver. The disk has 2 partitions: /dev/xvda1 -> /boot /dev/xvda2 -> a physical volume for LVM I added 5GB to this disk via Xencenter to extend /dev/xvda2. Usually I just have to do "pvresize /dev/xvda" to have the additional space added to the disk. But for some reason it does not work for this disk. [root ~]# pvresize

Am 09.10.2017 um 17:54 schrieb Jonathan Billings: > I think that the important learning points today are: > > 1.) CentOS7 (and any other distro that uses systemd) will have /run as > a tmpfs filesystem, and /var/run points to /run on CentOS7, so even if > you think this disagrees with the FHS, that's the way it is for > CentOS. And fun fact: not only RHEL 7 and thus CentOS

On a 7.2 desktop system I see irregular attempts to start the fingerprint authentication daemon "fprintd". One of the messages is "D-Bus service launched with name: net.reactivated.Fprint" This fails as there is no fingerprint device. fprintd.service is disabled. Without a fingerprint device, is this software needed. Yum removal (aborted) shows no packages dependent on

Mike McCarthy, W1NR wrote: > Your IP address is flagged as spam in Real Time Block Lists. Are you > using a dynamic IP address? You may have a mis-configured server that is > allowing spammers to relay through your server. Another possibility is > your system is compromised with a spambot. > Why are you top-posting? And another reason it may be blocked is the same reason *I* get

On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 06:05:54PM +0100, Leon Fauster wrote: > > Am 27.01.2017 um 17:27 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: > > > > Johnny Hughes wrote: > >> On 01/27/2017 09:19 AM, Jon LaBadie wrote: > >>> With a large update to be made, eg. the 900 package > >>> one I questioned yesterday, are there any suggestions > >>> to avoid possible

My system is 7.2.1511. When I run "yum update", it wants to install about 900 packages total. Most are labeled just "el7". A few "el7_1" and a lot are "el7_3" or 7.3. None are 7.2. I'm not surprised when I see 50-100 packages needing an update. But 900? And none specific to the installed system? My last update, of 4 packages, was Dec 31, 2016. I

OR just make the file immutable if it's so critical to you. -- Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology! Nux! www.nux.ro ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Jon LaBadie" <jcu at labadie.us> > To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> > Sent: Wednesday, 12 April, 2017 07:16:22 > Subject: Re: [CentOS] Network Manager / CentOS 7 /

On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 10:19:49AM -0400, mark wrote: > Fred Smith wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:28:23AM -0400, mark wrote: > <MVNCH> > > One thing I don't understand is how/why the firewall is DROPping so > > many attempts on port 25 when it in fact has a port forward rule sending > > port 25 on to my mailserver. How does it know, or why does it

Anyone familiar with the selinux policy for the amanda backup software package? I'm getting lots of data not being backed up. For example, under /home there are 2 directory trees owned by root. Those get backed up, user home dirs do not. No AVC denials nor messages in /var/log/messages or journalctl log. But if I turn off selinux enforcing, or set amanda_t type to permissive, complete

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 02:47:47PM -0500, Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, July 11, 2017 2:20 pm, Michael Hennebry wrote: > > I have a hp photosmart C3180 all-in-one and am well and truly sick of it. > > It seems like every time I go on another printing binge, > > I need yet another print cartridge. > > hp-clean doesn't help. > > IIRC this use it or lose

A friend runs 6.8 but would like to add postscreen to his email server. It is provided with postfix version 2.8 and up. The newest postfix for 6.8 is 2.6.x. Any likelyhood it will be further updated? Or is there another source for newer postfix versions for CentOS 6.8? Similar query for the clamav db, now at 0.99.1 with 0.99.2 out for quite some time. Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie

On 2016-10-03, Jon LaBadie <jcu at labadie.us> wrote: > IIRC, for mount.nfs, the "r" option is read only while the "w" > option is read+write. They may be mutually exclusive. I don't believe this is accurate. ro and rw are mutually exclusive, but there is no "w" option. (Which doesn't help the OP, unfortunately, but at least he knows.) For the

On a CentOS 7 system I'm trying to install lightdm. Yum says it requires "glib2(x86-64) >= 2.50.3". glib2 2.46 is installed but I have not found a 2.50 version. Have I overlooked it in some repo? -- Jon H. LaBadie jcu at labadie.us 11226 South Shore Rd. (703) 787-0688 (H) Reston, VA 20190 (703) 935-6720 (C)

I think something along these lines appeared before but I was unable to find them. I'm on a 7.6 system, been running clamav and amavisd-new since 6 days with little problem. On a recent reboot, clamd at amavisd does not start up and fails manual start. The problem seems to be the missing socket that connects the pair, "/var/run/clamd.amavisd/clamd.socket". I believe this should