similar to: NFS problem after 7.2

Frank Cox wrote: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:17:28 -0400 > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> <timestamp> <hostname> nfsdcltrack[39406]: sqlite_insert_client: insert >> statement prepare failed: table clients has 2 columns but 3 values were >> supplied >> >> Anyone got any ideas as to a) why this is happening, and b) what I can >> do about it? >

On 12/30/2015 01:10 PM, Mark2015 wrote: > Dec 30 21:59:33 files nfsdcltrack[31076]: sqlite_query_reclaiming: > unable to prepare select statement: no such column: has_session Shot in the dark: have you tried "exportfs -r" yet?

On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 01:34 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 12/30/2015 01:10 PM, Mark2015 wrote: > > Dec 30 21:59:33 files nfsdcltrack[31076]: sqlite_query_reclaiming: > > unable to prepare select statement: no such column: has_session > > Shot in the dark: have you tried "exportfs -r" yet? Tried it, it just returned and nothing in the logs.

Is this normal, or a bug, perhaps a mismatch in two pieces (and this server was just updated late yesterday afternoon, and rebooted this morning): <timestamp> <servername> nfsdcltrack[12128]: sqlite_insert_client: insert statement prepare failed: table clients has 2 columns but 3 values were supplied mark

I'm seeing the following message in my logs: <timestamp> <hostname> nfsdcltrack[39406]: sqlite_insert_client: insert statement prepare failed: table clients has 2 columns but 3 values were supplied Anyone got any ideas as to a) why this is happening, and b) what I can do about it? mark

On Thu, 2 Jun 2016 16:17:28 -0400 m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > <timestamp> <hostname> nfsdcltrack[39406]: sqlite_insert_client: insert > statement prepare failed: table clients has 2 columns but 3 values were > supplied > > Anyone got any ideas as to a) why this is happening, and b) what I can do > about it?

On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:10 PM, Mark2015 <mark2015 at openmailbox.org> wrote: > What to do? Looks like upstream is working on it [1]. According to the BZ, the solution for now is to downgrade nfs-utils [2]. Brandon Vincent [1] https://access.redhat.com/solutions/2065873 [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com//show_bug.cgi?id=1285097

Hai Marco, > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: vrijdag 26 oktober 2018 11:23 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: Re: [Samba] Again NFSv4 and Kerberos at the 'samba way'... > > Mandi! L.P.H. van Belle via samba > In chel di` si favelave... > >

On 11/20/20 2:31 PM, Michael B Allen wrote: > On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 2:06 PM Michael B Allen <ioplex at gmail.com> wrote: >> Apparently I don't know how to do "that" because this: >> >> # iptables -A INPUT -p tcp --sport 760 -m conntrack --ctstate >> NEW,ESTABLISHED -j ACCEPT >> >> still doesn't allow the traffic through (not that I

On Fri, Nov 20, 2020 at 12:18 PM Frank Cox <theatre at sasktel.net> wrote: > > On Fri, 20 Nov 2020 12:07:40 -0500 > Michael B Allen wrote: > > > So TCP src 760 to 41285. What's that? > > Apparently "that" is what you need to allow in order for your desktop to work. > > What it is actually doing, I'm not sure. Google tells me that port 760 has

Good morning Marco and others. > -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- > Van: samba [mailto:samba-bounces at lists.samba.org] Namens > Marco Gaiarin via samba > Verzonden: dinsdag 23 oktober 2018 18:58 > Aan: samba at lists.samba.org > Onderwerp: [Samba] Again NFSv4 and Kerberos at the 'samba way'... > > > Sorry, i come back to this topic in a different thread,

Help solving a performance mystery would be welcome. I have two test programs: * one totally CPU bound (it just infinitely loops) * the other I/O bound (it loops, each time doing * a write, * an fsync or fdatasync (I get similar behavior with either), * an lseek to back up to the same position again Under ext2, if I run these two together, they each run nearly as fast as

Package: logcheck Version: 1.2.22a Severity: wishlist There is no support for imapproxy, and it would be a great help if it was added. Following are two sample lines from the syslog: Jun 11 09:36:55 MyHost in.imapproxyd[30845]: LOGOUT: '"MyUser"' from server sd [13] Jun 11 09:37:02 MyHost in.imapproxyd[30846]: LOGIN: '"MyUser"' (xxx.xxx.xxx.xx:yyyyy) on

>Jerry Geis wrote: >>/ All, />>/ />>/ Over the weekend I purchased a linksys wireless-g PCI card />>/ for use in my amd64 box. I downloaded ndiswrapper, compiled, installed, />>/ tried to load the driver off the CDROM and it was a no-go. />>/ />>/ I have do this on another box with an amd sempron. Difference being />>/ 32 bit versus 64 bit...

Hi list, i noticed that when doing imap gssapi authentication with kerberos, dovecot (here 2.1.7) always searches /etc/krb5.keytab although i have auth_krb5_keytab = /etc/mail3.krb5.keytab in my etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf and doveconf -n also show this setting. If i combine the keytabs in krb5.keytab it works. Is there another location where i should put my configuration regarding gssapi/kerberos ?

On Fri, Sep 14, 2007 at 11:42:18PM -0700, Tanya Lattner wrote: > The 2.1 pre-release (version 1) is available for testing: > http://llvm.org/prereleases/2.1/version1/ > > [...] > > 2) Download llvm-2.1, llvm-test-2.1, and the llvm-gcc4.0 source. > Compile everything. Run "make check" and the full llvm-test suite > (make TEST=nightly report). > > Send

On Thu, 2015-12-31 at 10:16 -0700, Brandon Vincent wrote: > Looks like upstream is working on it [1]. According to the BZ, the > solution for now is to downgrade nfs-utils [2]. Thank you for spotting that one! Don't know it's because I'm still tired from yesterday, but don't seem to be able to downgrade. The command 'yum downgrade nfs-utils' just returns nothing to

I'm experimenting with tor hidden services and got it to work nicely on my Centos7, with tor from epel. That is, until I booted the machine. Then SELinux kicked in and in the logs there's? [warn] Directory /var/lib/tor/hidden_service/ cannot be read: Permission denied The permissions are drwx------.??2 toranon toranon????4096 Jan 28 23:39 hidden_service And SELinux gives the following

On Sun, 2017-01-29 at 15:53 -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote: > On 01/29/2017 11:59 AM, Mark wrote: > > As I don't know what dac_override is I don't know if it's a good > > idea > > to give it to tor and the confidence seems quite low. > > > dac_override indicates that you're running your process as root, and? > it's trying to do something on the