similar to: Network bond - one port goes down from time to time

Am 28.03.16 um 16:23 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: > Em 28-03-2016 06:27, G?tz Reinicke escreveu: >> Hi, >> >> may be someone has an idea: >> >> We have three supermicron servers with two 10Gb Ports each, connected >> to a cisco switch stack 1Gb ports. All are on auto speed. >> >> I configured a LACP bond on both sides on all servers, first

Am 28.03.16 um 12:12 schrieb Leon Fauster: > Am 28.03.2016 um 11:27 schrieb G?tz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>: >> We have three supermicron servers with two 10Gb Ports each, connected to a cisco switch stack 1Gb ports. All are on auto speed. >> >> I configured a LACP bond on both sides on all servers, first with citrix xen server. >> >> On

Am 29.03.16 um 13:57 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: > Em 29-03-2016 03:46, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator escreveu: >> Am 28.03.16 um 16:23 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: >>> Em 28-03-2016 06:27, G?tz Reinicke escreveu: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> may be someone has an idea: >>>> >>>> We have three supermicron servers with

Em 29-03-2016 03:46, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator escreveu: > Am 28.03.16 um 16:23 schrieb Marcelo Ricardo Leitner: >> Em 28-03-2016 06:27, G?tz Reinicke escreveu: >>> Hi, >>> >>> may be someone has an idea: >>> >>> We have three supermicron servers with two 10Gb Ports each, connected >>> to a cisco switch stack 1Gb ports. All are on

Am 28.03.2016 um 11:27 schrieb G?tz Reinicke <goetz.reinicke at filmakademie.de>: > We have three supermicron servers with two 10Gb Ports each, connected to a cisco switch stack 1Gb ports. All are on auto speed. > > I configured a LACP bond on both sides on all servers, first with citrix xen server. > > On one server eth0 goes down from time to time ? maybe within minutes,

Em 28-03-2016 06:27, G?tz Reinicke escreveu: > Hi, > > may be someone has an idea: > > We have three supermicron servers with two 10Gb Ports each, connected to a cisco switch stack 1Gb ports. All are on auto speed. > > I configured a LACP bond on both sides on all servers, first with citrix xen server. > > On one server eth0 goes down from time to time ? maybe within

On 3/28/2016 11:44 PM, G?tz Reinicke - IT Koordinator wrote: >> How is your interface exactly configured ? > TYPE=Bond #Interface type set to bond > BOOTPROTO=static > BONDING_MASTER=yes > BONDING_OPTS="mode=4" #i set mode to active-backup > DEFROUTE=yes > IPADDR="192.168.xxx.xxx" > NETMASK=255.255.255.0 > GATEWAY="192.168.xxx.xxx"

I put this page together just so I won't spam the board anymore begging for help..lol http://bobhoffman.com/vmissue.html This shows a working effort of bonded eths, bridged into a vm, and a few other things. The only missing thing is something on the host that ends up putting the VM internet connection into some kind of limbo. Whether it is hardware related, bug related, libvirt nat

Hi, I'm looking for some recommendations for a "fast" fileserver regarding the hardware you use. We have different fileservers as our requirements changed over time. The "main" problem we are faced with is, that with smb (windows 7 and OS X) clients we never get really close to GBit speed on reads or writes. Using the same servers/storages with ftp, ssh, rsync, nfs we

Hi, I am trying to use Link-aggregation with redundancy between switches that doesnot support SMLT in switches. I have 4 network ports. First two are connected to a switch and LACP/LAG is enabled. Third and Fourth ports connect to another switch with another LAG group. I was thinking create two mode 4 bonds and bond those bonds to mode 1 (Active/Passive) bond. But it seems this is not

Hi, I've using linux bonding in active-backup mode to combine two pairs of GigE NICs (eth0/eth1, eth2/eth3) into two logical bonds (bond0/bond1). All is working fine. However, I would like to specify a primary interface for each bond. This means I need to specify different options to the bonding module for each bond. I have tried every conceivable incantation of options and cannot get the

Hello, I have VM attached to bridge br0. VM can see the network (ping works) when the bridge has ethernet interfaces. But when I create bond or team device and attach it to a bridge instead of eth interface, VM does not ping anymore. Any ideas why? Thanks, Nerijus

Hi, I do have one iscsi storage with 4 GBit nics of which currently only one is configured with an ip and which is in productive use by one cent os 6.3 server. Doing some research brought me to the idea to use some nic bonding or multipathing for that storage, but multipathing I did about four or five years ago only once :) Furthormore I can't find the ultimate answer (may be there is not

Hi guys, I am trying to get bonding work on a debian etch system. I searched already in the mailing list but unfortunately I couldnt find a proper solution. This is what i did so far. - Installed Debian Etch on my server - Installed the following packages for using Xen from the Debian repository: xen-hypervisor-3.0.3-1-i386-pae linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686 linux-image-2.6.18-5-xen-686 xen-tools

On 01/30/2016 07:59 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:48:26 +0100 > >> On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >>> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>>>> As subject

On 01/30/2016 07:59 AM, David Miller wrote: > From: Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> > Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 22:48:26 +0100 > >> On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: >>> Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>>>> As subject

Greetings all. This has been an ongoing issue for me for a few months, and I''ve been trying to get an answer. My server has two NICs, and I want to set up the following: NICs (x2) -> bond (mode 5) -> Xen Bridge -> Doms ...however, trying to configure this doesn''t seem to work: network-bridge steals eth0 instead of bond0, which breaks the bond AND my networking. The

Hi, may be there are some best practice suggestions for the "best mode" for channel bonding interface? Or in other words, when should/would I use which mode? E.g. I do have some fileservers connected to the users lan and to some ISCSI Storages. Or some Webservers only connected to the LAN. The switches are all new cisco models. I've read sone docs (1), (2) and (3) so the theory

On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > >> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>> As subject says, 802.3ad bonding is not working with virtio network model. >>> >>> The only errors I see is: >>> >>> No 802.3ad response from the link partner for any adapters

On 01/29/2016 10:45 PM, Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Nikolay Aleksandrov <nikolay at cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > >> On 01/25/2016 05:24 PM, Bj?rnar Ness wrote: >>> As subject says, 802.3ad bonding is not working with virtio network model. >>> >>> The only errors I see is: >>> >>> No 802.3ad response from the link partner for any adapters