similar to: Thunderbird can not import S/MIME certificate

Hi all, We're testing TLS and SRTP on Asterisk 1.8.10.0 and have it working with a commerical (not self-sign) AlphaSSL wildcard (GlobalSign) using Blink Lite 1.6.2 as per https://wiki.asterisk.org/wiki/display/AST/Secure+Calling+Tutorial We've tested with Bria on an iPhone and that doesn't recognised the commercial CA (GlobalSign Root CA). On a Yealink 28P with V60/V61 is registers

I have a doubt about the ssl certificates and I believe that doing here already solves some doubt that somebody has it. Can I use self-signed certificates, for example, certificates that I obtained with GlobalSign, or do I need to be locally generated non-validated certificates? On Fri, Aug 10, 2018 at 9:07 AM Rowland Penny via samba < samba at lists.samba.org> wrote: > On Fri, 10 Aug

I've been experimenting with dovecot-1.0-stable on Solaris. Storage format is mbox. Dovecot, in test, runs in parallel with an UW IMAP, with dovecot running SSL-only on port 994. It seems to work to some extent: * dovecot runs * authentication works * SSL works * all manual IMAP functionality checks seem to work fine However, I'm running into issues with IMAP clients. * Null

Hi, ldapsearch with an ldaps-URL stopped working recently, probably with the update from openssl 1.0.0 to openssl 1.0.1. On a server with up-to-date packages (openssl-1.0.1e-16.el6_5.x86_64, openldap-clients-2.4.23-32.el6_4.1.x86_64) I get the following errors when issuing an ldapsearch (some parts anonymized): [bad]# ldapsearch -H "ldaps://ldap.domain.org:6636/" -D <binddn>

May be a little bit off topic, but this gave me hard laugh: http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/09/24/sysadmin_file_tools/ Windows admins use a virtualized CentOS machine to copy files because their own tools are not able to handle copying a bigger amount of data. :) Cheers, Timo

Hi, I'm getting increasingly paranoid. Something I said on a certain social media site several months ago was modified - then reported - then by account was banned until I agreed to delete it. Obviously since what I said was modified I didn't have any issue with deleting it but I want more than just DKIM sigs on my e-mail now. Anyway looking for S/MIME I can use to sign and/or

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I just did my daily news scan and saw some screenshots that illustrate the press release [0] announcing the first collisions at the LHC. Those screenshots show windows and buttons that exactly match my CentOS GNOME Desktop [1]. AFAIK, SuSE/Novell has different skins, as has (Open)Solaris and AIX, for instance. So, has there anybody more

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi (Ralph), I'd like to edit my personal page (would be nice to link images from here to the interview); could you please grant me the appropriate permissions? TIA, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLsf9cfg746kcGBOwRAqyOAKCL3MNTytzJQFwTZLlGZK8dosQ6bQCeM9Vc Nb1FSj82NIfv64MfY21MHy4= =KaiJ -----END PGP

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, I'd like to translate the orignal page into a german one. http://wiki.centos.org/Manuals/ReleaseNotes/CentOSLiveCD5.5/German Could you (@Ralph) please create it? TIA Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFL5+cIfg746kcGBOwRAiQVAJ9QdqD1Pdm5fVte59v7zBdStjWahgCdGDZa 59kYF9j2CQhbMfdH0Raunzo= =TL76

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 There's progress... http://press.redhat.com/2010/10/18/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-release-candidate-available-to-partners/ Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMvEWlfg746kcGBOwRAtHpAJ9/ylHRb8hAIBp4mvaNSPN36qrkzACfafrY 628MfhiRdSkK+9FWRuE8wJQ= =NtpF -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have a weird (?) problem here on a setup running CentOS 5.3 x86_64 (and OpenVZ, and some home-brew L2TP daemons, RIPd, BGPd, etc). There's a (VE in OpenVZ speak) virtual machine that has two ethernet interfaces, seen as eth0 and eth1, respectively. Those live in VLANs, but it's not important here. The thing is that on eth1 the

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Could anyone with the appropriate rights please create the C3-EOL page? Thanks in advance, Timo - -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: [CentOS-devel] EOL plans for C3 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:50:46 +0200 From: Timo Schoeler <timo.schoeler at riscworks.net> To: The CentOS developers mailing list. <centos-devel at centos.org>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 thus Karanbir Singh spake: > On 01/05/2011 04:03 PM, Timo Schoeler wrote: >> Sure, this is what I understand. However, does this exclude people >> willing to help (read: raising the manpower of the project rebuilding >> RHEL)? If so, yes, I misunderstood. >> > > Thats bonkers. There *was* a specific callout for help,

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, just installed their NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-180.44-pkg2 driver. I had it running on my CentOS 5.2 x64 machine, and I'm happily surprised that it builds and runs okay on 5.3 also. Cheers, Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi, a german IT news site [0] today posted that Amazon Linux AMI is based on CentOS 5.5 -- is that true? Maybe this would be stuff for the next newsletter... ;) Cheers, Timo http://www.golem.de/1009/78088.html -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFMl2Nxfg746kcGBOwRAg8sAKCelTvLYTNxVBjtOxteb7/hQY2eowCfYFzP

Hi list, just out of curiosity: Was anybody affected by this? http://lists.ntp.org/pipermail/questions/2012-August/033611.html Cheers, Timo

Hi, I accidentally found that the existence of a file e.g. named ifcfg-eth1:1 put in /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ leads to the appropriate interface being created even with the option 'ONBOOT' set to 'no': DEVICE="eth1:1" BOOTPROTO="static" NM_CONTROLLED="no" ONBOOT="no" TYPE="Ethernet" IPADDR=12.34.56.78

Hi list, during the last days there was a discussion going on about the stability of XFS; though I myself used XFS heavily and didn't run into issues yet, I'd like to ask something *before* we create our next generation data storage backend... Les Mikesell wrote in [0] about issues in the combination of XFS and LVM -- however, it was being discussed in context of using 32bit kernels.

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hi list, I have an IBM xseries 345, running CentOS 5.3, hosting a few Xen domUs. However, I need more RAM -- but cannot remember if all (four) RAM sockets are populated (which would mean to buy higher capacity modules) or if there are two slots left to use. However, I'd like (and think that it's possible, but don't remember how) to

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 http://press.redhat.com/2010/04/21/red-hat-enterprise-linux-6-beta-available-today-for-public-download/ ...says it all. Have phun! Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFLzuMEfg746kcGBOwRAgjYAJ9QkJvm40sOVAOcUk4edQ98bM5CKgCgomte W8RuS+4FvyB/54jUnP+bT+A= =m6zn -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----