similar to: CentOS 6, bareos, kerberos?

Displaying 20 results from an estimated 4000 matches similar to: "CentOS 6, bareos, kerberos?"

2015 Dec 09
0
CentOS 6, bareos, kerberos?
On Wed, Dec 09, 2015 at 09:22:29AM -0500, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > After upgradeding to bareos 15.2, which also has a web ui, thereby making > it usable (since the command line tool, bconsole, does not have a paging > mechanism, and its sytax for choosing files to restore is, let us say, > arcane), I've got another question: is *anyone* using bareos with > kerberos? I see
2015 Sep 03
2
semi-OT: help needed w/ bareos
IP wrote: > W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: >> On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >>> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >>>> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. >>>> Trouble is, >>>> all I
2015 Sep 03
3
semi-OT: help needed w/ bareos
On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: > Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, >> all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to >> install on Windoze",
2015 Sep 02
2
semi-OT: help needed w/ bareos
I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to install on Windoze", and how to restore.... First question: how do you *see* a list of the files that have been backed up (you're not going to tell
2015 Nov 24
4
OT: bareos, Windoze, beating head on wall
Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't get much response. I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my path first - I don't just see it with ls. Then, when I do an ls, in
2015 Nov 24
1
OT: bareos, Windoze, beating head on wall
Valeri Galtsev wrote: > > On Tue, November 24, 2015 12:38 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: <snip> >> I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The >> restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few >> files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my path first - I >> don't just see it with ls. Then,
2015 Nov 19
2
OT: bareos
Hi, folks, I've got it set up, and it alleges that it's backing up Windows. However, when I try to run a restore for a Windows box, in bconsole, I say restore, then from most recent, then the client, and I want to select files. It builds its directory tree (it says), then tells me it's at c:/ (*Nix, not Win backslash)... and there's nothing there. The fileset stanza says to
2015 Sep 03
0
semi-OT: help needed w/ bareos
W dniu 2015-09-03 o 13:56, mark pisze: > On 09/02/15 21:27, Leon Fauster wrote: >> Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: >>> I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for >>> Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. >>> Trouble is, >>> all I keep finding on the Web are "how to
2015 Nov 24
0
OT: bareos, Windoze, beating head on wall
On Tue, November 24, 2015 12:38 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I didn't > get much response. > > I'm trying to do a restore, from my CentOS 6 box, to a WinDoze box. The > restore command is *not* user-friendly if you just want to restore a few > files. And it gets weird.... First, I have to mark my
2015 Nov 25
2
OT: bareos, Windoze, beating head on wall
Ireneusz Piasecki wrote: > W dniu 24.11.2015 o 19:38, m.roth at 5-cent.us pisze: >> Again, I'm posting here because when I tried their mailing list, I >> didn't get much response. > > It's normal for bareos mailing list and bugtrac system. Bareos is paid > support oriented (even opesourced), so don't expect so much help from > them - when they could get
2015 Sep 03
0
semi-OT: help needed w/ bareos
Am 02.09.2015 um 22:18 schrieb m.roth at 5-cent.us: > I've got it installed on a 6.7 server, and can back up and restore for > Linux. Now I'm trying to do it for some users' WinDoze boxes. Trouble is, > all I keep finding on the Web are "how to set it up on Linux", "how to > install on Windoze", and how to restore.... > > First question: how do
2016 May 17
2
bareos on CentOS 6
Hi, folks, I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person view my post.... It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for months. Then, about a week ago, the server got a regular yum update, and rebooted... and it's broken. A job will start... and just keep running forever (as in,
2016 May 17
1
bareos on CentOS 6
Paul Heinlein wrote: > On Tue, 17 May 2016, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > >> I'm hoping *someone* here has worked a bit with bareos. I've tried >> posting to the google groups for it... and haven't even had one person >> view my post.... >> >> It was working fine, backing up windows boxes for months. Then, about >> a week ago, the server got
2015 Jul 19
1
was, Backups solution from WinDoze to linux, is, looking at bareos [SOLVED]
On 07/16/2015 04:25 PM, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: >> I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been >> looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd >> like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found >> yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back
2015 Jul 16
1
was, Backups solution from WinDoze to linux, is, looking at bareos [SOLVED]
m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been > looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd > like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found > yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online > storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm
2015 Jul 16
3
was, Backups solution from WinDoze to linux, is, looking at bareos
I see that bareos is, actually, the descendent of bacula. I've been looking at some of the documentation, and searching, but one thing I'd like to find out, before I try to implement it, and that I haven't found yet: am I going to have to play games, to get it to back up to online storage, as opposed to tape? (I suppose I'm thinking tar, here, as "no games".) Is there
2015 Aug 12
1
OT: bareos (F/OSS fork of bacula)
I'm trying to get this up and running, and have run into something that isn't clear in the docs: volumes are part of pools, I get, but I see that the limit to the number of volumes is 100. Is this a drop-dead can't-go-beyond? If I have > 100 clients to back up, do they all go to one volume, or to individual volumes? mark
2015 Nov 19
0
OT: bareos
On Thu, November 19, 2015 12:13 pm, m.roth at 5-cent.us wrote: > Hi, folks, > > I've got it set up, and it alleges that it's backing up Windows. > However, when I try to run a restore for a Windows box, in bconsole, I > say restore, then from most recent, then the client, and I want to > select files. It builds its directory tree (it says), then tells me > it's
2019 Jan 27
3
Centos 7 and backup solution
Il 27/01/19 13:32, Peter Eckel ha scritto: > Hi Alessandro, > >> what type of backup solution do you use on C7? > > the same as on most other operating systems: Bareos. > > <http://www.bareos.org/en/> > > Bareos has some learning curve, but it's free, it's extremely reliable and flexible. I've been using it for years, after switching from its
2015 Jul 16
4
Backups solution from WinDoze to linux
On Wed, July 15, 2015 7:05 pm, Michael Mol wrote: > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015, 10:37 AM <m.roth at 5-cent.us> wrote: > > My manager just tasked me at looking at this, for one team we're > supporting. Now, he'd been thinking of bacula, but I see their Windows > binaries are now not-free, so I'm looking around. IIRC, Les thinks highly > of backuppc; comments on that,