similar to: [OT] disk utility showing message "the partition is misaligned by"

On 04/22/16 08:19, Leon Fauster wrote: <<>> > check it with: > > blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sd > > (if a '0' is returned, the partition is aligned) > ===> Leon, thank you for reply. ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc1 0 ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc2 0 ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc5 2560 ]$ sudo blockdev --report /dev/sdc1 RO

Am 22.04.2016 um 12:40 schrieb g <geleem at bellsouth.net>: > greetings. > > centos 6.7 [current] > > > 'disk utility' has started showing message; > > WARNING: The partition is misaligned by 2560 bytes. This may > result in very poor performance. Repartitioning is suggested. > > for sdc5 - /home partition. > > /dev/sdc5 302243312

On 04/22/2016 09:43 AM, g wrote: > ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc1 > 0 > ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc2 > 0 > ]$ sudo blockdev --getalignoff /dev/sdc5 > 2560 > ]$ sudo blockdev --report /dev/sdc1 > RO RA SSZ BSZ StartSec Size Device > rw 256 512 4096 2048 838860800 /dev/sdc1 > ]$ sudo blockdev --report

Jan, since i can not cc you mail address when filing a bug on oss bugzilla,just paste the bug description here. Testing env, Kernel version:latest linus's mainline 2.6.27 Testing Nodes:test5/6 Description: Jan,i used your provided quota tools,now it works for me:),currently,i'm doing a sanity check for the quota on ocfs2. Found a strange thing when comparing with the ext3,the quota

Back story: I started my pool with a 200gb partition at the end of my drive (sdc5) , until I was able to clear out the data at the beginning of my drive. When I was ready, I ran `btrfs dev add /dev/sdc4 /` then `btrfs dev del /dev/sdc5 /`, $ sudo btrfs fi resize max / Resize ''/'' of ''max'' ERROR: unable to resize ''/'' - Invalid argument in

I shot myself in the foot today. I had a centos 5.11 install running fine. Doing a backup, I overwrote the /bin directory by mistake. I couldn't get my machine to recognize a centos 6.5 or 6.6 install dvd, so I put in the original centos 5.10 install disc and re-installed. No problem. During the text installer, I told it to install grub on /dev/sdc1, which is /boot. My raid arrays with lots

Hi. I have a volume group (let's say) vg_data. It consists from /dev/sdd5 sdd6 sdd7 I added sdc5 Now I want to remove (free) sdd7 and you is to for RAID partition. What are the commands (ordered) I need to perform? I failed to find clear howto. vg-data has only one partition, total size is over 1TB, free space is about 500GB so

Hi. Which is the preferable method for booting multiple logical partions via syslinux ? 1. Create seperate logical (fat 32) partitons for 'each' Live CD, extracted and prepared identically via syslinux/syslinux.cfg (sdc5, sdc6,sdc7 etc.) 2. Use Grub2 to attempt to boot seperate logical partitions with the same extracted Live CD plan as above. 3. Use the chain.c32 module that

Hi I have a degraded array /dev/md2 ===================================================================== $ mdadm -D /dev/md2 /dev/md2: Version : 00.90.01 Creation Time : Thu Oct 6 20:31:57 2005 Raid Level : raid5 Array Size : 221953536 (211.67 GiB 227.28 GB) Device Size : 110976768 (105.84 GiB 113.64 GB) Raid Devices : 3 Total Devices : 2 Preferred Minor : 2

I have a system running CentOS 6.3, with a SCSI attached RAID: http://www.raidweb.com/index.php/2012-10-24-12-40-09/janus-ii-scsi/2012-10-24-12-40-59.html For disaster recovery purposes, I want to build up a spare system which could take the place of the server hosting the RAID above. But here's what I see: # fdisk -l /dev/sdc WARNING: GPT (GUID Partition Table) detected on

I''m getting a VFS kernel panic when trying to booting to FC3 from Xen. Its the one that says I must supply a valid "root=" option. (sorry I don''t have it verbatim.) I''m using the xen-2.0 binary installer, kernel 2.6.9. I am using ext3fs, but I am fairly certain that I have compiled support into the kernel. (I''ve tired compile xen from the 2.0

Thomas Schmitt wrote: > Since we know that the isolinux.bin binary is well ok on other partitions, > i'd say that the MBR code does not load the right blocks from disk when > it wants to get isolinux.bin. Yes, these are my thoughts as well. I think the jump from GRUB to the isohybrid code on the logical partition is working fine, but when the isohybrid code is trying to jump to

Hi, Duncan Elliot wrote: > What is the thought process of clearing the ISO MBR? It is not necessary in the partok case, because the partition to which you copy the image encloses the ISO, exposes it for mounting, and protects it from partition editors. (Another idea from assembler riddling turned out to be a red herring.) Without understanding the language or the BIOS habits of MBR

I don't think this made it to the list yesterday. At least I never saw it show up. -chuck -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: install problem Date: Wed, 08 Apr 2015 19:50:20 -0500 From: Chuck Campbell <campbell at accelinc.com> Reply-To: campbell at accelinc.com Organization: ACCEL Services, Inc. To: CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> CC: campbell at

I have inherited a system set up with multipath, which is not something I have seen before so I could use some advice The system is a Dell R420 with 2 LSI SAS2008 HBAs, 4 internal disks, and a MD3200 storage array attached via SAS cables. Oh and CentOS 6 lsblk shows the following: NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sdd 8:48 0 931.5G 0 disk ??sdd1

Hello, I can''t load the network in unprivileged domain with xen-unstable (Changset 8612). Xen boots fine and domain0 is OK. When I start a new domain I have the following report when booting: ----------------B<----------------------------- * Not running depmod because /lib/modules/2.6.12.6-xenU/ is not writeable. Loading modules... All modules loaded. FATAL: Could not load

Hi, Duncan Elliot wrote: > As far as I can see, this essentially trims off the first 3 bytes of the > custom isohybrid MBR image before applying it to the ISO. You probably mean this line: memcpy(mbr, &isohdpfx[hd0 + 3 * partok], MBRSIZE); The indize do not apply to bytes but to byte arrays of size MBRSIZE. extern unsigned char isohdpfx[][MBRSIZE]; (hd0 + 3 * partok)

On Sat, Aug 1, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Robert Nichols <rnicholsNOSPAM at comcast.net> wrote: > On 08/01/2015 12:05 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: >> >> parted fs resize is deprecated. >> http://savannah.gnu.org/forum/forum.php?forum_id=6837 >> parted fs move can only move a partition into free space >> https://www.gnu.org/software/parted/manual/html_node/move.html >>

David Christensen wrote: > This is how I prepared an ADATA USB Flash Drive 4 GB: ... install-mbr /dev/sdb ... [Rest of very clear description snipped.] What's that? That desn't exist in the Debian I'm running. Otherwise you gave a very good description of what you're doing. >From another message: > Please provide a URL for documentation that explains how to build a >

Hi, I am having problems with cdrecord. Here is my information from scanbus: [root at Eurisko3 ~]# cdrecord -scanbus Cdrecord-Clone 2.01-dvd (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Copyright (C) 1995-2004 J?rg Schilli ng Note: This version is an unofficial (modified) version with DVD support Note: and therefore may have bugs that are not present in the original. Note: Please send bug reports or support requests