similar to: Official Docker images and security updates

On Fri, 29 Jan 2016 06:31, Keith Keller <kkeller at ...> wrote: > On 2016-01-29, reynierpm at gmail.com <reynierpm at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> I am building a Dockerfile and I am setting up MariaDB repos as follow: > > This question is probably way offtopic for a CentOS mailing list. > >> # Setup MariaDB repos >> RUN touch

Am Donnerstag, 25. Juni 2020, 04:52:37 CEST schrieb Dave Lange: > My dockerfile: > ... > RUN apt update \ > && apt-get install -y --no-install-recommends \ > ca-certificates \ > wget \ > && rm -rf /var/lib/apt/lists/* Any reason why you remove the contents of /var/lib/apt/lists? On my system, this directory holds PGP signed information about each

On 24 June 2020 at 15:15, Dave Lange wrote: | I continue to receive an error installing R via dockerfile on a buster | image python:3. | E: The value 'buster-cran40' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a | release is not available in the sources Do you have the Dockerfile in public repo we can look at? | My starting point is the debian buster based Python:3 image adding a couple

No sure why you?re doubting me but if one would like the minimal Dockerfile following the CRAN recommendations at https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/, one would simply do FROM ubuntu:22.04 USER root ENV DEBIAN_FRONTEND noninteractive ## Configure Ubuntu for R install RUN apt update \ && apt install -y --no-install-recommends \ software-properties-common \ gnupg2 \

I want to build a couple of containers by function instead of replicating even slim images for every single package. My current base image provides an updated debian and python3 image. Dave Lange Kenmore, WA On Wed, Jun 24, 2020 at 3:18 PM Sean Southard <sean.m.southard at gmail.com> wrote: > Dave is there a specific reason you want to install both in one container? > > It is

My dockerfile: FROM python:3 WORKDIR /usr/src/app COPY requirements.txt ./ COPY languageserver-master ./ COPY radian-master ./ RUN pip3 install --no-cache-dir -r requirements.txt EXPOSE 8080 RUN apt-key adv --keyserver keys.gnupg.net --recv-key 'E19F5F87128899B192B1A2C2AD5F960A256A04AF' RUN echo "deb http://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/debian buster-cran40/" >>

I continue to receive an error installing R via dockerfile on a buster image python:3. E: The value 'buster-cran40' is invalid for APT::Default-Release as such a release is not available in the sources My starting point is the debian buster based Python:3 image adding a couple of python specific configurations and then using the commands in the R project documentation for installing R on

I have to support a legacy build that runs on CentOS 6. I?m new to Docker and would like to use the official CentOS 6.10 image (https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/blob/da050e2fc6c28d8d72d8bf78c49537247b5ddf76/docker/Dockerfile <https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/blob/da050e2fc6c28d8d72d8bf78c49537247b5ddf76/docker/Dockerfile>) as a Docker container on

On 8 July 2024 at 19:32, marcoblanchette at icloud.com wrote: | Oh, again, sorry for the spam but the problem Lauren is seeing is when she is | trying to sign the key. Installing gnugpg usually takes care of that problem. I am not sure about that. For jammy, my current (and used) rocker/r2u:jammy Dockerfile is https://github.com/rocker-org/r2u/blob/master/jammy/Dockerfile and it does what

Hi Dirk and Marco, I need to test some of the suggested solutions and circle back here. Thank you so much for your help. Br, Lauren -- Lauren J. Gerber Bioinformatician Precision Systems Medicine (Kallioniemi) Research Group iCAN ? Digital Precision Cancer Medicine Flagship Institute for Molecular Medicine Finland (FIMM) Nordic EMBL Partnership for Molecular Medicine Biomedicum Helsinki 2U,

Oh, again, sorry for the spam but the problem Lauren is seeing is when she is trying to sign the key. Installing gnugpg usually takes care of that problem. From: marcoblanchette at icloud.com <marcoblanchette at icloud.com> Date: Monday, July 8, 2024 at 12:26?PM To: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd at debian.org> Cc: Gerber, Lauren J <lauren.gerber at helsinki.fi>, r-sig-debian at

Lauren, I am now back home where looking into these things is a little easier. From your first email to me, I started off with the selenium container you mentioned as your starting point. And that basically is your issue. It is a 'high-level' container, and it sets a user. (Essentially) all other Dockerfiles you have seen and been pointed at are 'lower-level' and operate as root

Lauren, little oversight from my Dockerfile, if you want to follow the CRAN steps and get the R from the cloud.r-project.org server, you want to replace && add-apt-repository -y "ppa:marutter/rrutter4.0" With && add-apt-repository "deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu $(lsb_release -cs)-cran40/" The ppa repo is Michael Rutter personal repo

On Wed, 4 Mar 2020 16:56:02 -0500 Alfred von Campe <alfred at von-campe.com> wrote: > I have to support a legacy build that runs on CentOS 6. I?m new to > Docker and would like to use the official CentOS 6.10 image > (https://github.com/CentOS/sig-cloud-instance-images/blob/da050e2fc6c28d8d72d8bf78c49537247b5ddf76/docker/Dockerfile >

On 09/03/2018 11:05 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: > Am 03.09.18 um 15:12 schrieb Robert Marcano via samba: >> On 09/03/2018 04:10 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >>> >>> As I am learning docker lately I came to the idea of using a docker >>> container as a "fallback" DC at sites where there is no budget (or >>>

Am 03.09.18 um 17:21 schrieb Robert Marcano: > On 09/03/2018 11:05 AM, Stefan G. Weichinger via samba wrote: >> great, thanks! Which docker image do you use as base image? > > Sent to you a copy of this email with an attachment of the Dockerfile > needed to build the container image. There are two Dockerfile there, one > for Fedora (extremely experimental Samba package there,

And sorry for the spam, but I meant to say that the Dockerfile is basically following the steps from https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu/ as Lauren was trying to do but start by installing the pre-requisites needed to deploy the r-base package on a Ubuntu 22.04 Docker image (which is NOT a base 22.04 but a minimally striped version of 22.04). From: marcoblanchette at icloud.com

Hi Dirk, Thank you so much for looking into this when you got home. I greatly appreciate it. I was actually in the midst of writing to everyone the following message: ?. ?. ?. Hi All, I have some good news. ? My docker image is now up-to-date with R version 4.4.1. I first had to clear a bunch of unused data using docker system prune ?force. Apparently, it cleared over 32.53 gigs of data, and

Yes, keep the $(lsb-release -cs) there. This allows you to change the version of the OS without having to change anything else (for instance we are migrating all of our docker to 24.04 LTS right now, so we only have to modify the FROM entry and all of our Dockerfile will still work). From: Gerber, Lauren J <lauren.gerber at helsinki.fi> Date: Thursday, July 11, 2024 at 2:21?AM To:

Hi Marco, Thank you for the follow up email. In the line below, do I replace $(lsb-release -cs) with jammy (Ubuntu 22.04) or leave it alone: Add-apt-repository ?deb https://cloud.r-project.org/bin/linux/ubuntu jammy-cran40/? It?s good to know about installations for Bioconductor. I am not currently using it, but I may need it in the future for other projects. Br, Lauren -- Lauren J. Gerber