Displaying 20 results from an estimated 50000 matches similar to: "Seeking Clarification CentOS 7 as Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller"
2016 Feb 09
0
Seeking Clarification CentOS 7 as Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller
On 8 February 2016 at 20:41, Mike <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I performed a Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller install in June of
> 2015 on CentOS 7.
> At that time I used the Samba 4.1.XX package from SerNet due to the absence
> of necessary heimdal packages and libraries not provided in the CentOS 7
> Samba package.
> Since the the 4.1 series is on security
2016 Feb 09
0
[SOLVED] Seeking Clarification CentOS 7 as Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller
I'm putting the Centos 7 repository Samba 4 packages on hold.
Going to work with Samba 4 source with embedded heimdal.
I see this suggested often on the samba mailing list.
On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Mike <1100100 at gmail.com> wrote:
> I performed a Samba 4 Active Directory Domain Controller install in June
> of 2015 on CentOS 7.
> At that time I used the Samba 4.1.XX
2015 Sep 11
1
SAMBA as AD DC
Il giorno ven, 11/09/2015 alle 14.25 +0200, Oscar Osta Pueyo ha
scritto:
> Hello,
>
> On 11 September 2015 at 14:04, Dario Lesca <d.lesca at solinos.it>
> wrote:
>
> > Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha
> > scritto:
> > > On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz>
> > > wrote
>
2015 Sep 11
2
SAMBA as AD DC
Il giorno lun, 08/09/2014 alle 20.03 +0100, James Hogarth ha scritto:
> On 8 Sep 2014 17:00, "Frantisek Hanzlik" <franta at hanzlici.cz> wrote
> ...
> >
> > Hi James, thanks for reply. It seems as at SerNet's site have
> > packages
> > for RHEL6/Centos6 only, not for RHEL7/Centos7 or any Fedora
> > versions,
> > at least this.
>
2017 May 25
4
Migrate from sernet-samba to samba4
Hello All,
Is it possible to migrate from 4.2.14-SerNet-RedHat-23.el7 to samba-4.4.4-13.el7_3.x86_64 on centOS7?
I've got two centos7 servers running sernet versions of samba. Both are AD DC's, with 600 users.
If I run yum install samba4, I get a promising error back:
Package samba-4.4.4-13.el7_3.x86_64 is obsoleted by 99:sernet-samba-4.2.14-23.el7.x86_64 which is already installed
So,
2015 Jan 09
3
Member Server SeDiskOperatorPrivilege
It's definitely a problem with backend ad. I don't know what, but with ad backend I also cannot list rpc rights on the server because it cannot find the user. With rid: no problem.
Bug?
Am 9. Januar 2015 17:56:59 MEZ, schrieb Rowland Penny <rowlandpenny at googlemail.com>:
>On 09/01/15 16:48, Tim wrote:
>> Definitely.
>>
>> With backend=ad only two user can be
2015 Apr 16
2
Install Bind with gss-spnego enabled
On 16 Apr 2015 14:29, "Johnny Hughes" <johnny at centos.org> wrote:
>
> On 04/16/2015 06:33 AM, Mike wrote:
> > Hi Johnny,
> >
> > Thank you for your response. I thought to choose the sernet package
> > because of the following stated in Samba Readme:
> >
> > Samba packages shipped in some distributions like e. g. Fedora, RHEL may
>
2016 Apr 06
3
KVM Virtualization Network VLAN CentOS7
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 9:47 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth at gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 6 Apr 2016 2:35 p.m., "Francis Mendoza" <francis at mytechrepublic.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Im configuring my KVM and in my network configuration I have 4 Network
> > lancard
> >
> > 2 nic = using teaming0 for management with access port configured in the
2015 Dec 08
3
Samba4 ad dc with Centos7
Wel, thats wrong, when i to the following.
wbinfo –u i get all my users.
wbinfo –g i get all my groups
getent passwd username i get my user:UID:GID:NAME:homedir:shel
id username gives also the correct info.. (uid= .. gid= ) groups = etc..
And i use winbind on a DC. ( samba 4.2.5 sernet on debian wheezy )
Greetz,
Louis
Van: mathias dufresne
2014 Jul 09
3
Samba DC on CentOS7
Hi guys,
Just installed a CentOS 7 minimal to test samba 4.1.x that's onboard
(until now I always used CentOS 6 + SerNet repo and working like a charm).
