similar to: Serial Communication

On Wed, Jul 8, 2020 at 8:46 AM H <agents at meddatainc.com> wrote: > > I believe I mentioned that the UPS has the serial port, the computer thus > has USB. > > yes, but is it 'basic serial UPS' or is it 'enhanced serial UPS' ? the former do NOT use the rx/tx data of the serial port at all, they ONLY use the serial port control signals, and they probably

On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 01:40:27PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, John Pierce <jhn.pierce at gmail.com> said: > > yes, but is it 'basic serial UPS' or is it 'enhanced serial UPS' ? the > > former do NOT use the rx/tx data of the serial port at all, they ONLY use > > the serial port control signals, and they probably will NOT work with a

OK, I am running CentOS 6 on my Laptop and Desktop, presently kernel version 2.6.32-696.20.1.el6.x86_64 (yes, a version or so out of date -- I'll probably do an update soon -- non-trivial since my Internet connection is via dialup). I recently bought a couple of Adafruit Arduino compatibles, a Flora and a Metro 328. Hooking up the Flora and the Metro to a Raspberry Pi running Raspbian

On 6/24/24 12:50, gene heskett via Nut-upsuser wrote: > On 6/24/24 11:30, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: >> Curiously, they identify as |067b:2303 Prolific Technology| like a >> common USB-Serial dongle brand. Experiments with blazer and nutdrv-qx >> got no reasonable response from the devices. >> >> Jim >> > The cure Jim, is eliminate the prolific by

On Mar 20, 2014, at 10:01 AM, Douglas A. Augusto wrote: > Dear NUT users/developers, > > I'm having trouble while trying to configure the UPS APC BZ2200BI-BR[1] in NUT, > which despite having a USB cable it apparently communicates using the serial > protocol. > > The relevant output of 'lsusb' is: > > Bus 002 Device 004: ID 051d:c812 American Power

On 6/24/24 11:30, Jim Klimov via Nut-upsuser wrote: > Got a community question at > https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2466 > <https://github.com/networkupstools/nut/issues/2466> with at least two > users (and UPSes) in trouble. > > Curiously, they identify as |067b:2303 Prolific Technology| like a > common USB-Serial dongle brand. Experiments with blazer

My UPS has a usb interface with USB-to-Serial chip. But ucycom driver doesn't recognize it. uhid driver does, but it doesn't help me, I need a virtual com port. (output below is without uhid loaded) What can I do to get it working? udi = '/org/freedesktop/Hal/devices/usb_device_665_5161_noserial' freebsd.device_file = '/dev/ugen1' (string) freebsd.driver =

I need to connect an older APS UPS unit to a machine running CentOS 7. Unfortunately the UPS only has a serial port whereas the computer does not. I am aware that there are USB-serial adapters but that the hardware or the drivers might fall short of expectations. Does anyone have positive experience with such an adapter? Or, conversely, would recommend avoid a particular adapter?

Hi Chris, I've CC'd Eric Botcazou in the hope that he will clear up just what the Ada front-end needs from the rest of the compiler as far as asynchronous exceptions are concerned. >> gcc Ada turns signals into exceptions. As far as I know it does this >> completely asynchronously, and the fact that LLVM doesn't support this >> is rather bad as far as Ada is

Hi All, I am trying to run a RTOS as a guest on a OMAP5432 evm and am seeing a spurious interrupt problem when programming the virtual timer interrupts. My RTOS test case uses the A15 Virtual timer to create a timer instance. Once programmed, the virtual timer interrupt is injected into my guest's virtual CPU interface as expected and the interrupt is also forwarded to my guest. At this

On Jun 14, 2011, at 10:27 AM, Duncan Sands wrote: > Hi Chris, I've CC'd Eric Botcazou in the hope that he will clear up just what > the Ada front-end needs from the rest of the compiler as far as asynchronous > exceptions are concerned. > >>> gcc Ada turns signals into exceptions. As far as I know it does this >>> completely asynchronously, and the fact

Dear NUT users/developers, I'm having trouble while trying to configure the UPS APC BZ2200BI-BR[1] in NUT, which despite having a USB cable it apparently communicates using the serial protocol. The relevant output of 'lsusb' is: Bus 002 Device 004: ID 051d:c812 American Power Conversion The device is registered as /dev/ttyACM0 and uses the kernel module 'cdc_acm' (USB

I am working on a program which links with the FTDI USB driver (ftd2xx.dylib). Prior to a couple of hours ago I had only worked with Debug builds of my code (no compiler optimizations). In testing a production build, I found that using anything other than -O0 results in the FTDI driver returning bad data; just a lot of zeroes. I tested and re-tested to make sure that changing just that one option

On Feb 26, 2014, at 2:10 AM, Victor Romero wrote: > I got a UPS Sola Basic but it is not working, I'm providing the details. I hope that someone can help me to get it working. > > Please let me know if there is some other information that I should provide :) Thank you for providing all of this information! > OS name and version > Ubuntu 12.04 > $ uname -a > Linux

We've been trying unsuccessfully to connect our Meridian Option 81C to a TE110P via PRI. We've followed the directions in asterisk-meridian-a1.pdf (link on http://www.voip-info.org/wiki/view/Asterisk+legacy+integration), but it doesn't seem to work on our 81C (even though many, many users report it works very well on Option 11's). Has anyone had any success in getting the above

I got a UPS Sola Basic but it is not working, I'm providing the details. I hope that someone can help me to get it working. Please let me know if there is some other information that I should provide :) OS name and version Ubuntu 12.04 $ uname -a Linux olimpo 3.8.0-29-generic #42~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Aug 14 16:19:23 UTC 2013 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux Exact NUT version, 2.7.1

hello everyone, I've been testing the NUT solution as opposed to the undocumented LanSafe application to control my Eaton UPS. I am on a Slackware 13.37 system with a 2.6.37.6 kernel. NUT version is 2.4.3 . I installed the tarball by compiling it directly on my system (as a slackbuild package). The UPS is an Eaton Powerware 9155, but I don't know how to obtain the manufacturing date. The

Hi All, I need one information How much effort is required to port the the rSync utility to any of the RTOS available? (how much is the linux dependent code in the implementattion?) regards Thanks in Advance Biju -- Biju Perumal HCL Technologies Ltd. Voice +91-44-3728366 (Xtn-1134) http://san.hcltech.com

Hello! At first, i want to run the latest HandBrake (version 0.93) on a Mac with Mac OS 10.4 (Tiger). The problem is, that Handbrake is developed for Mac OS 10.5 (XCode SDK is not compatible to Mac OS 10.4 one). So i decided to try it with wine/darwine. Because wine is better supported on Linux and you can get easier newer version (apt-get), i decided to run HandBrakeCLI.exe on Debian Etch

Hi Tim. Thank you for taking to time to comment on the background! I will definitely study lldb and remote JIT for ideas.  I worry that I will not be able to pre-link on the host side because the host cannot(?) know the final memory layout of code on the client side, especially when there are multiple plugins being loaded in different combinations on the host and client.  Is that an