similar to: E-mail advice sought

I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline JavaScript in a few places so CSP breaks it) but - Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? I know there are some wacky characters that are legal in e-mail addresses but are

On Sat, April 30, 2016 1:28 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. > > I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working > on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline > JavaScript in a few places so CSP breaks it) but - Alice, you may be a lifesaver! Are you considering to also take a

Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: > On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>> >>> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >>> >>> But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why

On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: >>> On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder >>>> <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > > For e-mail sent to people, yes. > > But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why > blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a username is a standards > problem. That's not how the RFC rules are defined. But, rather than argue that point at

On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: >> On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >>>> >>>> But for what

On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> >> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >> >> But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why >> blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a username is a standards >> problem. > >

On 04/30/2016 11:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? ... > I don't think a whitelist alphabet is best approach because of people > with names that are not spelled with Latin characters. > > Is there an existing blacklist of characters that technically legal > but are generally avoided in e-mail addresses? The RFC uses a

On 04/30/2016 12:22 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 04/30/2016 11:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? > ... >> I don't think a whitelist alphabet is best approach because of people >> with names that are not spelled with Latin characters. >> >> Is there an existing blacklist of characters that technically

On 01/05/16 13:23, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >> I think this is my autism coming in to play, I think what is very clear >> to me I just am not able to adequately communicate because clearly >> people are not even remotely grasping what I am trying to convey. >> > > Basically whether it is a white list or a black list

Folks I have a new laptop running Centos 6.2 64-bit. I'd like to put a virtual machine running Windows 7 (licensed), with full audio/video functions, and good response. Which virtual system would you recommend? I can think of KVM, or VirtualBox, or ...? The "good response" requirement pretty much excludes a web-style video presentation. Opinions solicited. David Kurn

Hi all, one of our clients have three branch offices currently connected by ADSL lines. they are using Cisco 827-4V units with the FXS ports connected to their aging PBX units. I am thinking of installing an * server in the head office, maybe with an analogue FXO card connected to the PSTN so field officers in Melbourne can call sydney for a local call price. The question is - what Digium

I have a remote home server updated to CentOS-7.2.1511 (as stated in /etc/redhat-release) but I have not re-booted since the update. The machine is currently running kernel 3.10.0-229.11.1.el7.x86_64. I'm wondering if anyone has advice on any safety steps I can take before re-booting, so that in the event of failure I can give simple instructions to my daughter at the other end on how to get

I'd like to hear the thoughts of list members on which type of storage method seems "best" for inboxes and for folders. The filesystem is GFS2 and for various reasons I can't change it. Inboxes - currently Mbox format. Some users have upwards of 5000 messages in there (the largest is about 18k entries) and thanks to attachments some inboxes are 40-200Mb with a few sitting at

From R 2.9.0 we have the concept of versions for Rd files. The manual is clear about the differences but I am unsure as to what I should do about my existing packages. Is it recommended that I set the version to 1.1 and then fix the errors R CMD check helpfully points out and then subsequently do the same for later versions (the manual mentions version 2 is coming)? What benefit will I gain?

JohnG <mcsjgs@cox.net> wrote: > I run OS X 10.3.7 on a PowerMac MDD G4 on a cable broadband connection. > I have reason to think my system has been tampered with. Security > features in Mac OS X have been left unlocked (Preference Pane - Users) OSX is substantially different from FreeBSD (even without netinfo) despite having some of the same source code. I doubt you'll find

I run OS X 10.3.7 on a PowerMac MDD G4 on a cable broadband connection. I have reason to think my system has been tampered with. Security features in Mac OS X have been left unlocked (Preference Pane - Users) even though a master lock has always been set in the Security Preference Pane. This locks all other important preference panes which could be tampered with. Also permissions have been

I''ve got a really strange problem using belongs_to. I apologize in advance for the length... this is going to take a while to explain. Basic idea: Creating a User requires that the user enter an email address and activation key that matches an existing PendingUser. After creating the user successfully, that pending user should be marked as "used". The problem: When I

Hello, I just migrated a few dovecot IMAP mailbox (Maildir format) from a Dovecot 2.1.7 (Debian 7) mailbox server to a Dovecot 2.3.4 (Debian 10) mailbox server and one particular mailbox does not work properly and generates the following error log entries: Jan 21 09:39:21 Panic: imap(EMAIL_ADDRESS)<7741><UTsrWKKcasoAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAB>: file array.c: line 10

Hello, Are there any chances that I could fix this issue by running a "doveadm force-rsync" (https://wiki2.dovecot.org/Tools/Doveadm/ForceResync) on this problematic mailbox? Best regards, Mabi ??????? Original Message ??????? On Tuesday, January 21, 2020 9:53 AM, mabi <mabi at protonmail.ch> wrote: > Hello, > > I just migrated a few dovecot IMAP mailbox (Maildir