similar to: Nearly Instant Karma

The Karma Hall Of Fame is now available at: http://bugs.digium.com/karma_halloffame.php Users with negative karma aren't named'n'shamed.. YET.. but congrats to all the users with positive karma on the current list! The list shows all users holding the top 10 karma scores in the system. Right now you need a 12 or above to feature on the list, and there's a boat load of people just

Hi Andy, trying to catch my late here and there, keep in mind that my below comments may be missing things... 2016-04-24 23:30 GMT+02:00 Andy R <spinner+NUTlist at delphinidae.org.uk>: > On 17/04/2016 21:49, Charles Lepple wrote: > >> On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Andy R - (NUT-List) >> <spinner+NUTlist at delphinidae.org.uk> wrote: >> >>>

http://www.digitalnetworksna.com/shop/_templates/item_main_Rio.asp?model=220&cat=53 Bottom line 20GB player with Vorbis and FLAC support. <p>--- >8 ---- List archives: http://www.xiph.org/archives/ Ogg project homepage: http://www.xiph.org/ogg/ To unsubscribe from this list, send a message to 'vorbis-request@xiph.org' containing only the word 'unsubscribe' in the

Hello everyone, Stopped by Best Buy last night and picked up a Rio Karma. Since from-the-trenches reviews seem scarce, I thought I might post some thoughts. The short story: I'm probably returning it, will be buying a different portable player. The software doesn't work, and I don't think I wanna screw with it. The long story: It looks cool, is tiny,

On 17/04/2016 21:49, Charles Lepple wrote: > On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Andy R - (NUT-List) > <spinner+NUTlist at delphinidae.org.uk> wrote: >> >> It looks like you were right. I've tried building both the patch >> against the stable 2.7.4 source and using the latest source tarball >> you've just created. The builds both went fine and seem to run as

Hi, Tavis Ormandy found some bugs in OpenSSL's ASN.1 and buffer code that can be exploited to cause a heap overflow: http://lists.grok.org.uk/pipermail/full-disclosure/2012-April/086585.html Fortunately OpenSSH's sshd is not vulnerable - it has avoided the use of ASN.1 parsing since 2002 when Markus wrote a custom RSA verification function (openssh_RSA_verify):

Dear Mongrel Users, It appears that Francis still isn''t satisfied with my attempts to apologize and he''s now asked me privately to retract my statements. So, just to be sure he finally gets it: I retract my statements that Francis and his friends are "shady" and "desperate for cash". He is in no way a shady guy, having dealt with this situation with the

Hi all, Is there any command or function to withdraw a command performed already in R? For instance, after drawing a line in existing plot, can I remove the line in the plot? I know I can use a way of overlapping on the former line so that it looks like a removing the line, but I'm wondering there is a command to retract the already performed command. Thanks. YN [[alternative HTML

> From: Douglas Bates [mailto:bates at bates4.stat.wisc.edu] > > "Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw at merck.com> writes: > > > Sorry. I need to retract my claim. There seems to be a 3G > limit, even > > though the OS could handle nearly 8G. (I can have two > simultaneous R > > processes each using near 3G.) > > > > On another note, on

> From: Douglas Bates [mailto:bates at bates4.stat.wisc.edu] > > "Liaw, Andy" <andy_liaw at merck.com> writes: > > > Sorry. I need to retract my claim. There seems to be a 3G > limit, even > > though the OS could handle nearly 8G. (I can have two > simultaneous R > > processes each using near 3G.) > > > > On another note, on

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 10:46 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue 25-06-19 12:52:18, Dan Williams wrote: > [...] > > > Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst > > > > That document has failed to preclude symbol export fights in the past > > and there is a reasonable argument to try not to retract functionality > > that had

On Apr 16, 2016, at 9:08 PM, Andy R - (NUT-List) <spinner+NUTlist at delphinidae.org.uk> wrote: > > It looks like you were right. I've tried building both the patch against the stable 2.7.4 source and using the latest source tarball you've just created. The builds both went fine and seem to run as they should. The Arch source build scripts are pretty clear to manipulate at

On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 12:01 PM Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org> wrote: > > On Tue 25-06-19 11:03:53, Dan Williams wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2019 at 8:01 AM Michal Hocko <mhocko at kernel.org> wrote: > > > > > > On Tue 25-06-19 09:23:17, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:24:48AM -0700, Dan Williams wrote: >

On Mon, 11 Jun 2012 08:56:21 -0700 Jakob Stoklund Olesen <stoklund at 2pi.dk> wrote: > > On Jun 11, 2012, at 8:07 AM, Hal Finkel wrote: > > > Also, I think the following might work well: If we add a special > > kind of register dependency called a 'remembered' register. This is > > not a real dependency meaning that that the instruction does not >

Ok thank's for your time David, the PSUs, I have two old ones, are working very well. I simply put in new batteries and on they go :-). I'm using the PSUs mostly to secure my Raspberry PIs, which are notorious to fail (SD card) on power failures. Bye, jrb. On Fri, Jan 3, 2020 at 7:35 PM David Zomaya <David_Zomaya at tripplite.com> wrote: > > Hi Jean-Roch, > No. There is no

I got my hands on a HP t5720. This was designed as a thin-client workstation (originally Windows XPembedded, talking to a Windows terminal server). It's not very powerful, with an AMD Geode NX 1500 (1.0 GHz), 256Mb RAM (16MB used for video) and a 512Mb flash "hard disk". I plugged in a USB DVD drive and was able to boot "linux rescue" from a C5.4 32bit disk, and it

On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 3:04 PM, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com> wrote: > 2017-05-21 2:58 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>: >> After long term efforts of fixing non-common clock implementations, >> clk_disable() is a no-op for a NULL pointer input, and this is now >> tree-wide consistent. >> >> All clock

2017-05-21 2:58 GMT+09:00 Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro at socionext.com>: > After long term efforts of fixing non-common clock implementations, > clk_disable() is a no-op for a NULL pointer input, and this is now > tree-wide consistent. > > All clock consumers can safely call clk_disable(_unprepare) without > NULL pointer check. > > Signed-off-by: Masahiro Yamada

On Tue 25-06-19 12:52:18, Dan Williams wrote: [...] > > Documentation/process/stable-api-nonsense.rst > > That document has failed to preclude symbol export fights in the past > and there is a reasonable argument to try not to retract functionality > that had been previously exported regardless of that document. Can you point me to any specific example where this would be the

On 30/01/15 16:55, Hans-Kristian Bakke wrote: > I still do not follow you. An additional reason for including > administrator in the first place, not including that I actually want > it to work against the linux boxes like every other domain user, was > because winbind returns the exact same mapping when using idmap > backend RID with range 300000-499999 (i.e not rfc2307 attributes)