Displaying 20 results from an estimated 10000 matches similar to: "google chrome future / centos 7"
2015 Dec 17
2
google chrome future / centos 7
Current midori builds in mock, I just tried, but the BuildRequires
appear to be wrong because not all the extensions are built resulting in
not all extensions found in %files section being there.
I'll look at the build log and maybe see if there is a way to make it
work and file bug report with fix + EPEL build request if I can get it
to work.
I know it's not chrome, but it is webkit
2015 Dec 17
2
google chrome future / centos 7
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +0000, Richard wrote:
> >
> > I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome
> > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines:
> >
> > This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates
> > because this Linux
2015 Dec 17
4
google chrome future / centos 7
> Date: Thursday, December 17, 2015 16:28:01 -0500
> From: Jonathan Billings <billings at negate.org>
>
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +0000, Richard wrote:
>>
>> I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome
>> 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines:
>>
>> This computer will soon stop receiving Google
2015 Dec 17
0
google chrome future / centos 7
Nevermind, it wasn't an extensions issue.
The issue looks to be related to the spec file thinking I was running
Fedora < 19
Given fedora < 19 is EOL removing those conditionals may fix it.
Oh and sorry for the top posting, is there a way in Thunderbird for
CentOS to change that default?
On 12/17/2015 12:58 PM, Alice Wonder wrote:
> Current midori builds in mock, I just tried,
2015 Dec 17
0
google chrome future / centos 7
Ouch I don't know. Awhile back I was successfully running midori on
CentOS but I stopped because it was a PITA to keep porting Fedora spec
files to CentOS to get it to work, as Fedora diverged more and more.
Maybe there should be a SIG or whatever to maintain webkit browsers for
CentOS for those who don't like FireFox.
On 12/17/2015 12:37 PM, Richard wrote:
> I'm seeing the
2015 Dec 17
0
google chrome future / centos 7
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +0000, Richard wrote:
>
> I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome
> 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines:
>
> This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates
> because this Linux system will no longer be supported.
>
> Does this portend a support issue for chrome on centos-7
2015 Dec 17
0
google chrome future / centos 7
On Thu, December 17, 2015 4:18 pm, Fred Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 04:28:01PM -0500, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 08:37:32PM +0000, Richard wrote:
>> >
>> > I'm seeing the following banner when I start up google-chrome
>> > 48-beta (48.0.2564.48 beta (64-bit)) on my 7.2 machines:
>> >
>> > This computer
2015 Dec 18
3
google chrome future / centos 7
On Fri, December 18, 2015 7:34 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +0000, Richard wrote:
>> On the linked-to help page:
>>
>> <https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/95346>
>>
>> they show fedora-21[+] as supported. If I remember correctly,
>> RHEL/CentOS-7 is based against fedora-19.
>
> Actually, in two places on
2014 Jun 11
2
Google chrome vs network settings proxy?
I started using chrome on the RHEL7 beta after some firefox hangs -
but maybe this behavior is generic. I have the system 'network
settings/network proxy' set to use squid on another host for
connections out of the private range we use. This proxy requires
authentication so I can always tell the first time a browser uses it.
However, I can start a chrome connection to gmail and it
2015 Dec 18
4
google chrome future / centos 7
On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>> <sarcasm>
>> I guess we all are divided into two categories
>>
>> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my
>> choice, the hell with that crap (and google itself).
>>
>> 2. If google
2016 Jan 25
7
Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
Hi all,
Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my CentOS 6.7
x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore by Google Chrome.
"This computer will soon stop receiving Google Chrome updates because this
Linux system will no longer be supported."
Doing some google searches I found this;
2008 Dec 24
5
Odd js behavior in Chrome & Safari
View file has a js function "confirm_result()" in <head> section:
<script type="text/javascript">
function confirm_action()
{
result = confirm("Please select OK or Cancel")
if (result == true)
document.write("You selected OK.")
else
document.write("You selected Cancel.")
}
</script>
2015 Dec 18
0
google chrome future / centos 7
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 09:38:40PM +0000, Richard wrote:
> On the linked-to help page:
>
> <https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/95346>
>
> they show fedora-21[+] as supported. If I remember correctly,
> RHEL/CentOS-7 is based against fedora-19.
Actually, in two places on that page they say:
"Ubuntu 12.04+, Debian 7+, OpenSuSE 13.1+, or Fedora Linux 21"
2015 Dec 18
0
google chrome future / centos 7
On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
> <sarcasm>
> I guess we all are divided into two categories
>
> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my
> choice, the hell with that crap (and google itself).
>
> 2. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my
> choice, I'll use whatever
2008 Sep 10
9
[Bug 17521] New: swfdec_stream_errorv: error in stream for unknown url: Network error
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17521
Summary: swfdec_stream_errorv: error in stream for unknown url:
Network error
Product: swfdec
Version: git
Platform: x86 (IA32)
OS/Version: Linux (All)
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: plugin
AssignedTo:
2016 Jun 02
4
FYI: http
I just had to browse to a printer... and with https-use-strict at a server
higher up, firefox *would* *not* let me get there. I don't see the
circa-2012 printer offering https.
Luckily, there was konqueror, which *did* let me go to http://<printer>
I just *adore* SmartSoftware that Won't Let You Endanger Yourself....
Reminds me of Jack Williamson's old novel, The Humanoids.
2019 Jun 26
1
Alternitives to Firefox...
At Thu, 27 Jun 2019 04:12:07 +0800 CentOS mailing list <centos at centos.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Wed, 2019-06-26 at 15:58 -0400, Robert Heller wrote:
> > OK, I recently ugraded to the current ESR release of Firefox for CentOS 6.
> > And I am having problems with the user interface (basically it has become
> > hard
> > [for me] to use).
2015 Dec 18
0
google chrome future / centos 7
Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>
> On Fri, December 18, 2015 10:27 am, Jonathan Billings wrote:
>> On Fri, Dec 18, 2015 at 09:55:39AM -0600, Valeri Galtsev wrote:
>>> <sarcasm>
>>> I guess we all are divided into two categories
>>>
>>> 1. If google [something] doesn't work on the operating system of my
>>> choice, the hell with that crap
2016 Jan 25
1
Google Chrome and CentOS 6?
Am 25.01.2016 um 16:19 schrieb Richard <lists-centos at listmail.innovate.net>:
>
>
>> Date: Monday, January 25, 2016 07:18:06 +0000
>> From: Sorin Srbu <Sorin.Srbu at orgfarm.uu.se>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Just recently I started getting the dreaded message about my
>> CentOS 6.7 x64-installation wasn't going to be supported anymore
2011 Apr 04
3
Is Centos 5.5 too old fro Google Chrome?
I tried to install Google Chrome and received the dependencies
error. Is Centos too old for the new Chrome or is there an older
Chrome version that is compatible?
Todd
--
Ariste Software
Petaluma, CA 94952
http://www.aristesoftware.com