similar to: bareos on CentOS 6

Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried >> posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person >> view my post.... >> >> It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for months. Then, about >> a week ago, the server got

On Tue, 17 May 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried > posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person > view my post.... > > It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for months. Then, about a > week ago, the server got a regular yum update, and rebooted... and it's

Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: > W dniu 24.11.2015 o 19:38, m.roth at 5-cent.us pisze: >> Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I >> didn't get much response. > > It's normal for bareos mailing list and bugtrac system. Bareos is paid > support oriented (even opesourced), so don't expect so much help from > them - when they could get

IP wrote: > W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: >> On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >>>> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. >>>> Trouble is, >>>> all I

After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say, arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with kerberos? I see that they have in alpha(?) tls support, which isn't a great idea, given the recent

Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't get much response. I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my path first - I don't just see it with ls. Then, when I do an ls, in

On 07/16/2015 04:25 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been >> looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd >> like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found >> yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back

m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been > looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd > like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found > yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online > storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm

On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, >> all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to >> install on Windoze",

I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm thinking tar, here, as "no games".) Is there

I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to install on Windoze", and how to restore.... First question: how do you *see* a list of the files that have been backed up (you're not going to tell

Il 27/01/19 13:32, Peter Eckel ha scritto: > Hi Alessandro, > >> what type of backup solution do you use on C7? > > the same as on most other operating systems: Bareos. > > <http://www.bareos.org/en/> > > Bareos has some learning curve, but it's free, it's extremely reliable and flexible. I've been using it for years, after switching from its

On Wed, July 15, 2015 7:05 pm, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're > supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows > binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly > of backuppc; comments on that,

W dniu 24.11.2015 o 19:38, m.roth at 5-cent.us pisze: > Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't > get much response. Hi. It's normal for bareos mailing list and bugtrac system. Bareos is paid support oriented (even opesourced), so don't expect so much help from them - when they could get some money for that (paid support). For me it was

On Fri, 26 May 2017, Christian, Mark wrote: > On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 11:19 -0400, Bernard Fay wrote: >> Hi, >> >> Does a fix has already been made in the CenOS RPM repositories for this >> Samba remote execution code vulnerability, CVE-2017-7494? > yes. samba-3.6.23-43.el6_9.x86_64.rpm And samba-*-4.4.4-14.el7_3.x86_64 -- Paul Heinlein <> heinlein at

W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: > On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >>> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. >>> Trouble is, >>> all I keep finding on the Web are "how to

On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:22:29AM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making > it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging > mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say, > arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with > kerberos? I see

I've got a CentOS 6 machine that's slated to go into production providing some web and development-repository services. Part of the environment is gitweb, which works as expected with one glitch: SELinux doesn't allow gitweb.cgi to query sssd to display who owns the repositories. The audit log entries are pretty straightforward, e.g., type=AVC msg=audit(XXXXXXXXXXXX): avc:

> Am 28.01.2019 um 10:50 schrieb Peter Eckel <lists at eckel-edv.de>: > > Hi Alessandro, > >> Why many users skip bacula? It is powerfull and very stable. It is very difficult to setup but if you know how it works it is simple. IMHO - as Kern (Bacula lead developer) is pushing Bacula forward I dont understand this too. It must be a misinformation about the current

On Thu, 23 May 2019, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I might actually be able to have a workable answer: > > alias drf='/usr/bin/df -x tmpfs' /usr/bin/df \ -x autofs -x binfmt_misc -x cgroup -x configfs -x debugfs \ -x devpts -x devtmpfs -x efivarfs -x hugetlbfs -x mqueue \ -x nfsd -x proc -x pstore -x rpc_pipefs -x securityfs \ -x selinuxfs -x sysfs -x tmpfs :-) --