similar to: vpn - xl2tpd and routing to a net?

On 1/26/2016 9:14 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/26/2016 05:37 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> vpn clients with established tunnels can get to VPN server's NICs/IPs >> but cannot get through to the net behind the server. >> Well... they can, but only if on a host (eg. 192.168.2.33) on VPN >> server's net I do: >> >> route add -host 192.168.2.10 gw

On 26/01/16 16:26, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/26/2016 5:37 AM, lejeczek wrote: >> >> I'm having a, I'd like to think a "regular" VPN with >> IPsec/xl2tpd and it all works OK, except.. >> One thing that I never needed but now I do and I >> wonder.... is it my iptables, or/and routing or maybe VPN >> server config..? >> >> vpn

On 1/26/2016 5:37 AM, lejeczek wrote: > > I'm having a, I'd like to think a "regular" VPN with IPsec/xl2tpd and > it all works OK, except.. > One thing that I never needed but now I do and I wonder.... is it my > iptables, or/and routing or maybe VPN server config..? > > vpn clients with established tunnels can get to VPN server's NICs/IPs > but

On 01/26/2016 05:37 AM, lejeczek wrote: > vpn clients with established tunnels can get to VPN server's NICs/IPs > but cannot get through to the net behind the server. > Well... they can, but only if on a host (eg. 192.168.2.33) on VPN > server's net I do: > > route add -host 192.168.2.10 gw 192.168.2.100 # 192.168.2.10 is VPN > client If the VPN isn't

we have an external 2Mbit dsl connection and running on it are several gre vpn tunnels so far i''ve given priority to the vpn traffic (using htb) can i now put rules in for the tunnels to control traffic within each tunnel (that''s where our video conferencing etc runs)? or can i only control the real interface (eth1 in our setup)? if not can i somehow see the packets inside the

Hi, Guus The use case the shared default gateway for multi-tenant, if that the case the node who own the default gateway will have problem to route with different tenant who has overlapped address scope? Is it true when no any other tools like the namespaces? (tenant1)\ (tenant2)——common node—— shared gw node—— Internet (tenant3)/ But if the each tenant have it’s dedicate default gateway, but

Hello, response time: how is it possible to increase the response time on Tinc VPNs. When I use tinc over a fast or giga-bit network connection the ping-response time is normally about 1800 to 2000 ms. Sometimes I get ping response times at about 2.500 to 3.000 ms over a normal Ethernet Connection or a television-cable connection within the same providers-network in the same city. The ping-time

I have set up a VPN over PPTP on a CentOS server using the DKMS module rpm dkms-0-2.0.6-3.el4 from http://centos.karan.org/el4/extras/stable/i386/RPMS/repodata/repovie w/dkms-0-2.0.6-3.el4.kb.html and kernel_ppp_mppe-0.0.5-2dkms.noarch.rpm at http://pptpclient.sourceforge.net/howto-fedora- core-3.phtml. I have configured the pptpd server on Centos4 to use MS_CHAPv2, 128bit encryption and

Hello, i need to configure a centos 6.3 - server as an l2tp/ipsec-client. I have no idea how I there previous or if this is even possible. Where one might find appropriate instructions? Google is not very helpful, without any idea. Thanks cami

One of my user was asking, can he use VPN to access asterisk ? What does it mean ? And its possible ? How ?VPN -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://lists.digium.com/pipermail/asterisk-users/attachments/20090207/325c0670/attachment.htm

> -----Original Message----- > From: asterisk-users-bounces@lists.digium.com [mailto:asterisk-users- > bounces@lists.digium.com] On Behalf Of Biju > Sent: Wednesday, May 02, 2007 5:38 AM > To: 'Asterisk Users Mailing List - Non-Commercial Discussion' > Subject: [asterisk-users] VPN between Asterisk server and phone client > > Hi, > > I wish to make a secure

I am trying shorewall as my previous post With alisias on eth1 loc and 4 pptp client vpns. The odd thing is when I enter one of the vpns in interfaces such as vpn1 it works. But if I enter the vpn in the hosts file shorewall blocks the vpns. shorewall/hosts #ZONE HOST(S) OPTIONS loc eth1:192.168.25.0/24 loctw eth1:192.168.50.0/24 locsa eth1:192.168.75.0/24 vpntw

Hello, We have not so tech-savvy colleagues in different locations around the world who now use Windows 10 and need access to Linux (Debian 9). Linux will be provided in form of VirtualBox VMs. We, the technical support team, need to have access to the guest VMs (via SSH and occasionally as remote desktop) and to the host (through the guest while VM runs in bridged mode; via Windows 10 built in

Hi list, I have to build vpn server for 1500 clients. No encryption necessary. can anyone please recommend me vpn server. I do not have experience on vpn. I have tested openvpn on my test setup, & its working fine. I want to check if there any other vpn server available. I have not checked but can pptp vpn be usefull? My requirement is to connect 1500 clients on vpn server. Need

Hi there! I'm totally new to the concept 'self-made VPNs' :P I've discovered tinc and I think it's not as easy as hamachi, but not so hard as OpenVPN :D Now: I've got 4 questions: question n.1: I'm behind a router. This router is configurable, but I'm also behind a provider's NAT (private IPs with a common public IP). Will tinc work, or it will do as

Hey guys I''ve been beating my head on this for a few hours. Maybe it is just a stupid configuration error you can point me at. First here is a small diagram of what I am trying to configure: http://6bit.com/img/netdiag.png Currently I only have Shorewall running on the host on the right of the diagram until I can get this working then I''ll add it to the other host as well.

Hello, I have an OpenVPN running on a system with Samba 3.0.9. However, with this setting (tun2 is my VPN device): interfaces = tun2, lo bind interfaces only = Yes it doesn't bind to tun2, but to ppp0. What the heck? Tomek

I will shortly be replacing a couple of proprietary VPN boxes with a FreeBSD solution. Section 10.10 of the Handbook has a detailed description of how to do this. However I remember a lot of discussion about a year ago about whether the gif interface was necessary to set up VPNs like this or whether it was just a convenience, for "getting the routing right". A number of people said

I have built a fedora 3 test box that has 4 pptp client vpn''s from my T-1 to a Group of businesses (test environment). The businesses all have pptp vpn concentrators on their ends. The purpose is that all of the businesses will be at an offsite location together for a 3 day sale. I have the box working now with the latest ver of shorewall with two nics on this fedora box eth0 will

I have a NetGear FV318 living in my DMZ, with one of its LAN-ports living in my LOC zone. What rules are needed in shorewall to allow a certain subnet to make connections to this device from the net zone? Do I define it as a tunnel in shorewall/tunnels, or do I just allow some selected traffic to the DMZ IP? I am not sure which of the docs are right for me in this case?