similar to: Postgrey on CentOS 6

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 1000 matches similar to: "Postgrey on CentOS 6"

2016 Apr 22
2
output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6)
On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:23:28 +1200 Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: > On 23/04/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > > for this CentOS release as I have seen now: > >
2016 Apr 22
0
Postgrey on CentOS 6
On 23/04/16 02:13, Gabriele Pohl wrote: > I administer a postfix mail server on CentOS 6. > Now I want to setup another with similar configuration. > > But the postgrey package is no longer available in Epel > for this CentOS release as I have seen now: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/postgrey/ > > 1. Will I have to make an upgrade of the existing
2016 Apr 22
0
output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6)
> -----Original Message----- > From: centos-bounces at centos.org [mailto:centos-bounces at centos.org] On > Behalf Of Gabriele Pohl > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 11:53 AM > To: centos at centos.org > Subject: [CentOS] output of "ls" (was: Re: Postgrey on CentOS 6) > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2016 02:23:28 +1200 > Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >
2019 Jun 19
4
Postgrey not working
Hi, I have a working installation of Postfix and Dovecot that works nicely. I've added SpamAssassin, which does a good job of flagging spam. Now I wanted to add greylisting to my server. Here's what I did. $ sudo yum install postgrey Increase the greylisting delay. # /etc/sysconfig/postgrey POSTGREY_OPTS="--delay=300" Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf accordingly.
2020 Jun 11
2
SV: handling spam from gmail.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 05:02:03PM +0800, Plutocrat wrote: > On 11/06/2020 16.26, Marc Roos wrote: > > I know it is not dovecot who should fix this. But anyone using dovecot > > is using an MTA, and receiving spam ;) I know how to look at email > > headers. Spf and dkim is not solving anything here. > > You can configure this sort of thing in postfix, exim etc. The
2007 Dec 18
5
Short postgrey guide?
Hi Guys, Are you interested in a brief guide on how to set up postgrey (anti-spam greylisting) with postfix? I set it up today and it took me a while to get it working as the config is slightly different from that on many of the googled guides (many are debian/ubuntu based). The darn config file lives in /etc/sysconfig on RH/CentOS rather than /etc/default as mentioned in all the guides I
2012 Mar 25
1
postgrey, postfix, tld list
Hello all, I am looking for the correct way to add postgrey to my system but whitelist everything except for com, org, and net domains. Most of my spam is from .info domains. There seems to be no way to only go after certain domains, instead postgrey wants to go after everything except what you whitelist. So my idea was to whitelist .com, .net, .org, .gov, and a few others while greylisting
2016 Aug 12
6
postscreen and clamav on CentOS 6.8
A friend runs 6.8 but would like to add postscreen to his email server. It is provided with postfix version 2.8 and up. The newest postfix for 6.8 is 2.6.x. Any likelyhood it will be further updated? Or is there another source for newer postfix versions for CentOS 6.8? Similar query for the clamav db, now at 0.99.1 with 0.99.2 out for quite some time. Jon -- Jon H. LaBadie
2019 Jun 17
1
Postfix and choice of RBL
Am 17.06.2019 um 18:09 schrieb Mike Burger: > On 2019-06-17 06:20, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm managing several mail servers running CentOS 7, Postfix and Dovecot. >> SpamAssassin is filtering mail nicely, but I'm considering using RBL >> (blacklists) to take some load off the servers. >> >> General question to those of you who use
2006 Apr 10
2
Postgrey and Centos 4.2
Hi, We have implemented postgrey (postgrey-1.24, compiled from source package) on a centos 4.3 server. It works except for the whitelistings, in file postgrey_whitelist_clients, no matter what domain we enter, their incoming mails gets greylisted. I have posted this question to postgrey list but have not received anything yet. I works OK on a centos 4.1 server. Has anyone experienced similar
