similar to: Re-booting into CentOS-7.2 - advice sought

I have a project using Git on machine A. I'm running a Centos server on machine B. I'd like to "publish" the project on machine B (mainly for my own use, so I can access it from various sites). I've asked about this on a Git mailing list, but haven't understood the replies. In particular, a couple of people suggested gitolite, but when I examined this I couldn't make

My home server is running CentOS-7.1 I'm running postfix and dovecot on it. I collect email from a few sources with fetchmail and move it to ~/Maildir/cur/ with procmail. Or at least, I did do this. For some reason procmail has stopped doing its job, and the email that I collect is finishing in /var/spool/mail/tim/ I can't work out what has caused this, or what the cure is. I haven't

Do most people today have /boot on a separate partition, or do they (you) have it on the / partition ? -- Timothy Murphy gayleard /at/ eircom.net School of Mathematics, Trinity College, Dublin

From: Pavel Butsykin <pbutsykin@virtuozzo.com> This patch improves the search of grub config on EFI partition. This means that the config will be found not only for rhel but also for many other distributions. Tests were performed on the following distributions: centos, fedora, ubuntu, suse. In all cases, the config path was /boot/efi/EFI/*distname*/grub.cfg The main purpose of the patch

Create an object hierarchy to represent different bootloaders for Linux guests, moving the separate handling of grub1 and grub2 in different classes: this isolates the code for each type of bootloader together, instead of scattering it all around. This is mostly code refactoring, with no actual behaviour change. --- po/POTFILES-ml | 1 + v2v/Makefile.am | 2 + v2v/bootloaders.ml

Augeas 1.7.0 was released a couple of days ago. By encouraging everyone to upgrade to this we can drop several calls to aug_transform and also our custom copies of two lenses, and a lot of related code. Rich.

Tru Huynh wrote: > On Fri, Jan 01, 2016 at 11:53:51PM +0100, Timothy Murphy wrote: >> My HP MicroServer crashes with a kernel panic >> when booted into kernel-3.10.0-327.3.1.el7.x86_64, >> but runs perfectly under kernel-3.10.0-229.20.1.el7.x86_64 . > AMD Turion64 cpu? > Could be related to: > https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=9860 > uptream at

Moving to public discussion... This was found with Xen hypervisor version supporting device unplugging and the domU kernel having net-/blkfront and pci platform built-in (or as module). The block device is defined as hda and the NIC type=ioemu (so theoretically guests without pv support would work, too). Since both drivers are present, the kernel tries to unplug the emulated devices and

On Monday, 15 August 2016 16:26:51 CEST Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 04:48:29PM +0200, Pino Toscano wrote: > > Create an object hierarchy to represent different bootloaders for Linux > > guests, moving the separate handling of grub1 and grub2 in different > > classes: this isolates the code for each type of bootloader together, > > instead of

Hi. I''m trying to run Xen 4.0.1 with Debian Squeeze in Dom0 My grub config: menuentry ''Debian GNU/Linux, with Linux 2.6.32-5-xen-amd64 and XEN 4.0-amd64'' --class debian --class gnu-linux --class gnu --class os --class xen { insmod part_msdos insmod ext2 set root=''(hd0,msdos1)'' search --no-floppy --fs-uuid --set e719719a-35aa-4ada-8ab5-9b6c676bc89e

Expose the aug_transform API through the library, so it's possible to add/remove Augeas transformations to handle files in custom places using existing lenses. --- daemon/augeas.c | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++ generator/actions.ml | 12 ++++++++++++ gobject/Makefile.inc | 2 ++ src/MAX_PROC_NR | 2 +- 4 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/daemon/augeas.c

Folks I have a new laptop running Centos 6.2 64-bit. I'd like to put a virtual machine running Windows 7 (licensed), with full audio/video functions, and good response. Which virtual system would you recommend? I can think of KVM, or VirtualBox, or ...? The "good response" requirement pretty much excludes a web-style video presentation. Opinions solicited. David Kurn

Hi all, one of our clients have three branch offices currently connected by ADSL lines. they are using Cisco 827-4V units with the FXS ports connected to their aging PBX units. I am thinking of installing an * server in the head office, maybe with an analogue FXO card connected to the PSTN so field officers in Melbourne can call sydney for a local call price. The question is - what Digium

------------ Original Message ------------ > Date: Saturday, April 30, 2016 11:28:23 -0700 > From: Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> > > I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. > > I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently > working on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it > uses inline JavaScript in a

On Sat, April 30, 2016 1:28 pm, Alice Wonder wrote: > I'm working on setting up an e-mail service. > > I've got the e-mail servers working beautifully and am presently working > on re-writing the parts of Roundcube I don't like (e.g. it uses inline > JavaScript in a few places so CSP breaks it) but - Alice, you may be a lifesaver! Are you considering to also take a

On 04/30/2016 11:28 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > Is there any advice on characters to allow in usernames? ... > I don't think a whitelist alphabet is best approach because of people > with names that are not spelled with Latin characters. > > Is there an existing blacklist of characters that technically legal > but are generally avoided in e-mail addresses? The RFC uses a

On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: > > For e-mail sent to people, yes. > > But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why > blacklisting characters that are not allowed in a username is a standards > problem. That's not how the RFC rules are defined. But, rather than argue that point at

Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: > On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>> >>> For e-mail sent to people, yes. >>> >>> But for what usernames are allowed when creating an account, I don't see why

On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/01/2016 01:57 AM, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 01.05.2016 um 06:43 schrieb Alice Wonder <alice at domblogger.net>: >>> On 04/30/2016 08:56 PM, Gordon Messmer wrote: >>>> On Sat, Apr 30, 2016 at 12:44 PM, Alice Wonder >>>> <alice at domblogger.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>

On 01/05/16 13:23, Alice Wonder wrote: > On 05/01/2016 05:10 AM, Alice Wonder wrote: >> >> I think this is my autism coming in to play, I think what is very clear >> to me I just am not able to adequately communicate because clearly >> people are not even remotely grasping what I am trying to convey. >> > > Basically whether it is a white list or a black list