similar to: Update on Kernel panic executing gkrellm.

Just a heads up, since I know gkrellm is in EPEL and not in the main CentOS repos. However, something fairly fundamental has changed, as prior to updating, gkrellm worked fine, but now every time I execute gkrellm the kernel panics. I'm going to triage on a different machine, as the panic corrupted at least one system library used by nautilus, but rpm -Va is your friend in these

On 04/02/2015 10:33 AM, Lamar Owen wrote: > That's why I still hope it's local to my machine. But now to try to > reproduce on other hardware. (for reference, hardware on which I saw > the bug is a Dell Precision M6500 with a Core i7-740QM and an AMD/ATI > Firepro 7820M video, with / on a Samsung PM830 SSD) Ok, I can't reproduce on my Precision M4300 with a Core 2 Duo

On 04/02/2015 04:35 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote: > > If you can share the original backtraces, it already helps and someone > may even point you to a fix if it's a known issue. > > Ok, I have the vmcore, but the debuginfo for kernel 3.10.0-229.1.2.el7.x86_64 I can't find. Found and installed for kernel 3.10.0-123.13.2.el7.x86_64 but that doesn't help me

Hi All After upgrading to 7.2, I'm getting an immediate kernel panic on boot Dropping back to 3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 and the system boots fine How can I go about diagnosing the problem here? thanks Duncan

Heads-up to everyone: CR is getting CentOS 7.1511 (aka '7.2') packages..... just updated using CR, and, yeah, GNOME 3.14 is a bit different from 3.8...... several things are in different places on the screen. I did have to re-setup my triple monitor settings to have the laptop's display in the center and the two other displays as one on the left and one on the right. The good

All, This is just a heads-up that the new C7 update kernel breaks ABI compatibility, at least as far as using the ELrepo nVidia drivers is concerned. I have posted more details to the ELrepo list; but since many folks use the Elrepo kmods I thought a heads-up would be appropriate. If you use the ELrepo nvidia kmod you will either need to hold off on the kernel update or uninstall the nvidia

On 8/1/20 5:00 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > > I would wait and install everything as a group. We should have > something soon. First off, Johnny and all of the rest of the CentOS team, thank you for your efforts! Second, to all with this problem, I too experienced the issue (I posted on the CentOS-Devel list my findings).? To those who seem to think more testing could have prevented

On 02/04/2015 02:08 PM, Lamar Owen wrote: > > 3.) Attacker uses a large graphics card's GPU power, harnessed with > CUDA or similar, to run millions of bruteforce attempts per second on > the exfiltrated /etc/shadow, on their computer (not yours). > 4.) After a few hours, attacker has your password (or at least a > password that hashes to the same value as your password),

On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 12:03:52PM -0800, Akemi Yagi wrote: > On Fri, Mar 3, 2017 at 9:16 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > > All, > > > > This is just a heads-up that the new C7 update kernel breaks ABI > > compatibility, at least as far as using the ELrepo nVidia drivers is > > concerned. I have posted more details to the ELrepo list; but since

Hello, On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 11:04:28 -0500 Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 12/19/2016 08:44 AM, ken wrote: > > Last night installed the latest, firefox-45.6.0-1.el7.centos.x86_64. > Fired it up this morning and within the first hour it's crashed three > times. That comes to it being usable for about five minutes before it > crashes. > > > >

On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 01/24/2017 11:29 PM, Sandro Bonazzola wrote: > >> Hi, >> the latest qemu-kvm-ev has been tagged for testing. >> Please give it a run and provide feedback. >> If nothing against it shows up, we'll tag it for release on Friday. >> >> Is it considered normal for the test

Changing the subject line for good ... On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On Thursday, April 07, 2011 11:23:51 AM Brunner, Brian T. wrote: >> AIUI: In previous releases, RH distributed source + patches. ?Starting >> 6.0 RH releases patched source. ?This makes backing out a patch, or >> backporting patches from future development in

On Mon, 15 Mar 2021 at 16:26, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 3/15/21 8:51 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > Exactly that. Upstream Fedora and RHEL went to require dual density > around > > Fedora 18, RHEL-7 because the amount of data was too much. > Well, what's odd is that the actual upstream RHEL 7.9 DVD WILL fit on a > single-layer DVD. Just

Hi all, Since the vault for 7.3.1611 has been cleared out last sunday (20170207) - why is that? - I'm using git to download a "SRPM", or more accurately, its contents. However, using git has one major drawback: It is missing checksums for the files. Are there any plans to provide checksums for the files in git so I can be sure that what I download is actually not tampered with?

sshd also dies when certain other kinds of traffic is generated, such as `man pw' using the most pager[1], and many x11 apps such as emacs. However, it is stable when running simple x11 apps such as xeyes, and the link its self is stable -- a terminal will stay connected without issue for days, as long as not much happens in it. Also a sshfs connection dies immediately. ssh -Y karren gkrellm

Hi, I checked the sendmail and it is: [root at godslove root]# which sendmail /usr/sbin/sendmail Plesk uses sendmail and this is what is listed in my form that was working. I tried my form at 7:27 am this morning and this is the last listing in /var/log/messages Jul 3 07:05:42 godslove authpsa: IMAP connect from @ [67.138.221.157] There are no listings in /var/log/maillog. These are the

As much as I hate to be the bearer of news, I saw over 400 updates this morning on my upstream 6.1 box.... checking the upstream website, yeah, EL6.2 is out, at least for updates. I didn't see ISO's in my subscribed channel yet, though. I figured someone would notice soon enough. So before anyone goes into flame mode, think about the difficulties that have faced the CentOS developers in

Ran into a bit of a sticky wicket today. And for reasons that should be obvious it was a bit difficult to google for a solution, so I backed out the upgrade. So I'm hoping someone here has seen and fixed this already. System: CentOS 7, fully updated. After the nss updates in the past day or so, visiting https://www.google.com with Firefox results in the following error screen: Secure

On Fri, Feb 13, 2015 at 7:12 AM, Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu> wrote: > On 02/13/2015 05:41 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > This is also why the Orange Book and its Rainbow kin exist (Orange Book = > 5200.28-STD, aka DoD Trusted Computer System Evaluation Criteria). > Should anyone care to learn from the Rainbow Books, they are available from the United States of America (USA)

Am 28.01.2016 um 18:47 schrieb Lamar Owen <lowen at pari.edu>: > On 01/28/2016 12:18 PM, Michael Hennebry wrote: >> >> Not entirely useless. >> Not everyone has to deal with systemd yet. >> For such people, "How hard should I work to avoid it?" is an important issue. >> > Michael Corleone, the God Father Part I: "Keep your friends close,