2008 Nov 21
1
Postgrey Wiki page - FAO Karanbir
Hi Karanbir, everyone I've only just noticed that the sections on Reporting, Multiple MX Considerations and Whitelisting on the Postgrey page are specific to postfix/postgrey. I remember we previously talked about making that page less specific to any particular MTA, and Steve has since kindly contributed a section for sendmail. So I'm wondering how we could best restructure the page
2005 Mar 22
3
Bug#300888: logcheck-database: database skip postgrey ignore pattern
Package: logcheck-database Version: 1.2.35 Severity: minor logcheck-database contain postgrey ignore file, but postgrey first attempt is listed in logcheck report $ dpkg -l postgrey ii postgrey 1.18-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 3.1 APT prefers unstable APT policy: (500, 'unstable') Architecture: i386 (i686) Kernel: Linux 2.4.29-C3EZRA Locale: LANG=it_IT,
2019 Jun 20
3
Postgrey not working
Le 19/06/2019 ? 22:05, Phil Perry a ?crit?: > Try following the Postgrey guide on the Wiki: > > https://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/postgrey#head-314ceecc5ece27e0f0a4bf1abcd8ee9356cd1a5e > > > Works for me (allowing for the switch to systemd) I've followed this document, and still no joy. Niki -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730
2008 Oct 05
2
problem talking to server postgrey/socket: Permission denied
Hi folks, I have installed postgrey from the rpmforge repo, but it does not work well with postfix from CentOS 5.2: I always get the error: warning: connect to postgrey/socket: Permission denied problem talking to server postgrey/socket: Permission denied But the permissions on the socket seem okay (postfix could write to it): srw-rw-rw- 1 postgrey postgrey 0 4. Okt 14:48 socket I
2019 Jun 20
2
Postgrey not working
Le 20/06/2019 ? 11:28, Alexander Dalloz a ?crit?: > What is being logged when a message passes your MTA inbound? The answer > to your issue is within the maillog. According to maillog, the message is delivered instantly, exactly like on a normal configuration without Postgrey. -- Microlinux - Solutions informatiques durables 7, place de l'?glise - 30730 Montpezat Site :
2019 Jun 19
0
Postgrey not working
On 2019-06-19 04:01, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have a working installation of Postfix and Dovecot that works nicely. > I've added SpamAssassin, which does a good job of flagging spam. Now I > wanted to add greylisting to my server. > > Here's what I did. > > $ sudo yum install postgrey > > Increase the greylisting delay. > > #
2019 Jun 19
0
Postgrey not working
On 19/06/2019 09:01, Nicolas Kovacs wrote: > Hi, > > I have a working installation of Postfix and Dovecot that works nicely. > I've added SpamAssassin, which does a good job of flagging spam. Now I > wanted to add greylisting to my server. > > Here's what I did. > > $ sudo yum install postgrey > > Increase the greylisting delay. > > #
2006 Jul 20
1
How to install Postgrey
hi guys, I tried installing postgrey but im having some troubles. #yum install postgrey Setting up Install Process Setting up repositories Reading repository metadata in from local files Reducing Dag-RHEL-Yum to included packages only Finished Parsing package install arguments No Match for argument: postgrey Nothing to do Anyone tried this one ? tnx --------------------------------- Do
2004 Dec 30
3
Problems migrating from WBEL
Hi folks: I've recently migrated one of my production servers (bad Jason!) from WBEL to CentOS 3.3 using Donavan's instructions in the FAQ (http://www.centos.org/modules/smartfaq/faq.php?faqid=19). While it was as painless as the document suggests, I've run into problems with postgrey (a postfix greylisting daemon) on my server. Whenever I try to start postgrey, I get the
2016 Jul 26
3
Does e2fsck.conf contain "broken_system_clock = 1" per default on CentOS7?
Hi, on all of my CentOS7 VMs on different hypervisors the config file e2fsck.conf contains the line broken_system_clock = 1 I found this because on all of them, the root partition was not checked triggered by interval setting with tune2fs. Do you see similiar /default/ settings on your machines? Is it an issue only on VMs? I have no CentOS7 host on bare metal to compare. Thanks and cheers,