similar to: What to do when you've been hacked?

On Monday, January 25, 2016 11:56:19 AM Warren Young wrote: > On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Benjamin Smith <lists at benjamindsmith.com> wrote: > > We have a prospective client who is asking us what our policy is in the > > event of unauthorized access. > > Tell them you use the Mr. Miyagi defense: ?Don?t get hit.? > > Your prospective client sounds like they?re

On Jan 25, 2016, at 11:04 AM, Benjamin Smith <lists at benjamindsmith.com> wrote: > > We have a prospective client who is asking us what our policy is in the event > of unauthorized access. Tell them you use the Mr. Miyagi defense: ?Don?t get hit.? Your prospective client sounds like they?re expecting someone to have established procedures to deal with breaches. You know who

No, we haven't been hacked. ;) We have a prospective client who is asking us what our policy is in the event of unauthorized access. Obviously you fix the system(s) that have been compromised, but what steps do you take to mitigate the effects of a breach? What is industry best practice? So far, searches haven't produced anything that looks consistent, except maybe identity monitoring

I can''t figure out how to get the collection_select to correctly identify and select the appropriate option in the drop down to begin with. i have checked that charge.offense_level contains the correct value to begin with (a number between 1 and 10) but the view still defaults to the first option and not the one contained in the charge.offense_level. what am i doing wrong? any

The problem with building the frontend on Windows is that gcc cannot be bootstrapped using Window's native compiler -- i.e. VC++ -- unlike every other platform. It can be built on Windows using gcc, of course, but even then only if the entire GNU environment is present. The real problem is that the bootstrapped frontend binaries built using gcc may not properly link with LLVM binaries built

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA256 > On 2/02/2017, at 9:52 pm, A J Stiles <asterisk_list at earthshod.co.uk> wrote: > > <snip> > > but in simple solidarity with everyone who has ever > > been pissed off by a machine-initiated spam marketing phone call at an > > inappropriate moment, I am not going to tell you how to do it. > >

Short story: I need to use a different style of inputs to enter datetimes. What I want is to be able to implement these while still retaining the niceties of the built-in input helpers, like ActiveRecord error handling and automatic reconstitution of a single Date object from multiple form elements. What''s the best way to go about this? Long story: My form has one standard month

On Tue, 2 Nov 2004, Jeff Cohen wrote: > The problem with building the frontend on Windows is that gcc cannot be > bootstrapped using Window's native compiler -- i.e. VC++ -- unlike every > other platform. It can be built on Windows using gcc, of course, but > even then only if the entire GNU environment is present. Yeah, annoying. Unfortunately we're not up to fixing GCC :)

Hi all. I have a need to build a SOAP client using Ruby and Rails. I''m accessing a document/literal style SOAP service. I''ve been poring over documentation (well, there really doesn''t seem to be any, so that''s a little misleading), blog posts, and outdated tutorials all day, and I still don''t really have anywhere to begin. Every tutorial seems to have a

When oFono launched, I announced the project to other projects that it may compliment. oFono has hit the 1.0 Milestone and has some serious backing if you missed my post a year or so ago and never heard of it. Check it out... Thanks, Steve Totaro ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: Marcel Holtmann <marcel at holtmann.org> Date: Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 2:25 PM Subject: oFono 1.0

> I think the main benefit of a scheme like this would be that a pull request > tells a code owner which patches require their attention. As a contributor > it would be nice to see your patch in a queue somewhere rather than just be > buried down the mailing list. When patches are sent to llvm-commits it can > be hard to tell if a code owner has noticed the patch because it is a

Sean Silva <silvas at purdue.edu> writes: >> I think the main benefit of a scheme like this would be that a pull request >> tells a code owner which patches require their attention. As a contributor >> it would be nice to see your patch in a queue somewhere rather than just be >> buried down the mailing list. When patches are sent to llvm-commits it can >> be

On Mon, February 9, 2015 3:14 pm, PatrickD Garvey wrote: > On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 11:12 AM, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >> On 2/9/2015 11:06 AM, Always Learning wrote: >>> The third item was a 16.1 MB PDF of 1,344 pages. A quick scan of the PDF >>> shows every page appears to be readable. 11 pages devoted to BASH. Information on other interesting

Hi list, Well I really didn't want to see things get to this point, but Sherman at Sipura along with their President Jan F. leave me no other choice. SIPURA has been provided a letter from our attorney for Breach of Contract and damages. They have yet to respond. A quick background. 1. Sherman (SIPURA's Director of Marketing), stated that we would do a join press release for the Oct

You can try to run "make" in the linux source-folder. I had the same problem Running FedCore 4 on a Dual Xeon Server and running make fixed the error ________________________________ From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Chris Teesdale Sent: 15 February 2006 12:19 To: asterisk-users@lists.digium.com Subject:

Good day! A few weeks ago, we had a security breach in the company I'm working for, because employees used "ssh -R" to expose systems from our internal network to some SSH server in the outer world. Of course, this is a breach of our internal security policy, but lead us to wonder, whether there is a technical solution to prevent our users from creating SSH-reverse-tunnels. After

On 2 June 2016 at 20:49, Rafael Espindola via llvm-commits <llvm-commits at lists.llvm.org> wrote: > Author: rafael > Date: Thu Jun 2 14:49:53 2016 > New Revision: 271569 > > URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=271569&view=rev > Log: > Start adding tlsdesc support for aarch64. > > This is mostly extracted from http://reviews.llvm.org/D18960. Rafael,

https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8965 Summary: unexpected --exclude behaviour which can lead to a data breach Product: rsync Version: 3.1.0 Platform: All OS/Version: All Status: NEW Severity: major Priority: P5 Component: core AssignedTo: wayned at samba.org

Hi all I have been hacked but no idea how!!! I noticed somebody in Eastern Europe came from an American IP and tried to call loads of international numbers. Thankfully I had no credit with my VOIP out provider so the calls went nowhere. But if I had credit it would all have been used up. I noticed hundreds of calls being made from clid and src being either UNKNOWN or as ASTERISK. Here are a

FYI, folks, Excerpt: Linux Australia discovered the breach on March 24 after it noticed conference management software it uses called Zookeepr started sending a large number of error reporting emails, Hesketh wrote. A server had been attacked two days prior. ?It is the assessment of Linux Australia that the individual utilized a currently unknown vulnerability to trigger a remote buffer overflow