similar to: mount bind problem

On 04/12/2016 05:37 AM, Sylvain CANOINE wrote: > > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "????" <tadao at creative-japan.org> ?: "centos" >> <centos at centos.org> Envoy?: Mardi 12 Avril 2016 08:17:13 Objet: >> [CentOS] mount bind problem > >> I have set on fstab /home with 'mount bind' but it seems like bind >> is not

In /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, there's "mount -a -n -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2i,glusterfs -O no_netdev". I have other same type servers. And on other servers with same /etc/fstsb, file system is correct. There's no difference between normal server's rc.sysinit and this problem server's rc.sysinit too. Please tell me other possibility which I have to check.

Dear Robert, Before sending 'grep -r /home /etc' data, I want tell you what happned this morning. In order to solve the /home/home problem, 'umount /home' had been done, system had been running in a normal file system. But suddenly /home has been lost. Key information of that time is as in the **** lines. And I found in the //// lines messages log. How do you think the reason

On CentOS7 df shows not correct data about /dev/vdb # df Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/centos-root 13105152 2695388 10409764 21% / devtmpfs 8140264 0 8140264 0% /dev tmpfs 8150940 0 8150940 0% /dev/shm tmpfs 8150940 839576 7311364 11% /run tmpfs

On 04/13/2016 08:44 PM, ???? wrote: > # mount > /dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_root on / type ext4 (rw,usrquota,grpquota) > proc on /proc type proc (rw) > sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw) > devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,gid=5,mode=620) > tmpfs on /dev/shm type tmpfs (rw) > /dev/vda1 on /boot type ext4 (rw) > /dev/vdb on /mnt/extradiskA type ext4 (rw,usrquota,grpquota) >

Dear Robert, Thank you. The state after reboot are as follows. # LANG=C lsblk NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT sr0 11:0 1 1024M 0 rom vda 252:0 0 15G 0 disk |-vda1 252:1 0 500M 0 part /boot `-vda2 252:2 0 14.5G 0 part |-VolGroup-lv_root (dm-0) 253:0 0

On 04/13/2016 12:02 AM, ???? wrote: > In /etc/rc.d/rc.sysinit, > there's "mount -a -n -t nonfs,nfs4,smbfs,ncpfs,cifs,gfs,gfs2i,glusterfs -O > no_netdev". > > > I have other same type servers. And on other servers with same /etc/fstsb, > file system is correct. > There's no difference between normal server's rc.sysinit and this problem > server's

On CentOS7 I have following firewalld setting. external (active) target: default icmp-block-inversion: no interfaces: eth0 sources: services: dns ftp http https imaps pop3s smtp ssh ports: 110/tcp 21/tcp 20000/tcp 106/tcp 53/tcp 990/tcp 5432/tcp 8447/tcp 113/tcp 143/tcp 3306/tcp 5224/tcp 22/tcp 465/tcp 995/tcp 25/tcp 10000/tcp 8443/tcp 993/tcp 443/tcp 8880/tcp 587/tcp 20/tcp 53/udp

You need to add pop3. Please note that op3 is not secure as password and username is transferred in plain text. *firewall-cmd --add-service=pop3 --permanent* *firewall-cmd --reload--* *Eero* 2016-07-14 11:43 GMT+03:00 Subscriber <ml-lists at agoris.net.ua>: > > Thursday, July 14, 2016, 11:32:31 AM, you wrote: > > > Dear Members, > > > Please tell me how

Dear Gordon Messmer, Thank you. Please teach me one more. By 'firewall-cmd --list' its answer is following. external (active) target: default icmp-block-inversion: no interfaces: eth0 sources: services: dns ftp http https imaps pop3s smtp ssh ports: 110/tcp 21/tcp 20000/tcp 106/tcp 53/tcp 990/tcp 5432/tcp 8447/tcp 113/tcp 143/tcp 3306/tcp 5224/tcp 22/tcp 465/tcp 995/tcp

Ok. try following: firewall-cmd --add-port=110/tcp --permanent firewall-cmd --reload Eero 2016-07-14 12:22 GMT+03:00 ???? <tadao at creative-japan.org>: > I cannot add pop3 with following error. > # firewall-cmd --permanent --zone=external --add-service=pop3 > Error: INVALID_SERVICE: pop3 > > And cannot access to 143 too. > telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 143 > Trying

Dear Members, Please tell me how can I fix this problem. Against allow imap on firewalld, I cannot access to the server. [root at speedex ~]# telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 110 Trying 153.153.xxx.xxx... telnet: connect to address 153.153.xxx.xxx: No route to host After stopping forewalld I can access to the server. [root at speedex ~]# telnet 153.153.xxx.xxx 110 Trying 153.153.xxx.xxx... Connected to

I need to get some absolute redirects working -- basically I set callback hooks to external services, but I want these hooks to use my configured CNAME''s. I''m trying to find a way so that my app doesn''t have to know about these CNAME''s. So I''m looking at the request in the controller to try and get the base URL where I''m running. To

On 04/15/2016 01:05 AM, ???? wrote: > Dear Robert, > > Before sending 'grep -r /home /etc' data, I want tell you what happned this > morning. > > In order to solve the /home/home problem, 'umount /home' had been done, > system had been running in a normal file system. > But suddenly /home has been lost. > > > Key information of that time is as in

those mails list are from last century but i give it a try ! created : https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/563 Hello all, Trying to run an EATON 850pro via USB on a Debian Stretch Stable. I have letsencrypt certificate installed and working. When trying to manage the EATON device, i got: upsmon Can not initialize SSL context When 850pro is connected via USB, i can: lsusb Bus 009

> If you're using NetworkManager, you can "systemctl enable > NetworkManager-wait-online.service" and you won't have to override any > of the individual services. Our security experts don't want me to use NetworkManager... It's even uninstalled on the models, so I understand better why all the required files are not here : # systemctl status

Em 21-12-2015 14:24, James Hogarth escreveu: > On 21 December 2015 at 15:08, Sylvain CANOINE <sylvain.canoine at tv5monde.org> > wrote: > >>> If you're using NetworkManager, you can "systemctl enable >>> NetworkManager-wait-online.service" and you won't have to override any >>> of the individual services. >> Our security experts

----- Mail original ----- > De: "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > ?: "centos" <centos at centos.org> > Envoy?: Mercredi 23 D?cembre 2015 10:11:05 > Objet: Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is up since migrating to 7.2 > I'm a little confused, too. But, it might be more informative to query > the system for

On 22 December 2015 at 10:33, Sylvain CANOINE <sylvain.canoine at tv5monde.org> wrote: > > ----- Mail original ----- > > De: "Marcelo Ricardo Leitner" <marcelo.leitner at gmail.com> > > ?: "centos" <centos at centos.org> > > Envoy?: Lundi 21 D?cembre 2015 21:46:10 > > Objet: Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:51:29AM +0000, Peter Duffy wrote: > I'm also still trying to figure out in what way systemd is supposed to > be "better". I've seen the following things claimed for it: Of the three things you list, hot-plug is certainly an important one. But, it's not the big deal. The big deal is that systemd is not just a fire-and-hope startup system, but