similar to: Hardware Support of CentOS 6: Mini-PC

Hello Walter, On Sat, 13 May 2017 13:08:17 +0200 "Walter H." <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > On 13.05.2017 00:29, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > > I have been working, for the past few years, with armv7 SOCs and have > a number of servers working. > > > > Intel, etal are catching up with ARM and I have seen ones like: > > > >

I have been working, for the past few years, with armv7 SOCs and have a number of servers working. Intel, etal are catching up with ARM and I have seen ones like: https://www.aliexpress.com/item/NEW-Mini-pc-X86-4-Lan-Qotom-Q190G4N-with-celeron-J1900-quad-core-4-usb-VGA/32785346279.html I am looking for a low power (this is 10W) x86_64 board that has at least 2 core and 2GB memory. A single

On 07/12/2016 03:36 AM, Yamaban wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:15, Walter H. wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this? >> https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano >> >> would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead of >> my router (integratet firewall, NAT) and wlan-ap >>

On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:15, Walter H. wrote: > > Hello, > > can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this? > https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano > > would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead of > my router (integratet firewall, NAT) and wlan-ap > > Thanks, > Walter Well, it's a "Braswell" gen cpu (Intel

On Tue, July 12, 2016 10:36, Yamaban wrote: > On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 10:15, Walter H. wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> can CentOS 6.8 be run on a mini-PC like this? >> https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano >> >> would like to configure this as a Firewall, and this should be instead >> of >> my router (integratet firewall, NAT) and

Hello Walter, On Mon, 15 May 2017 09:22:54 +0200 "Walter H." <walter.h at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > On Sun, May 14, 2017 11:00, wwp wrote: > > On Sat, 13 May 2017 13:08:17 +0200 "Walter H." > > <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > > > >> On 13.05.2017 00:29, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > >> > I have been working,

Thanks, Nux!. But a few hours late. I just purchased: http://www.ebay.com/itm/ZOTAC-ZBOX-NANO-Plus-Mini-PC-ZBOXNANO-AD12-PLUS-2GB-320GB-with-Power-Supply-56/382042194064?_trksid=p2045573.c100033.m2042&_trkparms=aid%3D111001%26algo%3DREC.SEED%26ao%3D1%26asc%3D41376%26meid%3Deae770f22d504a9b8366eb0c02dd20d6%26pid%3D100033%26rk%3D7%26rkt%3D8%26sd%3D152356229748 Zotac has been in the mini/nano

On Sun, May 14, 2017 11:00, wwp wrote: > On Sat, 13 May 2017 13:08:17 +0200 "Walter H." > <Walter.H at mathemainzel.info> wrote: > >> On 13.05.2017 00:29, Robert Moskowitz wrote: >> > I have been working, for the past few years, with armv7 SOCs and have >> > a number of servers working. >> > >> > Intel, etal are catching up with

On 13.05.2017 00:29, Robert Moskowitz wrote: > I have been working, for the past few years, with armv7 SOCs and have > a number of servers working. > > Intel, etal are catching up with ARM and I have seen ones like: > > https://www.aliexpress.com/item/NEW-Mini-pc-X86-4-Lan-Qotom-Q190G4N-with-celeron-J1900-quad-core-4-usb-VGA/32785346279.html > > I would take something

> On 17 July 2018 at 09:24, Jay Hart <jhart at kevla.org> wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> What would the recommended minimum amount of RAM be, to run Centos 7. >> 16GB??? >> > > > Jay, it helps us help you when you give more information. > > I have CentOS 7 running happily on 4GB. My presumption - based on > experience, extrapolation, and google

I'm wondering if I'm seeing a regression of 5616 with 3.4.8. I'm trying to set-up pptpd with winbind, which I'm doing on two machines on Debian lenny, and I'm trying on Debian Squeeze now. The Windows client is saying "Error 778: It was not possible to verify the identity of the server." The logs say that everything is ok, and that the client is hanging up the

Hello I've got this Mini-PC https://www.zotac.com/product/mini_pcs/zbox-ci323-nano everything is fine -> latest 6.8 kernel works; both Ethernet-Interfaces work and also the WLAN-Interface works; the two Ethernet-Interfaces are eth0 and eth1 the WLAN-Interface is wlan0 eth1 is connected on ISP side eth0 is connected on my LAN side to a switch; and wlan0 shall also be on my LAN side f?r

If it had two (or more) network ports, I'd be all over it. A single gigabit nic is a bit limiting for me. On 05/17/2017 01:04 PM, Nux! wrote: > Hi, > > I have this and happy with it, I believe it ticks all your boxes (+ built-in IR port). > > http://www.intel.co.uk/content/www/uk/en/nuc/nuc-kit-dn2820fykh.html > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg

At the moment I've no host with which to test ppp/lp things on. If you (or anyone) could provide complete regexes, (each beginning with ^ and ending with $) I will patch the rules accordingly. If not, sending the full log lines is a good start. Thanks! -- [ Todd J. Troxell ,''`. Student, Debian GNU/Linux Developer, SysAdmin, Geek :

I grabbed a new SSD M4-CT064M4SSD2 from Crucial. I am disappointed. I stuck the unit in an Atom machine (zotac) with CentOS 6 on the disk. It really doesn't "feel" faster than the previous 5400 RPM drive that was in it. The SSD is giving me (in the zotac running centos 6): hdparm -t /dev/sda /dev/sda: Timing buffered disk reads: 298 MB in 3.00 seconds = 99.30 MB/sec The

Good Day. Recently buy an lenovo laptop (110 Ideapad 14IBR). Install (with problems) Centos 7, but when start the first time, get the fail screen. Then, I try to start the x server (startx) get the error: FBIOBLANK invalid argument. This laptop have an Intel HD graphics 400 and a Intel Celeron N3060; googling , I concluded that is a fail in the driver, but don?t know how resolve. Please help

I am use to low random entropy on my arm boards, not an intel. On my Lenovo x120e, cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail reports 3190 bits of entropy. On my armv7 with Centos7 I would get 130 unless I installed rng-tools and then I get ~1300. SSH into one and it drops back to 30! for a few minutes. Sigh. Anyway on my new Zotac nano ad12 with an AMD E-1800 duo core, I am seeing 180.

I'm having a wireless connection issue with an HP laptop and a Zotac media server after the 6.4 package updates from CR repository. Nothing changed with wireless config as far as I can tell. Both have been working fine with previous releases of 6.x. Oddly, if a cat 5 cable is connected for a few seconds and then disconnected the wireless works fine and survives a 'service network

https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75464 Priority: medium Bug ID: 75464 Assignee: nouveau at lists.freedesktop.org Summary: [nv4e] [vdpau] causes hangs QA Contact: xorg-team at lists.x.org Severity: normal Classification: Unclassified OS: All Reporter: ronald645 at gmail.com Hardware:

On 05/26/2017 08:35 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 27.05.2017 um 01:09 schrieb Robert Moskowitz <rgm at htt-consult.com>: >> >> I am use to low random entropy on my arm boards, not an intel. >> >> On my Lenovo x120e, >> >> cat /proc/sys/kernel/random/entropy_avail >> >> reports 3190 bits of entropy. >> >> On my armv7 with