But I'm looking to setup a new server and I wanted to use the CentOS
packages to keep things as standard as possible.
so I ran
yum install samba-dc
and it installed samba-common and the other dependecies.
now...
Where the heck is
2020 Apr 02
2
Samba 4.12 python3 and vfs object full_audit (centos7)
Hallo,
I?m using samba 4.11 from sernet and the vfs object full_audit.
After update samba to 4.12 from sernet full_audit is broken and the shares with full_audit are not accessible.
Can anyone tell me please how to install python 3 on centos7 while the Centos system needs python 2 but samba sould use python3?
Thanks in advance,
Peter
2015 Dec 08
5
Samba4 ad dc with Centos7
Hello, I may have a problem with winbind setup.
-with wbinfo -g and wbinfo -u I get all group/user from AD/DC.
-with getent group "Domain Users" and getent passwd "remote_user" I can see
the info about the specific group and specific user.
-with getent group and getent passwd I only see my local group/users.
-I believe that using "getent group" and "getent
2016 Apr 06
3
KVM Virtualization Network VLAN CentOS7
Im configuring my KVM and in my network configuration I have 4 Network
lancard
2 nic = using teaming0 for management with access port configured in the
switch side
2 nic = using teaming1 for guest VM DATA ports. and in the switch is
configured for LACP with trunk allowing vlan 10,20,30,40,50
and configured in the CentOS7 the vlan 10, vlan 20,30,40,50 im sure its
already working because I tried
2015 Jan 09
4
Member Server SeDiskOperatorPrivilege
Hello all,
I have a AD DC based on CentOS7 with sernet samba 4.1.14 with rfc2307 and function level 2008_R2. This one works so far and I can manage the AD from a windows client.
Now I setup a member server based on CentOS7 with sernet samba 4.1.14 just like the wiki advises with the same smb.conf (realm etc is configured to my needs. I joined the AD and configured nsswitch.
wbinfo works so far
2015 Jan 10
2
Member Server SeDiskOperatorPrivilege
Interesting:
I rebuild everything. But after setting up the DCs they had the same issue - net rpc rights grant can't connect to server 127.0.0.1.
I tried the following global parameters in smb.conf:
bind interfaces only = yes
interfaces = lo eth0
And like magic it worked! Samba is now bind to127.0.0.1?(lo) and eth0 and net rpc rights grant works. Try this also on a member server.
Give it a
2016 Feb 07
3
Samba4 AD
Il 07/02/2016 17:07, Rowland penny ha scritto:
> On 07/02/16 15:39, Alessandro Baggi wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> Follow the information you will find here:
>>> https://wiki.samba.org/index.php/Setup_Samba_as_an_AD_Domain_Member
>>>
>>> Rowland
>>>
>>
>> Thank you Rowland for your answer.
>> I've ridden this doc,
2018 Apr 11
3
Ansible repository shenanigans in EL7
For those not aware ansible has been deprecated in RHEL7 from the extras
repository.
In the RHEL specific world it's now in an optional "product" (basically an
optional subscription) that is part of any RHEL subscription, but it's opt
in.
As a result ansible is back in the EPEL7 repository for 2.5.0+ , having
been removed for ansible 2.4.2 when it got introduced to the RHEL
2015 Jun 11
2
NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "johan vermeulen7" <johan.vermeulen7 at telenet.be>
Aan: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org>
Verzonden: Dinsdag 9 juni 2015 18:23:58
Onderwerp: Re: [CentOS] NetworkManager / wireless on latest Centos7 installs
----- Oorspronkelijk bericht -----
Van: "m roth" <m.roth at 5-cent.us>
Aan: "CentOS
2015 May 22
2
Xen4CentOS on Centos7?
Hi all,
Looking to move from VMware to Xen4CentOS. We currently run Centos7 as our servers main distort. All the documentation I?ve found on the Xen4CentOS only refers to Centos6. Do any of you know if it currently or is being developed to work with Centos7?
thanks in advance
2015 Dec 08
2
Version numbering vis a vis CentOS and RHEL
On 7 Dec 2015 23:43, "J Martin Rushton" <martinrushton56 at btinternet.com>
wrote:
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 07/12/15 22:37, Warren Young wrote:
> > On Dec 7, 2015, at 1:52 PM, Greg Lindahl <lindahl at pbm.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Mon, Dec 07, 2015 at 08:57:01PM +0100, Zdenek Sedlak wrote:
> >>