similar to: CentOS-announce Digest, Vol 135, Issue 9

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2016:1086 Moderate Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2016-1086.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 3d5b6fc52faf244fd920acdeefd625109a512221b9244567f9c51a3df5360ca3 libndp-1.2-6.el7_2.i686.rpm

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1090 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1090.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) x86_64: 2264ec3a12a415659e3cb5e27a05f5c85e8fccb0db45896e3cfd8ac77dfe6e85 firefox-45.1.1-1el7.centos.i686.rpm

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Greetings, First start of by working on a physical system, virtual machine, or container that matches the OS Template you are wanting to build. I used my CentOS 7 Public QA OS OpenVZ container to build it. You must of course have a working yum. Once we are beyond Public QA and there is stuff in /etc/yum.repos.d/ this won't be a problem. One thing to note is that the --enablerepo= must

CentOS Errata and Bugfix Advisory 2016:1009 Upstream details at : https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2016-1009.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: ( sha256sum Filename ) i386: 8a1b5a12cc396b85b2bb8022acc81358366d4a24b6d819ad887478f4b3aad972 firefox-45.1.1-1.el5.centos.i386.rpm x86_64:

Hello, I've been trying to install Samba4 for a while now, following the instructions over at: http://linuxdrops.com/install-samba-4-on-centos-rhel-fedora-debian-ubuntu/ However, when I get to the stage where I should be able to join the domain with a Windows machine (7, not XP) I run into networking issues. For one, my network is behind a NAT so I can't just use a public DNS for

I'm running samba 4.1.2 on Linux Mint 15. Getting the following: ? ./samba-tool drs kcc samba-realm Failed to connect host 192.168.231.132 on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED Failed to connect host 192.168.231.132 (samba-realm) on port 135 - NT_STATUS_CONNECTION_REFUSED. I don't see samba or smbd listening on port 135. 53 and 137 are. e.g.: ? netstat -anp | grep samba | grep

These are already open. I'm pretty sure that NT4/2003 PDC's make a DCE/RPC over TCP connection to pull down the <1b> entries from the wins server. I have done packet captures on test NT4 wins server to see how PDC's pull their domain lists, and I see the port 135 three way handshake, which then gets switched over to a tcp port 1028 which is the dce/rpc requests and responses.

I'm getting thease messages in log file: file istream.c: line 135 (i_stream_skip): assertion failed: (stream->v_size == 0 || stream->v_offset + count <= stream->v_size) kernel: pid 23364 (pop3), uid 1042: exited on signal 6 It doesn't happen very often, but I'd like to know what is causing them, any ideas? Should I be worried about it ? System is freebsd, format is mbox

I park a call and instead of the parked extension being returned, I get silence and the log shows a bunch of the following messages WARNING[26220]: codec_gsm.c:135 gsmtolin_framein: Huh? A GSM frame that isn't a multiple of 33 or 65 bytes long from (null) (320)? what does this mean? BTW these messages are intermittant. sometimes it works fine other times i get the above message Regards

There's an excellent tutorial on Cisco's web page at http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk652/tk701/technologies_white_paper09186a00800d6b68.shtml It will tell you just about everything you wanted to know about echo and more :) The short answer to your question, however, is that echo is comprised of two components: volume and delay. Increase either one and the problem gets worse. In the

Just to let people know what's going on: The embargo for XSA-135 lifted today at 1400 UTC. The embargoes for XSAs 134 and 136 lift tomorrow at 1200 UTC. XSA-135 only affects guests which have been assigned a PCNET emulated NIC, which is not the default; as such, it doesn't seem terribly urgent to push the fix today. So rather than push one fix today and another tomorrow, our plan is

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

I have a slight browsing problem. We seem to have multiple domain browse lists that aren't being merged at our wins server. For example, on 2003DOMAIN, I only see 3 domains/workgroups. On NT4DOMAINA, I see 3 domains/workgroups, and on NT4DOMAINB I see 56 domains/workgroups, and on NT4DOMAINC I see 28 domains/workgroups. According to Microsoft documentation the domain master browser of each

On Sun, 04 Dec 2016 08:01:09 -0600 Bob of Donelson Trophy via samba <samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > I have two DC's running Samba 4.5.0 and the "dtdc03" log.samba is > showing the following: > > root at dtdc03:~# tail -f /usr/local/samba/var/log.samba > [2016/12/01 10:14:39.167794, 0] > ../source4/librpc/rpc/dcerpc_sock.c:245(continue_ip_open_socket)

Send CentOS-announce mailing list submissions to centos-announce at centos.org To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit https://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos-announce or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to centos-announce-request at centos.org You can reach the person managing the list at centos-announce-owner at centos.org When

Hello Rowland, >> --- >> # Global parameters >> [global] >> >> username map = /etc/samba/user.map >> > > I am sure this has nothing to do with your problem, but you should > remove the 'username map' line, it has no place on a DC. > ok, did so. >> >> It really does not listen: >> >> root at dc2:~# netstat

Hi all, I have shorewall up and running on my system. (GNU-Linux Mandrake 9) When I tested my firewall at grc.com, Shields-Up informs me that ports 113 and 135 are closed and not ''stealthed'' When reading the faq on the Shorewall site I saw that shorewall rejects rather than denys connection requests on ''TCP ports 113, 135, 137 and 139 as well as UDP ports