similar to: What's the difference between nmcli fields ipv4.addresses and IP4.ADDRESS?

On 07/07/16 05:36 PM, Digimer wrote: > On 07/07/16 05:21 PM, Joe Smithian wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. >> Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red >> Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as >> expected. >> When I restart

Hi All, I see an unexpected beahviour from NetworkManager on CentOS 7.1. Using nmcli tool, I create a bond with two slaves as explained in the Red Hat 7.1 Networking guide. I enable slaves and master; bond works as expected. When I restart NetworkManager, it creates a new bond with the same name but not connected to any device. Two bonds with the same name is confusing for my other monitoring

How to configure DNS server and search domain common for all network interfaces not per device? The only reliable way I found we can set DNS name server and search domain in CentOS 7 is using nmcli which adds DNS name server and search domain to *a specific interface*, e.g. nmcli con mod eth0 +ipv4.dns [IP_ADDRESS]. But I want to set them for all interfaces weather they are configure and

Hi all, I've recently started using NetworkManger service and nmcli tool, I like it much better than the old network service and manually modifying network scripts. I've seen many online questions on how to disable NetworkManger but I have the opposite question! I am wondering if it be OK to disable network service altogether and just use NetworkManger for configuring and managing Ethernet

On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 15:34:43 +0100, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge at gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, 16 Jan 2020 at 07:58, Asle Ommundsen <aommundsen at gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Tonight I upgraded two CentOS 8 boxes to CentOS 8.1 (1911). Then after a >> reboot of the first server the network was unavailable. In IPMI console >>

This is happening with the Centos7-armv7 image 1804, but I was wondering if it is a broader C7 issue. My image has only 2 ifcfg files:? ifcfg-l0 and -link.? 'ip a' is listing the ethernet as eth0.? ifcfg-link has contains: DEVICE=link BOOTPROTO=dhcp ONBOOT=on I then used nmcli to create my ifcfg-eth0 nmcli con delete eth0 nmcli con add type ethernet con-name eth0 ifname eth0 ip4

Dear List I fear I stumbled over a bug in asterisk 13.14.1. My 'phones' are roaming around, sometimes some are connecting from ipv6 enabled networks, another time they are not. If a connection is ipv6 I would prefer to use ipv6 to avoid ipv4-nat problems. I have not specified a transport in the endpoint section, so that the appropriate transport which corresponds to the registration

Dear Mark, thanks for the additional hints. On 22/09/2020 17:26, Mark Milhollan wrote: > On Tue, 22 Sep 2020, Felix K?lzow wrote: > >> A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which >> causes several issues in our setup. > >> # nmcli con show >> NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE >> eno4?????

I see my problem.? I mis-read what nmcli con mod eth0 mac "02:67:15:00:81:0B" does.? It sets HWADDR; which interface to link to, not MACADDR, what MAC address you want for your interface. So I have read the nmcli pages and googled a bit.? I cannot find a way to set MACADDR.? I suppose I can set HWADDR then use sed to change it to MACADDR, but this seems a real hack. ARM boards do

Hi, I haven't been to find this (NetworkManager) change documented. On: CentOS Linux release 7.1.1503 (Core) $ /bin/nmcli con NAME UUID TYPE DEVICE ens32 7629e52d-bd42-4cd5-a424-8c58e7e0bf37 802-3-ethernet ens32 On: CentOS Linux release 7.2.1511 (Core) $ /bin/nmcli con NAME UUID TYPE

Dear Simon, every second IP-address is unwanted. We restarted? eno4: nmcli con down eno4; nmcli con up eno4 and the second address vanishes. Then after a few ours, the second ip address reappears. This is the config-file of eno2: # cat ifcfg-eno2 TYPE=Ethernet PROXY_METHOD=none BROWSER_ONLY=no BOOTPROTO=none DEFROUTE=yes IPV4_FAILURE_FATAL=yes IPV6INIT=no IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes IPV6_DEFROUTE=yes

On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 09:09, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 12:54 AM, Tony Mountifield wrote: >>>>>

Dear Members, Please tell me how can I fix this problem. Against allow imap on firewalld, I cannot access to the server. [root at speedex ~]# telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 110 Trying 153.153.xxx.xxx... telnet: connect to address 153.153.xxx.xxx: No route to host After stopping forewalld I can access to the server. [root at speedex ~]# telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 110 Trying 153.153.xxx.xxx... Connected to

On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:17, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 02:03 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>>>>

On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote: >>> >>> On 16 February 2017 at 10:42, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> On 02/16/2017 02:32 AM, James

Dear CentOS-Community, we are facing the following issue: A secondary ip address seems to be automatically added to a nic which causes several issues in our setup. This server is equipped with four nics which are currently in use: # nmcli con show NAME????? UUID????????????????????????????????? TYPE????? DEVICE eno2????? cb6fcb54-be52-4ab6-8324-88091a0ea1a0? ethernet? eno2 eno4?????

On 02/16/2017 04:20 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 16 February 2017 at 12:02, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: >> On 16 February 2017 at 11:46, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com> wrote: >>> On 16 February 2017 at 11:35, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>> On 02/16/2017 03:28 AM, James Hogarth wrote:

Here I sit in my hotel room with my Cubie armv7 server with Centos7. They have an ethernet cable here, so most likely I will not need to resort to putting a WiFi USB dongle and trying to master nmcli. But I have to web authenticate to their portal with my personal information. Is that possible with a text web browser? I seem to recall that Centos has one. What to install? Of course,

Hi, I have tried the qemu-ifup script as below with nmcli command as brctl is deprecated on rhel8, but the guest network can not work. I think the script needs update. Could you please help to have a look? Thank you in advance. 1. prepare a linux bridge on the host named br0; 2. prepare the qemu-ifup script as below: # cat /etc/qemu-ifup #!/bin/bash # A br0 bridge should be already set up. #

Once upon a time, Lists <lists at benjamindsmith.com> said: > I understand that it's possible to allow the 4 VM guest systems to each have a > "direct" fixed IP address and access the addresses \via the host network > adapter, while the host retains its fixed IP. If you are running NetworkManager (the default), it's not too hard. Here's an example