Displaying 20 results from an estimated 6000 matches similar to: "Storage cluster advise, anybody?"
2016 Apr 22
1
Storage cluster advise, anybody?
Hi Valeri
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 10:24 PM, Digimer <lists at alteeve.ca> wrote:
> On 22/04/16 03:18 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> Dear Experts,
>>
>> I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a storage
>> cluster, or as a distributed filesystem.
>>
>> I made my own research of what I can do, but I hit a snag with my
>>
2016 Apr 22
0
Storage cluster advise, anybody?
On 22/04/16 03:18 PM, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> Dear Experts,
>
> I would like to ask everybody: what would you advise to use as a storage
> cluster, or as a distributed filesystem.
>
> I made my own research of what I can do, but I hit a snag with my
> seemingly best choice, so I decided to stay away from it finally, and ask
> clever people what they would use.
>
>
2016 Apr 22
1
Storage cluster advise, anybody?
On Fri, 22 Apr 2016, Digimer wrote:
> Then you would use pacemaker to manage the floating IP, fence
> (stonith) a lost node, and promote drbd->mount FS->start nfsd->start
> floating IP.
My favorite acronym: stonith -- shoot the other node in the head.
--
Paul Heinlein
heinlein at madboa.com
45?38' N, 122?6' W
2016 Jul 05
2
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On 05/07/16 20:49, Alex Crow wrote:
> FYI, by "it did, completely" I meant it failed completely.
>
> Even if the only file we have to have on the cluster FS (which now
> seems to be down solely to the ctdb lock file), I'm still worried what
> these failures mean:
>
> 1) does the -rw (without -m) test suggest any problems with the
> MooseFS FS I'm
2016 Jul 05
3
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On 05/07/16 21:16, Alex Crow wrote:
>
>
> On 05/07/16 21:00, Rowland penny wrote:
>> On 05/07/16 20:49, Alex Crow wrote:
>>> FYI, by "it did, completely" I meant it failed completely.
>>>
>>> Even if the only file we have to have on the cluster FS (which now
>>> seems to be down solely to the ctdb lock file), I'm still worried
2016 Jul 05
4
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On 05/07/16 19:45, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
>> I've set up the "DR" side of my cluster to "use mmap = no" and with
>> "private dir" removed from the smb.conf.
> Why do you set "use mmap = no"?
>
>> I have the MooseFS guys on the case as well. Should I put them in touch
2010 Jun 16
6
clustered file system of choice
Hi all,
I am just trying to consider my options for storing a large mass of
data (tens of terrabytes of files) and one idea is to build a
clustered FS of some kind. Has anybody had any experience with that?
Any recommendations?
Thanks in advance for any and all advice.
Boris.
2010 Jun 11
2
MooseFS repository
Hi,
A repository for MooseFS is just born. It provides CentOS 5.5 SRPMS,
i386 and x86_64.
cd /etc/yum.repos.d/; wget http://centos.kodros.fr/moosefs.repo ; yum
install mfs
Two points:
- DNS may not be up to date where you are. The subdomain has just been
created. Please be patient.
- I have made an update to the .spec file, to move config files to
/etc/mfs instead of /etc. I had no time to test
2016 Jul 03
4
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On 03/07/16 13:06, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 01, 2016 at 10:00:21AM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
>> We've had a strange issue after following the recommendations at
>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ping_pong, particularly the part
>> about mmap coherence. We are running CTDB/Samba over a MooseFS
>> clustered FS, and we'd not done the ping-pong before.
2016 Jul 05
2
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
Hi Volker,
I apologise if I came across as an a***hole here. Responses below:
On 05/07/16 20:45, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 08:12:59PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
>>
>> On 05/07/16 19:45, Volker Lendecke wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 07:21:16PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
>>>> I've set up the "DR" side of my cluster to
2016 Jul 13
2
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On Tue, Jul 05, 2016 at 10:12:31PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
> I did not "put it" like anything. I just saw an problem in my setup,
> read some documents on the samba wiki, followed some advice and saw some
> unexpected behaviour. Perhaps I imagined the wiki to be more moderated
> that it really is, so my trust was misplaced. I don't blame anyone, all
> I'm trying to
2016 Jul 14
2
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 02:39:48PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
> >The main hint I would like to give to the MooseFS developers is to get
> >ping_pong -rw working. If you need any assistance in setting that up
> >and getting arguments on why this is important, let us know!
> >
> >With best regards,
> >
> >Volker
>
> Any arguments that I can pass on would
2011 Jul 05
2
Many "Error: Corrupted index cache file /XXX/dovecot.index.cache: invalid record size"
Hi all,
I just joigned this list, so I'm sorry if this problem has already been
reported.
I'm running Dovecot 2.0.13 on many servers, one for POP/IMAP access,
others for LDA, others for authentification only, etc.
All servers are accessing a shared file system, based on MooseFS
(www.moosefs.org). The FS is mounted using FUSE.
All my Dovecot servers have this configuration :
2016 Jul 14
2
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 02:22:12PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
> At the moment we're pretty happy with the Samba side of things. I
> did wonder if there was any help that you kind chaps might be able
> to give to the MooseFS guys if they need it (they've not asked yet
> but I've suggested they might be able to). Overall it's working
The main hint I would like to give to
2016 Jul 05
2
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
On 04/07/16 20:39, Volker Lendecke wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 04, 2016 at 04:58:35PM +0100, Alex Crow wrote:
>> • Add the following lines to the [global] section of your Samba
>> configuration
>> clustering = yes
>> idmap backend = tdb2
>> private dir = /gluster/lock
>>
>> Can you confirm that "private dir" does *not* have to be set in smb.conf to
2012 Jun 27
1
XFS-in-a-file
Hello listmates,
Has anybody attempted to run an XFS in a file mounted via -o loop? The file
size is about 20 TB and it resides in a larger XFS filesystem residing on a
disk. That filesystem's size is about 25 TB. What sort of degradation
should one expect under that sort of scenario?
The reason I am asking is that I am trying to run a MooseFS chunkserver in
that filesystem-in-a-file and
2012 May 11
4
index IO patterns
Hey all, we're in the process of checking out alternatives to our index storage. We're currently storing indexes on a NetApp Metrocluster which works fine, but is very expensive. We're planning a few different setups and doing some actual performance tests on them.
Does anyone know some of the IO patterns of the indexes? For instance:
- mostly random reads or linear reads/writes?
2010 Jul 16
4
Installping puppet with kickstart -- Cannot find local fact /proc/cpuinfo
Hi
I have been trying to get puppet working with kickstart. I am
trying to install Hadoop on the nodes. Installing puppet from
kickstart work and when the machine restarts, certificates are pulled
down and hadoop user is created and files are extracted.
I want all the user creation etc to be done before the machine
reboots so that I can set up init.d scripts to do a start of hadoop .
So I
2011 Nov 23
1
Corosync init-script broken on CentOS6
Hello all,
I am trying to create a corosync/pacemaker cluster using CentOS 6.0.
However, I'm having a great deal of difficulty doing so.
Corosync has a valid configuration file and an authkey has been generated.
When I run /etc/init.d/corosync I see that only corosync is started.
>From experience working with corosync/pacemaker before, I know that
this is not enough to have a functioning
2016 Jul 01
4
Winbind process stuck at 100% after changing use_mmap to no
Hi,
We've had a strange issue after following the recommendations at
https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Ping_pong, particularly the part about
mmap coherence. We are running CTDB/Samba over a MooseFS clustered FS,
and we'd not done the ping-pong before. After finding that the mmap
coherence test did not pass, we changed "use mmap" to "no" in smb.conf.
This morning