similar to: A repo with latest httpd for http2?

On 02/12/2016 10:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 2/12/2016 11:13 AM, SternData wrote: >> Is there a well-run package repo that has httpd-2.4.17 or mod_http2 (or >> mod_h2)? > > EL7 comes with httpd-2.4... > > # yum list httpd > ... > Installed Packages > httpd.x86_64 2.4.6-40.el7.centos @base Including support for http2? i doubt that. As far as i know,

On 02/12/2016 04:26 PM, Guolin Cheng wrote: > How about here, if you are using centos 6. > > http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/httpd24/ > > On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > >> On 02/12/2016 10:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: >> >>> On 2/12/2016 11:13 AM, SternData wrote: >>> >>>> Is

How about here, if you are using centos 6. http://mirror.centos.org/centos/6/SCL/x86_64/httpd24/ On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Ulf Volmer <u.volmer at u-v.de> wrote: > On 02/12/2016 10:54 PM, John R Pierce wrote: > >> On 2/12/2016 11:13 AM, SternData wrote: >> >>> Is there a well-run package repo that has httpd-2.4.17 or mod_http2 (or >>> mod_h2)?

On 2/12/2016 11:13 AM, SternData wrote: > Is there a well-run package repo that has httpd-2.4.17 or mod_http2 (or > mod_h2)? EL7 comes with httpd-2.4... # yum list httpd ... Installed Packages httpd.x86_64 2.4.6-40.el7.centos @base -- john r pierce, recycling bits in santa cruz

Now that 7.4 CR has delivered OpenSSL 1.0.2, I should be able to serve http/2 pages to Chrome, but I still see messages that ALPN is not enabled. OpenSSL 1.0.2 is installed: $ rpm -qa |grep openssl openssl-libs-1.0.2k-8.el7.x86_64 openssl-1.0.2k-8.el7.x86_64 But https://tools.keycdn.com/http2-test says "www.stevenstern.me" supports http 2 but ALPN is not supported. Ideas? Does

Hi, Am rebuilding httpd from scratch to enable http2 and minimize extra modules on Cent Os 8. Am having trouble understanding the spec file [0] and systemd initialization [1][2][3] (these are very similar to those extracted from [4]). Why are 3 scripts needed to start the service and why is a pid setting not needed as used in the httpd.service file at [5]? Benson [0]

On 1/30/19 5:57 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jan 2019 at 00:25, SternData <subscribed-lists at sterndata.com> > wrote: > >> This keeps logging: >> >> Could not get metalink >> https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 error >> was >> 14: HTTPS Error 503 - Service Unavailable >> >> I've

This keeps logging: Could not get metalink https://mirrors.fedoraproject.org/metalink?repo=epel-7&arch=x86_64 error was 14: HTTPS Error 503 - Service Unavailable I've removed the epel-release package, done a "yum clean all", then reinstalled it, but still get the same error. -- -- Steve

Hello, my test have this ./check_metalink --repo epel --check-master Testing repo=epel, arch=i386 Metalink provided by: proxy02.fedoraproject.org Server date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:05:26 GMT Repo epel, arch i386 errored: list index out of range Testing repo=epel, arch=x86_64 Metalink provided by: proxy02.fedoraproject.org Server date: Thu, 31 Jan 2019 14:05:27 GMT

Another concern is that Apple is planning to discontinue the binary notification-submission endpoint late this year --- it's been replaced by a (significantly nicer, IMHO) http2-based endpoint, but a quick look at the xaps daemon looks like it's using the old protocol.

Hello GlusterFS users, can anybody give me please his opinion about the following facts and questions: 4 storage server with 16 SATA bays, connected by GigE: Q1: Volume will be set up as distributed-replicated. Maildir, FTP Dir, htdocs, file store directory => as sub dir's in one big GlusterVolume or each dir in it's own GlusterVolume? Q2: Set up the bricks as a collection of

Hello, from time to time I keep getting problems with some emails causing signal 6. I've already reported those, but it seems not to be easy to find the cause. From the logs, it seems to occur in sieve implementation. I've checked the email envelopes tody by accident, probably this part of my telnet session might help: a11 fetch 1 all * 1 FETCH (RFC822.SIZE 16750 INTERNALDATE

On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 06:18:07PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > Am rebuilding httpd from scratch to enable http2 and minimize extra modules > on Cent Os 8. Am having trouble understanding the spec file [0] and systemd > initialization [1][2][3] (these are very similar to those extracted from > [4]). Why are 3 scripts needed to start the service and why is a pid setting > not needed

On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:05?AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 4/25/24 17:01, Ivan Krylov via R-devel wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:45:04 +0200 > > Jeroen Ooms <jeroenooms at gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Thoughts? > > How verboten would it be to create an empty external pointer object, > > add it to the

Am 2016-01-17 17:47, schrieb SternData: > On 01/17/2016 10:42 AM, Joey wrote: >> Dual-Screen Solution without connected a second Monitor > > What is a dual screen solution without a second monitor? Are you > talking about virtual desktops? Yes. if this virtual Desktop is useable like a normal Desktop (for example change position in kde systemsettings)

Hi All, I think there is a memory error in the libcurl connection code that typically happens when libcurl reads big chunks of data. This potentially affects all code that use url() with the libcurl download method, which is the default in most builds. In practice it tends to happen more with HTTP/2 and if the connection is wrapped into a gzcon(). macOS Catalina has a libcurl build with HTTP/2

On 25/05/2020 12:06, Aki Tuomi wrote: >> On 25/05/2020 13:00 Peter Nabbefeld <peter.nabbefeld at gmx.de> wrote: >> >> >> Hello, >> >> from time to time I keep getting problems with some emails causing >> signal 6. I've already reported those, but it seems not to be easy to >> find the cause. From the logs, it seems to occur in sieve

On 05/25/2016 06:43 PM, Always Learning wrote: > > On Wed, 2016-05-25 at 22:32 +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: > >> Also, yum had associations which it was sad to lose. > > Perhaps the Fedora ("We love consulting all affected users") replacement > could be named MUD. > > Now we await the System-D controlling interface ;-) > > > > There was

On 9/8/24 23:14, Jeroen Ooms wrote: > On Mon, Sep 2, 2024 at 10:05?AM Tomas Kalibera <tomas.kalibera at gmail.com> wrote: >> >> On 4/25/24 17:01, Ivan Krylov via R-devel wrote: >>> On Thu, 25 Apr 2024 14:45:04 +0200 >>> Jeroen Ooms <jeroenooms at gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Thoughts? >>> How verboten would it be to create an

On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 12:45:03PM -0500, SternData wrote: > Does that mean it's gone from the CentOS repos or just that PostFix is > the default choice? I believe it means that it won't be in Centos anymore. I also believe the Postifx is already the default choice, Sendmail isn't in the default installation. > > On 9/19/19 6:04 PM, Fred Smith wrote: > > Was