similar to: Centos 3.8 Server Questions, SeaMonkey Mozilla and Java

That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. On January 8, 2016 5:18:36 PM EST, Peter <peter at pajamian.dhs.org> wrote: >On 09/01/16 10:08, H wrote: >> In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet >I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I >upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the

On 09/01/16 10:08, H wrote: > In order to run a certain software package that runs as a java applet I had to install Centos 3.8 on a 32-bit server. After installation I upgraded the installation using yum after repointing the configuration file to vault.centos.org. This worked fine, however, I still have to resolve two problems: > - I'd would like to make the EPEL repository available

That is correct, not only do I want to, I need to. Thank you for your explanation of the EPEL policy. On January 8, 2016 5:43:55 PM EST, John R Pierce <pierce at hogranch.com> wrote: >On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: >> That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. > >you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years >ago >which

On 01/09/2016 11:43 AM, John R Pierce wrote: > On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: >> That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. > > you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years > ago which apparently requires software thats known to be insecure and > buggy as all heck. its 2015, not 2005, 10 years is an eternity > in the

But I did not ask for a current version of Centos to support my usecase, did I? On January 9, 2016 1:04:33 PM EST, Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org> wrote: >On Jan 8, 2016, at 10:03 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen at kampensonline.com> >wrote: >> welcome to the real world of 2016, there are lots of bespoke systems >providing real value and definitely not affordable to

On 1/8/2016 2:21 PM, H wrote: > That was not helpful - I explained that I had to run this version. you WANT to run something completely unsupported from about 10 years ago which apparently requires software thats known to be insecure and buggy as all heck. its 2015, not 2005, 10 years is an eternity in the computer industry. whatever this 10 year old application is you're trying

On Jan 8, 2016, at 10:03 PM, Rob Kampen <rkampen at kampensonline.com> wrote: > welcome to the real world of 2016, there are lots of bespoke systems providing real value and definitely not affordable to replace in the cut throat world of a local ISP. This is a sad truth, but it doesn?t mean that CentOS or EPEL should even *try* to support them. If you?re going to run an unsupported,

I have an XPI that I used to apply to mozilla. seamonkey is now loaded instead of mozilla. even if I do a "yum install mozilla" I still get seamonkey. How do I get mozilla. My XPI does not seem to work with seamonkey... THanks, Jerry -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL:

I saw the latest update announcements on the announce list, so I ran "yum check-update" and did not see seamonkey in the list. Which I guess makes sense, since it's a name change from mozilla. However, devhelp is in the list, and "yum update devhelp" pulls in seamonkey as a dependency. This seems like a sort of backdoor way to get seamonkey onto the system. Did these

On Sun, 10 Jan 2016, H wrote: > That is correct, not only do I want to, I need to. It seems like RH 3.8 was around the time of Fedora Core 3-5 so you might be able to install packages from the Fedora archive: http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/archive/fedora/linux/core/ Otherwise you could rebuild source packages from there with: rpmbuild --rebuild ... -- Ian

Does the Seamonkey (Mozilla) web browser exist for CentOS 5.4? It seems to be missing from the standard repository. -- Robert Heller -- 978-544-6933 Deepwoods Software -- Download the Model Railroad System http://www.deepsoft.com/ -- Binaries for Linux and MS-Windows heller at deepsoft.com -- http://www.deepsoft.com/ModelRailroadSystem/

I have searched the bugzilla and seamonkey has bugs when using "-remote openurl(www.google.com)" it always opens a new window. Mozilla did not have this problem. How can I continue to use the old mozilla? Both for system updates and for new 4.4 installs. I need the -remote functionality to not open new windows. Thanks, Jerry

I've been using the SeaMonkey built-in HTML editor from the epel repo for CentOS 6.7: $ repoquery -i seamonkey Name : seamonkey Version : 2.39 Release : 1.el6 Architecture: x86_64 Size : 127340745 Packager : Fedora Project Group : Applications/Internet URL : http://www.seamonkey-project.org Repository : epel Summary : Web browser, e-mail, news,

I'm having persistent trouble deleting larger attachments from messages in Mozilla/Seamonkey mail, and I'm thinking it may be related to Dovecot. A bug report is over at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=381759 I do not have the version number of Dovecot available, unless you know how to get it from the IMAP prompt: > telnet idiom.com 143 Trying 216.240.32.1... Connected

On 01/27/2016 04:59 PM, Clint Dilks wrote: > What is the result of > ldd /usr/lib64/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin # ldd /usr/lib64/seamonkey/seamonkey-bin linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007ffe525fc000) libpthread.so.0 => /lib64/libpthread.so.0 (0x0000003d6b400000) libdl.so.2 => /lib64/libdl.so.2 (0x0000003d6bc00000) librt.so.1 => /lib64/librt.so.1 (0x0000003d6c000000) libstdc++.so.6

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0077 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0077.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: x86_64: devhelp-0.10-0.7.el4.x86_64.rpm devhelp-devel-0.10-0.7.el4.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm seamonkey-chat-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.x86_64.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0077 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0077.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: s390: updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.s390.rpm updates/s390/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.s390.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0077 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0077.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: i386: devhelp-0.10-0.7.el4.i386.rpm devhelp-devel-0.10-0.7.el4.i386.rpm seamonkey-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-chat-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.i386.rpm seamonkey-devel-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.i386.rpm

CentOS Errata and Security Advisory 2007:0077 https://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2007-0077.html The following updated files have been uploaded and are currently syncing to the mirrors: files: updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-chat-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.ia64.rpm updates/ia64/RPMS/seamonkey-devel-1.0.8-0.1.el4.centos.ia64.rpm

Has anyone had any success in rebuilding seamonkey 2.0.4 for CentOS 5 (32-bit)? I'm currently running seamonkey-2.0-1 which I rebuilt last November. Sadly, I have no idea where the SRPM originated. I found seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm and seamonkey-2.0.4-1.fc12.src.rpm, downloaded and got to 0th base: [rj at madeleine Downloads]$ rpmbuild --rebuild