similar to: A query on graphic console

When I re-booted my HP MicroServer into CentOS-7.2 I was given a text console. When I run "startx" I get the response on screen [edited]: ===================== [tim at alfred ~]$ startx xauth: file /home/tim/.serverauth.21307 does not exist X.Org X Server 1.17.2 Release Date: 2015-06-16 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: 2.6.32-220.17.1.el6.x86_64 ... Build ID:

Sylvain CANOINE wrote: > Could you share your whole Xorg.0.log ? Do you use a custom xorg.conf, or > custom xorg.conf.d files ? Opensource Ati driver, ou proprietary blobs ? Thank you for your interest. I am running CentOS-7 installed from CentOS-7-x86_64-LiveKDE-1503.iso and later upgraded to CentOS-7.2. The only packages I have installed have been from CentOS and Epel repos. I'm sure

On CentOS release 6.7, there's file system problem. Aftert reboot /home is set under /home (/home/home) like followings. # ls -l /home total 48 -rw------- 1 root root 7168 Nov 15 19:10 aquota.group -rw------- 1 root root 7168 Jan 25 11:09 aquota.user drwxr-x--- 2 root root 4096 Jan 18 21:55 backups drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Jan 1 11:59 home drwxr-xr-x 8 root root 4096 Apr 5

Hello, Is it possible at all to block all users other than root from sending outbound ICMP packets on an interface? At the moment we have the following two rules in our IPtables config: iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -m owner --uid-owner 0 -j ACCEPT iptables -A OUTPUT -o eth1 -j DROP But this still allows ICMP for some reason (but *does* block other TCP/UDP packets, which is what we want, as well

> No error is given in /var/log/Xorg.0.log. > It seems to find an appropriate ATI Radeon driver, > but it has the warnings > (WW) Falling back to old probe method for modesetting > (WW) Falling back to old probe method for fbdev > (WW) Falling back to old probe method for vesa Could you share your whole Xorg.0.log ? Do you use a custom xorg.conf, or custom xorg.conf.d files ?

----- Mail original ----- > De: "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > ?: "centos" <centos at centos.org> > Envoy?: Mercredi 23 D?cembre 2015 10:11:05 > Objet: Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is up since migrating to 7.2 > I'm a little confused, too. But, it might be more informative to query > the system for

----- Mail original ----- > De: "Ofer Hasson" <hassonofer at gmail.com> > ?: "centos" <centos at centos.org> > Envoy?: Jeudi 24 D?cembre 2015 11:36:00 > Objet: Re: [CentOS] systemd-sysctl not running on boot > [root at web-devel-local-1 ~]# ll -Z /etc/ | grep sysctl > drwxr-xr-x. root root system_u:object_r:etc_t:s0 sysctl.d > >

Am 24.02.2016 um 16:07 schrieb Sylvain CANOINE: > Hello, > > ----- Mail original ----- >> De: "John Cenile" <jcenile1983 at gmail.com> >> ?: "centos" <centos at centos.org> >> Envoy?: Mercredi 24 F?vrier 2016 15:42:36 >> Objet: [CentOS] IPtables block user from outbound ICMP > >> Is it possible at all to block all users

On Jan 24, 2016, at 6:40 PM, Peter Duffy <peter at pwduffy.org.uk> wrote: > The thing which always gets me about systemd is not the thing itself, > but the way it was rolled out. When I first installed Red Hat 7, if a > window had appeared telling me about systemd and asking me if I wanted > to use it, or stick with the old init framework, I'd have opted for the > latter

Hello James, > Well it looks like you are using the network service rather than the > recommended NetworkManager ... Yes. That's the way our security experts made the models I use to setup my servers. I'll test a migration to NetworkManager, and take their advice on it. > > The network service is not blocking the flow so it executes and systemd > carries on ... >

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 06:38:58PM +0000, Always Learning wrote: > When something new is proposed and it is substantially and conspicuously > superior, then everyone wants it. Never noticed that enthusiasm with > systemd's imposition - an imposition nurtured and promoted by the > non-everyday business work environment of experimental Fedora. Maybe you're not aware of it, but

Hi, colleagues! Something strange happens with a server. I am attempting to connect management interface of UPS with server via USB. In console I see a lot of errors: Mar? 7 13:42:04 xxx kernel: ugen2.2: <POWERCOM Co.,LTD HID UPS Battery> at usbus2 Mar? 7 13:42:05 xxx kernel: uhid0 on uhub6 Mar? 7 13:42:05 xxx kernel: uhid0: <POWERCOM Co.,LTD HID UPS Battery, class 0/0, rev 1.10/0.02,

On 12/23/2015 08:38 AM, Sylvain CANOINE wrote: > Then I'm wondering : > 2/ why "After=foo" does not imply "Requires=foo" for systemd 219, while it appeared to be in systemd 208. Either it's a regression, or the behaviour of 208, although logical, is buggy. I'm not entirely certain, but "After=" is independent of "Requires=", as documented

I'm using a bit of a different keyboard, the infinity ergodox [ https://input.club/devices/infinity-ergodox/]. It functions just fine as a keyboard on my host computer, but when I try to bind it to the guest, nothing seems to happen. lsusb gives its ID: Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0003 Linux Foundation 3.0 root hub *Bus 005 Device 003: ID 1c11:b04d* Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux

Hello all, Im having the latest centos that should be integrated into win 2012 active directory domain. Im having Authentication running, an AD user can login via ssh, getent and id working But Im not able to get the samba shares running with AD [sfu-erp] comment = Mandant path = /share # ; valid users = @"RZ-DOMAIN\linuxtest" @"RZ-DOMAIN\linuxtest" valid users =

----- Mail original ----- > De: "Gordon Messmer" <gordon.messmer at gmail.com> > ?: "centos" <centos at centos.org> > Envoy?: Vendredi 18 D?cembre 2015 12:06:26 > Objet: Re: [CentOS] Network services start before network is up since migrating to 7.2 >>> The network service is not blocking the flow so it executes and systemd >>>

Em 21-12-2015 14:24, James Hogarth escreveu: > On 21 December 2015 at 15:08, Sylvain CANOINE <sylvain.canoine at tv5monde.org> > wrote: > >>> If you're using NetworkManager, you can "systemctl enable >>> NetworkManager-wait-online.service" and you won't have to override any >>> of the individual services. >> Our security experts

On Tue, 26 Jan 2016, Peter Duffy wrote: > No one is saying that sysvinit is perfect. What I can't grasp is why > replace it with something which is no less imperfect, and is almost > certainly worse in at least some respects - and to make that replacement > unavoidable and mandatory. Distros weighed up the advantages and disadvantages, and made a decision as to what they thought

Hello Timothy, On 5 January 2016 at 07:55, Timothy Murphy <gayleard at eircom.net> wrote: > When I re-booted my HP MicroServer into CentOS-7.2 > I was given a text console. > When I run "startx" I get the response on screen [edited]: > ===================== > [tim at alfred ~]$ startx > xauth: file /home/tim/.serverauth.21307 does not exist > X.Org X Server

On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 11:51:29AM +0000, Peter Duffy wrote: > I'm also still trying to figure out in what way systemd is supposed to > be "better". I've seen the following things claimed for it: Of the three things you list, hot-plug is certainly an important one. But, it's not the big deal. The big deal is that systemd is not just a fire-and-hope startup system, but