similar to: signing RPM packages with SHA256

On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> hi, >> >> I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 >> >> Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID >> ad3b591d147abf59 >> >> Signatures from CentOS 7 use SHA256 >> >> Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 06 Jan 2016 08:54:58

On 01/20/2016 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>> hi, >>>> >>>> I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 >>>> >>>> Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key

On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>> hi, >>> >>> I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 >>> >>> Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID >>> ad3b591d147abf59 >>> >>> Signatures from

On 01/20/2016 03:32 PM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 01/20/2016 02:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/20/2016 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>>> On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>>>> hi, >>>>>>

On 01/20/2016 02:58 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: > On 01/20/2016 04:52 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >> On 01/20/2016 04:48 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>> On 01/20/2016 04:39 AM, Johnny Hughes wrote: >>>> On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>>> hi, >>>>> >>>>> I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 >>>>>

On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > hi, > > I noticed that RPM packages I sign use SHA1 > > Signature : RSA/SHA1, Fri 08 Jan 2016 10:50:58 AM PST, Key ID > ad3b591d147abf59 > > Signatures from CentOS 7 use SHA256 > > Signature : RSA/SHA256, Wed 06 Jan 2016 08:54:58 AM PST, Key ID > 24c6a8a7f4a80eb5 > > I'm trying to find where / how to

>>>>>> On 01/20/2016 01:37 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >>>>>>> I'm trying to find where / how to use sha256 when I sign packages >>>>>>> but I >>>>>>> am not having much luck. Closest I have found is this : >>>>>>> >>>>>>>

Hello, Is this the proper place to suggest an enhancement for the stock dovecot package ? The enhancement would be the following: For the time being, the dovecotpw utility offers a standardised way to interactively encode a user password in a certain scheme, say: dovecotpw -s CRYPT Enter new passord: Re-enter new password: etc. Given a *valid* /etc/imap.passwd file (passwd-file

Am 24.11.2014 um 13:35 schrieb Johnny Hughes <johnny at centos.org>: > On 11/23/2014 10:23 AM, Niamh Holding wrote: >> >> Hello Centos, >> >> Is 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 really dependent on the 32 bit perl.i386 >> 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 as yum is suggesting, or has something got mixed up on >> the system? >> >> yum install perl >>

Am 21.08.2015 um 21:08 schrieb ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su>: >> On CentOS 7, I'm building a large C++ package with rpmbuild. Arachne >> (https://www.broadinstitute.org/crd/wiki/index.php/Arachne_Main_Page). >> During the debuginfo extraction stage, I get the following error: >> + /usr/lib/rpm/find-debuginfo.sh --strict-build-id -m --run-dwz

RPMS's rebuilt or upstream one's used Hi I got a cleanly reinstalled 4.2 workstation. However i still needed to build the following SRPMS from Mandriva/Fedora :- - Chkrootkit - Logcheck - Tripwire - Xboard & Gnuchess - Rkhunter I needed to use the upstream versions of :- - OpenOffice.org 2.0.1 - RealPlayer Gold - Acrobat Reader I needed to tweak Bind chroot to log queries and

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Hello Centos, Is 4:perl-5.8.8-43.el5_11.x86_64 really dependent on the 32 bit perl.i386 4:5.8.8-43.el5_11 as yum is suggesting, or has something got mixed up on the system? yum install perl Loaded plugins: fastestmirror Loading mirror speeds from cached hostfile * base: repo.bigstepcloud.com * epel: mirror.bytemark.co.uk * extras:

I have been following the MaximumRPM guide from here: http://www.rpm.org/max-rpm-snapshot/index.html and it seems a bit dated, but still very good (if fact the best all round documentation I have found so far) on using RPM package manager, and how to build rpm packages. The guide tells me to use the original paths, yet Centos wiki says otherwise. [rpmbuilder at karsites sox]$ rpm -iv

I am getting unacceptable performace problems by using the roo gem for reading a file by using XLSX or XLS library from this gem. Someone may suggest me an alternative about how to parse an .XLSX file? <code> parsed_file = Excel.new(filename,false, :ignore) if (file_format.upcase == "XLS") parsed_file = Excelx.new(filename,false, :ignore) if (file_format.upcase ==

All, I am now building rpms on, and using a multi-lib arch (x86_64) for the first time ... when using the standard command: rpm -qa | grep pkg_name The results might be pkg_name.i386 or pkg_name.x86_64 ... or both. But, the way it is shown by the default query format, looks the same ... like this: pkg_name pkg_name ---------------------------- example: [root at x86-64 ~]# rpm -qa | grep

During last update packets pidgin and libpurple were updated while "yum update"-ing Is it a common and normal thing that both x86_64 and i386 arch rpms are installed during update? This not the first time. -- Cheers, Alexx mailto:alexx187 at gmail.com

On 21/08/15 22:46, Andrew Neuschwander wrote: > On 08/21/2015 02:04 PM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 21.08.2015 um 21:08 schrieb ????????? ???????? <nevis2us at infoline.su>: >>>> On CentOS 7, I'm building a large C++ package with rpmbuild. Arachne >>>> (https://www.broadinstitute.org/crd/wiki/index.php/Arachne_Main_Page). >>>> During the

Hello, As discussed on the centos-users list, I would like to create some pages on the CentOS Wiki with instructions on how to set up your environment to build RPMs and how to rebuild RPMs. This content today exists here: http://wiki.centos.org/HowTos/I_need_the_Kernel_Source#head-a8dae925eec15786df9f6f8c918eff16bf67be0d I would suggest creating these two: 1)

Hello, I was wondering what is the smallest install that anyone has managed with 4 (4.2 to be precise) ? I'm looking at a machine running as a VPN in a DMZ, so I'm going to remove/NOT INSTALL things like gcc, X, etc. I'm planning on putting this on a 1gb USB stick and booting from it. That reminds me, was there going to be a 1 CD server install image ? The other thing I noticed is

I am attempting to build from a src.rpm (knowing very little about rpm at all) and the spec file notes that the architecture should be set on the command line: > # platform defines - set one below or define the build_xxx on the command line Now. My question is this, how does one do this using rpmbuild? The syntax rpmbuild --target centos4 package.src.rpm seemingly has no effect.