similar to: Starting stunnel on boot with CentOS7

On my CenOS7 system with stunnel from base stunnel-4.56-4.el7.x86_64 there's a systemd service file /etc/systemd/system/stunnel.service try sudo systemctl enable stunnel.service Hope this helps, K ?al?

Hmmm, you obviously know a lot more about systemd than I do, I'm going to have to look at what you posted more carefully. Thanks. ----- Original Message ----- From: "James Hogarth" <james.hogarth at gmail.com> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 23, 2015 4:08:31 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] Starting stunnel on boot with

On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 12:09:14PM -0600, Leroy Tennison wrote: > The stunnel package doesn't come with an init script and systemctl > doesn't list it as a service I recognize, I guess I could put it in > /etc/rd.d/rc.local or create a script in /etc/rc.d/init.d but > thought I'd ask before creating my own solution. stunnel wraps a plaintext service in an SSL session.

On 23 December 2015 at 05:38, Kahlil Hodgson <kahlil.hodgson at dealmax.com.au> wrote: > On my CenOS7 system with stunnel from base > > stunnel-4.56-4.el7.x86_64 > > there's a systemd service file > > /etc/systemd/system/stunnel.service > > try > > sudo systemctl enable stunnel.service > > > Packaged unit files are in

Hi everybody! I'm trying to set up a secure samba connection across the net using Stunnel. With no joy. Any assistance would be appreciated. (c: I have four PC's. My Windows PC (192.168.0.10), my firewall (192.168.0.1 & 203.36.97.5), the office firewall (202.44.170.5 & 192.168.0.1), and the office file (Samba) server (192.168.0.15). On my office firewall I have the

Hi all Does anyone have a config file for stunnel, to work with /etc/xinetd.d? Stunnel's man page does mention it can work with xinetd, but there's no sample configuration for it. -- Kind Regards Rudi Ahlers

Dear all, I had notice that my logwatch has a heap of stunneling like the one below. Is there a security breech? **Unmatched Entries** (1) LOG5[6504:3086657232]: Connection closed: 29433 bytes sent to SSL, 62 bytes sent to socket (1) LOG5[9516:3086649040]: stunnel 4.15 on i686-redhat-linux-gnu with OpenSSL 0.9.8b 04 May 2006 (1) LOG5[9516:3086649040]: Threading:PTHREAD SSL:ENGINE

Hello I've been using icecast/ices 1.3.11 at home for sometime now, and it works pretty well. Thanks to everyone who has worked on it. Occasionally, icecast will go up to 100% CPU for some reason, but if I restart it this goes away. Ices also has served me well. It dies on occasion too, but I think it's likely due to my custom ices.pm module, since it was much more stable before I

Once upon a time, Leroy Tennison <leroy at datavoiceint.com> said: > The executable could be placed on mounted read-only media That's not as secure as you think. Linux bind mounts can mount a file over another file (plus there's overlay filesystems), so it's possible to replace a binary even on a read-only device. -- Chris Adams <linux at cmadams.net>

Does such exist? I looked for dante and couldn't find that. I found and tried using a version from CentOS 6 but it didn't work. If anyone can point me to an rpm (or set of same) I would most certainly appreciate it. Thanks. Confidentiality Notice | This email and any included attachments may be privileged, confidential and/or otherwise protected from disclosure. Access to this email by

Hi Leroy, How I can confirm that during rsync transfer corruption are not encountered? Thank you in advance. Il 01/07/20 16:04, Leroy Tennison ha scritto: > I've used rsync (but probably not for the size you're referring to), it works and has enough features to meet most needs. I have had a single situation where corruption occurred during transfer (a few times, have no idea why),

Thanks, I got swamped after sending this but will get back to it soon. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Nux!" <nux at li.nux.ro> To: "CentOS mailing list" <centos at centos.org> Sent: Wednesday, December 9, 2015 3:16:21 AM Subject: Re: [CentOS] tsocks or equivalent for CentOS 7

You think this is irritating, what about when you're trying to replicate the network configuration to failover hardware... There is a way around this, I haven't tried it on CentOS but on Ubuntu there are kernel command line parameters: net.ifnames=1 biosdevname=0 which will override this behavior. Again, on Ubuntu these are added in /etc/default/grub as parameters to

Hello everyone. Is there possibility to install CenOS7 on LVM over software RAID? I wasn't able to do it... -- ???????? ??????

I need to connect an older APS UPS unit to a machine running CentOS 7. Unfortunately the UPS only has a serial port whereas the computer does not. I am aware that there are USB-serial adapters but that the hardware or the drivers might fall short of expectations. Does anyone have positive experience with such an adapter? Or, conversely, would recommend avoid a particular adapter?

Il 01/07/20 17:13, Leroy Tennison ha scritto: > I realize this shouldn't happen, the file is a tgz and isn't being modified while being transmitted. This has happened maybe three times this year and unfortunately I've just had to deal with it rather than invest the time to do the research. > > > Harriscomputer > > Leroy Tennison > Network Information/Cyber

Warren Young wrote: > On Oct 25, 2017, at 11:00 AM, Leroy Tennison <leroy at datavoiceint.com> > wrote: >> >> Although "not my question", thanks, I learned a lot about array >> processing from your example. > > Yeah, it?s amazing how many obscure corners of the Bash language must be > tapped to solve such a simple problem. I count 7 features in

Hi everyone, I have updated my backup server to CentOS 8.2. It runs bacula performing backup on disks. I would like to replicate backups on another offsite machine. I read about the ability to configure a new storage daemon in the offsite location and create a Migration/Copy Jobs. If I'm not wrong, it replicates only volumes but not replicate the catalog. I will try this. Another way to

Without context it's impossible to make firm statements but, having gone through this a while back (and discovering that less than 1 percent of an examined list of connections couldn't support current ssl - mainly Apple hardware), who do you want to protect? Is it the minority who won't/can't upgrade or the majority who have? And, do you have to protect yourself from liability

> On Wed, 2020-03-25 at 14:39 +0000, Leroy Tennison wrote: >> Since you state that using -z is almost always a bad idea, could you >> provide the rationale for that? I must be missing something. >> > I think the "rationale" is that at some point the > compression/decompression takes longer than the time reduction from > sending a compressed file. It