similar to: Learned something today

On Sun, 2016-01-10 at 06:52 -0800, Alice Wonder wrote: > For me, I only need /tmp as tmpfs on my Bitcoin box - and then only when > generating private keys for cold storage, SSDs are often not very good > at securely deleting files. So I use tmpfs for /tmp and generate the > private keys for cold storage to a file in /tmp and then print it from > there (for storage in safe

On 01/11/2016 06:50 AM, Always Learning wrote: > Why not, on start-up, create a 'ram disk' and do your sensitive work in > volatile RAM or is this what 'tmpfs' implies ? I think that's what OP expected tmpfs to be, but it should be noted that tmpfs *can* be swapped to disk, so it should not be used for data that you don't want to ever hit non-volatile storage

For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build as well. With Bitcoin 0.12.0 the ECC stuff that Red Hat ripped out of OpenSSL doesn't matter anymore. -=- That spec file

On 02/24/2016 06:04 AM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Alice Wonder wrote: >> For those interested I have a working spec file for Bitcoin 0.12.0 >> >> https://github.com/AliceWonderMiscreations/bitcoin/blob/master/contrib/rpm/bitcoin.spec >> >> I believe the only BuildRequires that isn't in CentOS/EPEL is >> miniupnpc-devel but that's trivial to build

Sorry this is off-topic, but I'm scrambling to get this system in, google didn't help, and I'm sure someone on this list knows the answer cold. I'm trying to nfs-export a tmpfs disk. I saw a hint from a response about ram disks... which leads to my guess that tmpfs simply doesn't implement some method that nfsd needs. I can probably survive without tmpfs, but I'd like to

With this post, I run the risk of causing more of the thing that I speak against. I still think it's important to say it. CentOS mailing list is a technical forum. It is not a political forum. Just reading a thread on bitcoins and the entire thread quickly turned into a political thread with people bitching about everything from Chase Bank to the Russians, and that's just crap.

Hi all, Excuse the question as I'm sure those more experienced will find it simple. I've a CentOS5.1 box with six physical drives, two of which are used for nightly rsync backups. Contents of /etc/mtab, /etc/fstab, df and a brief narrative follow: ====================================================== # cat ./fstab /dev/VolGroup00/LogVol00 / ext3 defaults

Hello to everybody,   I seem to be in struggle with the websockets in R. I wanted to download the streaming data from the BitCoin exchange MtGox directly to R, but R cannot establish the connection. The websocket specs are defined as: * Host: websocket.mtgox.com or socketio.mtgox.com * Port: 80 or 443 ( ssl ) * Namespace: /mtgox (Including beginning slash) url for more

Hi, I am trying to understand S3 classes. I have read several tutorials about the topics but I am still a bit confused. I guess it is because it is so different from Java OOP. I have pasted my attempt at creating a bank-account class below and my problems are: 1. What should be added some plot.default() calls the account$plot() method ? 2. What should the account$plot() be implemented to

Is there any blog that has information on a potential RHEL 8 release date? boost in 7 is now too old for some things, in addition to gcc. There are solutions in 7 to those issues but it's starting to feel like 6 felt shortly before 7 came out, so I wonder if it is getting near to time. I'm working on a major project bitcoin related and it would be frustrating to deploy a bunch of

On 02/01/2018 6:38 PM, Martin M?ller Skarbiniks Pedersen wrote: > Hi, > > I am trying to understand S3 classes. I have read several tutorials about > the topics but I am still a bit confused. I guess it is because it is > so different from > Java OOP. What you do below isn't S3. S3 is a system where the classes are secondary to the generic functions. Methods

I found an awesome feature today. When you''re setting expectations, you can actually pattern match the parameters to methods. Here''s my discussion and example: http://evang.eli.st/blog/2007/1/19/parameter-matching-in-rspec Pat

Good Day, With warm heart I offer my friendship, and my greetings, and I hope this letter meets you in good time. It will be surprising to you to receive this proposal from me since you do not know me personally. However, I am sincerely seeking your confidence in this transaction, which I propose with my free mind and I hope you will open-heartedly read through and give me your most needed

Hi, I am running the below command on CentOS Linux release 7.6.1810 (Core) # df -hT --total Filesystem Type Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/xvda1 xfs 150G 8.0G 143G 6% / devtmpfs devtmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 0 7.8G 0% /dev/shm tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 817M 7.0G 11% /run tmpfs tmpfs 7.8G 0

I have a server where we use tmpfs as a cache for temporary files used by a web application. But occasionally this tmpfs thinks it is full when it isn't. [root at flask-yellow tmpfs]# touch file touch: cannot touch `file': No space left on device [root at flask-yellow tmpfs]# df -k Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on none 393216 19296

Am 22.10.19 um 04:52 schrieb Orion Poplawski: > On 10/21/19 3:42 PM, Leon Fauster via CentOS wrote: >> Does someone have a working tmp on tmpfs via >> >> systemctl enable tmp.mount >> >> under CentOS8/RHEL8? This seems to work straight in EL7 ... >> >> >> # LANG=C systemctl enable tmp.mount >> The unit files have no installation config

> Are there any advantages/disadvantages to using tmpfs as opposed to the > following method: Matt, Its simple. To quote the docs, "tmpfs lives entirely in the kernel's caches" It will shrink and grow to accommodate the files that currently on the filesystem. So if you allocate 10GB for your /tmp but only use 500MB it will only use 500MB of RAM. Think of the time your server

I've set up a 1GB tmpfs filesystem on a system with a single IDE disk and 2GB's of memory. I'm storing a large amount of RRD files (~300MB) on the tmpfs filesystem to make their generation a bit speedier... this part works great. However, I want to rsync these files over from time to time to a directory on the local filesystem (same physical server). I'm using rsync 2.6.4pre3

I got some weird mail back, claiming that my e-mail was blocked, w/o indicating what server was blocked, after the mail appeared in the mailing list. Is this some BS shakedown? I use postfix on a DSL line forwarding to earthlink, this is hardly something that should be rare in the BSD world... the mail appeared to come from a web mail server and the first link has the following lovely text:

Hi, I seem to have a split brain issue, but I cannot figure out where this is and what it is, can someone help me pls, I cant find what to fix here. ========== root at salt-001:~# salt gluster* cmd.run 'df -h' glusterp2.graywitch.co.nz: Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/mapper/centos-root